Comparison of Different PEEP Strategies in Moderate-to-Severe ARDS Based on Various Bedside Assessment Tools

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice

About this trial

Many patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for a severe lung disease called acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) require mechanical ventilation and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to improve their oxygenation. Ventilator settings-and particularly the level of PEEP-are critical in the management of these patients. In fact, inappropriate ventilator settings can lead to a worsening of the patients' lung disease or compromise their hemodynamic status.

PEEP is a pressure maintained by the ventilator during the patient's exhalation to keep the alveoli open throughout the respiratory cycle. When PEEP is increased, if many alveoli open, this is called alveolar recruitment, which is the expected beneficial effect. However, in some patients, increasing PEEP can cause already-open alveoli to become overdistended without opening new alveoli; this is known as pulmonary overdistension. This phenomenon of overdistension will worsen the patient's pulmonary condition and may also lead to hemodynamic deterioration. To date, numerous techniques have been proposed for determining the optimal PEP level (alveolar recruitment without pulmonary overdistension) in these patients, but none can be recommended as the gold standard. The objective of our study is therefore to compare the various existing methods for determining the optimal PEEP level, in order to determine whether these methods are interchangeable and which would be the best method to use to optimize the care of these patients.

To this end, the investigators plan to conduct a prospective, observational, multicenter study in the Intensive Care Units of the Nice University Hospital and the European Hospital of Marseille. Patients on mechanical ventilation for ARDS will be included in the study, and medical and laboratory data from the electronic medical records obtained during the various PEEP measurements to determine the optimal PEEP will be analyzed.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients on invasive mechanical ventilation

Bilateral findings on chest X-ray

PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio <200 with PEEP ≥+5 cmH₂O

No evidence of cardiogenic pulmonary overload

Disqualifiers

Individuals receiving enhanced protection, namely minors

Individuals deprived of their liberty by a judicial or administrative decision

Pregnant and breastfeeding women

Individuals residing in a health or social care facility

Trial design

Design model

Single group

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Ventilation at different levels of PEP including a test involving a gradual decrease in PEP.

    Dietary supplement

    Initial PEEP level will be set according to the PEEP/FiO2 table. The PEEP level will then be adjusted to achieve a plateau pressure of 28-30 cmH₂O. After 10 minutes, various hemodynamic and respiratory variables will be recorded, and an arterial blood gas analysis will be performed to assess the patient's respiratory mechanics and oxygenation. Next, the airway opening pressure will be measured, and the patient's recruitment potential will be assessed by calculating the R/I ratio through a sudden reduction in PEP from 15 cmH₂O to 5 cmH₂O over a single respiratory cycle. Following this, PEEP will be raised back to the initial level for at least 5 minutes and then gradually reduced in 2 cmH₂O increments every 2 minutes until reaching the AOP level or a PEEP level of 5 cmH₂O. In total, the optimal PEP level will be determined using six different techniques, allowing the clinician to obtain six optimal PEP values and thus best customize the ventilator settings for each patient.

Treatment groups

45 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: Study populationExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Level of positive end expiratory pressure

The primary outcome measure will be the optimal level of positive end expiratory pressure achieved with each of the methods used. The measurement of differents optimal level of positive end expiratory pressure will be determined after the positive end expiratory pressure reduction procedure.

Time frame
at baseline

Secondary outcomes

1

Minimale driving pressure

Minimale driving pressure will be assessed at various optimal positive end expiratory pressure levels according with each of the methods used. Determining the minimum driving pressure of differents optimal level of positive end expiratory pressure will be determined after the positive end expiratory pressure reduction procedure

Time frame
at baseline
2

Maximum pulmonary compliance

Maximum pulmonary compliance will be assessed at various optimal positive end expiratory pressure levels according with each of the methods used. Determining the maximum pulmonary compliance of differents optimal level of positive end expiratory pressure will be determined after the positive end expiratory pressure reduction procedure

Time frame
at baseline

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: