Comparison of Computer-Assisted and Conventional Local Anesthesia in Children With Molar-Incisor Hypomineralization

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age8-12
SponsorMarmara University

About this trial

The main questions this study aims to answer are:

Does computer-controlled local anesthesia cause less pain and anxiety than conventional local anesthesia in children with molar-incisor hypomineralization (MIH)?

Is there a difference between the two methods in anesthesia onset time, injection duration, physiological responses, and the need for additional anesthesia?

Researchers will compare computer-controlled and conventional local anesthesia in children aged 8-12 years with MIH. Each child will receive both anesthesia methods during separate dental visits, on comparable permanent molar teeth, to determine which method is more comfortable, effective, and preferred by children.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Children aged 8-12 years

Children with no systemic disease

Children with no pathology involving the oral region, such as trauma, cysts, or tumors

Children who have not used antibiotics within the past month

Disqualifiers

Children in whom local anesthesia cannot be administered due to lack of cooperation

Children who require pulp treatment after enrollment in the study will be withdrawn from the study.

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Computer-Controlled Local Anesthesia
  • Conventional Local Anesthesia

Treatment groups

54 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators