Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

This prospective cohort study aims to evaluate whether blood levels of soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products (sRAGE), Club Cell Protein-16 (CC16), and Syndecan-1 measured early after severe chest trauma can predict the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and in-hospital mortality. Adult patients aged 18 years or older admitted with severe blunt or penetrating chest trauma will be enrolled. Clinical data, injury severity, laboratory findings, imaging results, and clinical outcomes will be recorded. Patients will be followed daily during the first 7 days after admission for the development of ARDS, and in-hospital mortality will be recorded until discharge or death. The findings may help identify patients at high risk of respiratory complications and poor outcomes after severe chest trauma.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is when a person's lungs become inflamed, which can be caused by infection, trauma, surgery, blood transfusion, or burn. ARDS often leads to a situation where the person cannot breathe independently and needs machines' help. Once the lungs are inflamed, the small air sacs responsible for exchanging gases (i.e., ventilation) and the blood flow in the lungs (i.e., perfusion) can be affected. In the past, most research focused on studying ventilation physiology and how to help people breathe with machines. Less was done on perfusion because it requires imaging techniques such as computed tomography with intravenous contrast and radiation. One treatment option for low oxygen levels is inhaled nitric oxide (iNO), a gas that can dilate the lung blood vessels and improve oxygenation; however, it is not always clear whether this treatment will work. Prone position has been used for several years in the care of ARDS patients and has been demonstrated to improve survival in more severe patients. It is not known how iNO and prone positioning interact in determining the distribution of pulmonary perfusion and whether their combine use can benefit ARDS patients. Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) is a bedside and accessible imaging technique that is radiation-free and non-invasive and can potentially detect changes in lung perfusion. EIT can perform multiple measurements; it is portable and accessible. This prospective interventional study aims to assess changes in regional blood perfusion in the lungs of patients with ARDS in response to iNO and to prone positioning utilizing EIT. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. If EIT can measure lung regional perfusion response to an iNO challenge of 20ppm for 15 minutes. 2. If EIT can measure the lung regional perfusion responses to prone position, applied alone and in combination with iNO. 3. If EIT is comparable to dual-energy computed tomography (DECT), the gold-standard method, in the detection of changes in regional lung perfusion due to iNO. 4. If EIT can be an imaging marker to identify ARDS severity Participants will be divided into three cohorts: 1. Sub-Cohort 1 (n=60): Participants will be asked to be monitored by EIT before, during, and after the administration of iNO (20 ppm) for 15 minutes (OFF-ON-OFF) in the supine position 2. Sub-Cohort 2 (N=10): Participants will be asked to be monitored by EIT before and during the administration of iNO (20 ppm) for 15 minutes (OFF-ON) in both the supine and in the prone position. The same subjects will be monitored also with DECT in the supine position and then after 30 minutes in the prone position (without NO administration). 3. Sub-Cohort 3 (N=10): In this subset of Sub-Cohort 1, subjects will be asked to be monitored also with DECT (in addition to EIT) in the supine body position before iNO and after 15 minutes while receiving iNO.

This is a Phase 2 multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study that will evaluate the safety and efficacy of host-directed therapeutics in hospitalized adults diagnosed with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) utilizing a platform trial design. Participants will be randomized to receive either a placebo or one of the active treatments. This record describes the default procedures and analyses for all cohorts. Each specific cohort may have additional eligibility requirements, safety and efficacy procedures, or endpoints, which will be described in the corresponding intervention-specific records on clinicaltrials.gov listed below in the detailed description.

This is a Phase 2 multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study that will evaluate the safety and efficacy of host-directed therapeutics in hospitalized adults diagnosed with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) utilizing a platform trial design. Cohort A: Participants will be randomized to receive either a placebo or vilobelimab. This record describes the default procedures and analyses for Cohort A. Please see NCT06703073 for information on the BP-ARDS-P2-001 Master Protocol.

This is a Phase 2 multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study that will evaluate the safety and efficacy of host-directed therapeutics in hospitalized adults diagnosed with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) utilizing a platform trial design. Cohort B: Participants will be randomized to receive either a placebo or paridiprubart. This record describes the default procedures and analyses for Cohort B. Please see NCT06703073 for information on the BP-ARDS-P2-001 Master Protocol.

This is a Phase 2 multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study that will evaluate the safety and efficacy of host-directed therapeutics in hospitalized adults diagnosed with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) utilizing a platform trial design. Cohort C: Participants will be randomized to receive either a placebo or bevacizumab. This record describes the default procedures and analyses for Cohort C. Please see NCT06703073 for information on the BP-ARDS-P2-001 Master Protocol.

Many patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for a severe lung disease called acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) require mechanical ventilation and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to improve their oxygenation. Ventilator settings-and particularly the level of PEEP-are critical in the management of these patients. In fact, inappropriate ventilator settings can lead to a worsening of the patients' lung disease or compromise their hemodynamic status. PEEP is a pressure maintained by the ventilator during the patient's exhalation to keep the alveoli open throughout the respiratory cycle. When PEEP is increased, if many alveoli open, this is called alveolar recruitment, which is the expected beneficial effect. However, in some patients, increasing PEEP can cause already-open alveoli to become overdistended without opening new alveoli; this is known as pulmonary overdistension. This phenomenon of overdistension will worsen the patient's pulmonary condition and may also lead to hemodynamic deterioration. To date, numerous techniques have been proposed for determining the optimal PEP level (alveolar recruitment without pulmonary overdistension) in these patients, but none can be recommended as the gold standard. The objective of our study is therefore to compare the various existing methods for determining the optimal PEEP level, in order to determine whether these methods are interchangeable and which would be the best method to use to optimize the care of these patients. To this end, the investigators plan to conduct a prospective, observational, multicenter study in the Intensive Care Units of the Nice University Hospital and the European Hospital of Marseille. Patients on mechanical ventilation for ARDS will be included in the study, and medical and laboratory data from the electronic medical records obtained during the various PEEP measurements to determine the optimal PEEP will be analyzed.

Hospitalized patients with ARDS will be randomized to intravenous treatment with a monoclonal antibody against CD14, called IC14, or placebo. They will be followed for 28 days. The primary outcome is the day 4 oxygenation index assessed as a continuous measure.

This prospective, randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate whether an AI-driven decision support system can improve clinical outcomes for mechanically ventilated pediatric patients (aged 1 month to 18 years) in the PICU, compared to standard care. The primary question addressed is: Do patients whose ventilator parameter optimization decisions are guided by AI assistance achieve a greater number of ventilator-free days within 28 days compared to those managed with standard care by medical staff? Eligible pediatric patients requiring mechanical ventilation following tracheal intubation will be randomly assigned (1:1) to either the AI-guided intervention group or the standard care control group. In the intervention group, physicians will receive real-time, AI-generated recommendations for ventilator parameters to inform clinical adjustments. In contrast, the control group will be managed according to standard clinical protocols. This study seeks to assess whether AI-driven ventilator optimization can effectively improve clinical outcomes and shorten ventilation duration for pediatric patients in the PICU.

China faces major challenges in the ECMO management of patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS, including substantial heterogeneity in clinical practice, low weaning success rates, and high complication rates. A key underlying reason is the lack of a standardized full-course management pathway that is applicable to real-world clinical practice in China. This study focuses on the construction and evidence-based evaluation of a precision full-course ECMO management pathway for patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS, aiming to address fragmented care processes and delayed quality improvement. The study includes three main components. First, multidisciplinary consensus and evidence-based findings will be integrated to develop a standardized management pathway covering the full chain of assessment, initiation, maintenance, weaning, and rehabilitation. Second, a nationwide multicenter real-world study with a before-and-after design will be conducted to systematically evaluate the clinical effectiveness of this pathway in reducing mortality and complications and improving patient outcomes. Third, a closed-loop dynamic optimization system based on "pathway-data-feedback-improvement" will be established. With the support of an intelligent data platform and multidisciplinary review mechanisms, the pathway will be continuously updated and refined. Through this study, a reproducible, traceable, and evaluable full-course ECMO management strategy is expected to be established. The study will also build a national collaborative research network and support the development of living clinical guidance, promoting the transition of ECMO care in China from experience-based practice toward standardized, homogeneous, and intelligent management, and providing a key technical framework and practical model for improving critical care.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a common and life-threatening condition in intensive care units, characterized by substantial biological and clinical heterogeneity. Differences in patients' inflammatory responses, baseline immune function, and organ failure patterns contribute to variability in ARDS severity, treatment response, and clinical outcomes. Precision classification of ARDS based on biological and inflammatory characteristics may therefore be essential for improving patient outcomes. Previous analyses of randomized clinical trials have identified two reproducible inflammatory subphenotypes-"hyperinflammatory" and "hypoinflammatory"-which differ in organ dysfunction profiles, clinical trajectories, and responses to treatments such as fluid management strategies, corticosteroids, and ventilatory interventions. However, key uncertainties remain, including whether these inflammatory subphenotypes can be validated in Chinese ARDS populations, how various bedside prediction models perform in identifying these subphenotypes, and whether model-based subphenotype identification can guide individualized treatment decisions. This multicenter cohort study aims to: (1) validate inflammatory subphenotypes of ARDS using latent class analysis; (2) compare the predictive performance of existing bedside models for subphenotype identification; and (3) assess whether subphenotype assignment based on prediction models can guide individualized treatment strategies, including fluid management, PEEP titration, and corticosteroid use. In addition to these primary aims, the study may include other exploratory objectives, such as evaluating subphenotype stability over time, characterizing biological pathways associated with subphenotypes, and assessing additional treatment-response patterns to support future precision ARDS management strategies.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome is characterized by heterogeneous lung injury, with dependent regions often collapsed and non-dependent regions relatively well-aerated, forming the so called "baby lung." Mechanical ventilation, while essential, can induce additional lung injury (VILI) via overdistension (baro/volutrauma) or repetitive alveolar collapse (atelectrauma). Protective ventilation strategies with low tidal volumes (VT 6-8 mL/kg predicted body weight, PBW) reduce mortality, but their efficacy relies on accurate PBW estimation, which is derived from patient height. In critical care, height measurement is often challenging, and common methods such as visual estimation or tape measurement can be inaccurate, leading to inappropriate VT settings and increased risk of lung stress and VILI. Alternative methods, including heel-to-knee distance and laser measurement, may offer more precise PBW estimation, yet their impact on lung mechanics in ARDS remains unexplored. This study addresses the knowledge gap by evaluating whether differences in height measurement methods significantly affect lung stress, tidal volume distribution, and ventilatory mechanics in ARDS patients. Patients' heights will be measured using five methods (stadiometer, visual, tape, laser, heel-to knee). Corresponding PBW and tidal volumes (VT = 6 mL/kg PBW) will be calculated and applied in randomized order, each for 30 minutes. Lung stress, ventilatory mechanics, gas exchange, and regional ventilation distribution will be assessed for each VT setting, preceded by a short alveolar recruitment maneuver. During the study, continuous monitoring of hemodynamics and oxygenation will be performed. Ventilatory parameters including plateau pressure, driving pressure, and transpulmonary pressures will be recorded. Electrical impedance tomography will assess regional tidal volume distribution. Each patient's participation is limited to approximately two hours with no further follow-up.

The goal of this interventional study is to compare standard mechanical ventilation to a lung-stress oriented ventilation strategy in patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). Participants will be ventilated according to one of two different strategies. The main question the study hopes to answer is whether the personalized ventilation strategy helps improve survival.

BTI-203 is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, Phase 2 proof-of-concept (POC) study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rhu-pGSN plus standard of care (SOC) in subjects with moderate-to-severe ARDS (P/F ratio ≤150) due to pneumonia or other infections. Potential subjects hospitalized with pneumonia or other infections are to be screened within 24 hours of diagnosis of ARDS.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if R-3750 is safe in \[in patients with late-stage, non-resolving Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) . The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are: 1. the favorable safety profile 2. clinical improvement that includes reduced ventilator dependence and improved lung function. Participants will be given oral capsules daily and/or enteral nasogastric or orogastric (NG/OG tube) if necessary.

This study will investigate how different types of routine sedation may affect patient's breathing whilst on a ventilator in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). There are different approaches to sedation which may have advantages and disadvantages. During the study patients will receive both intravenous and inhaled volatile sedation (similar to anaesthetic 'gases' used for general anaesthesia) and the drive to breath, breathing efforts and function of the lung will be assessed.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether methylprednisolone improves outcomes in critically ill patients with a hyperinflammatory phenotype. It will also evaluate the safety of methylprednisolone at different doses. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does methylprednisolone improve organ function compared with placebo? * Does methylprednisolone reduce the risk of mortality within 30 days? Researchers will compare high-dose methylprednisolone (160mg/d), low-dose methylprednisolone (80mg/d), and placebo (normal saline) to evaluate effectiveness and safety. Participants will: * Receive high-dose methylprednisolone, low-dose methylprednisolone, or placebo every 12 hours for the first 3 days * Be reassessed on Day 4 based on their inflammatory status If the hyperinflammatory phenotype persists, the treatment dose will be reduced by half and continued until Day 7 or ICU discharge, whichever occurs first If the patient transitions to a hypoinflammatory phenotype, the study treatment will be discontinued * Be monitored daily in the intensive care unit for organ function, inflammatory status, and need for organ support * Be followed for up to 30 days after randomization to assess survival and recovery

Prone position (placing the patient on his abdomen) has been shown to be an effective intervention to decrease mortality in adults connected to mechanical ventilation for moderate to severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). Patients may require one or more sessions of prone position. However, the optimal duration of prone sessions is unknown. The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if applying prone position in prolonged sessions (\> 48 hours - prolonged prone position) is more effective than applying it in daily sessions (16 to 24 hours - intermittent prone position). The trial will also learn about the safety of prolonged prone position compared to intermittent prone position. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does prolonged prone position increase survival compared to intermittent prone position in participants with moderate to severe ARDS ? * How does prolonged prone position compare to intermittent prone position in terms of medical problems associated to prone position ? Researchers will compare prolonged versus intermittent prone position to see which approach is better to treat moderate to severe ARDS. Participants will: * Receive prone position either in prolonged (\> 48 hours) or daily (16 to 24 hours) sessions during the first 7 days * Be followed for up to 90 days to assess their clinical evolution

Spontaneous breathing during the transition from controlled to assisted ventilation in ARDS may be harmful, as high respiratory drive can generate large transpulmonary pressure swings and worsen lung injury. Higher PEEP may mitigate this by reducing inspiratory effort and lung stress, but patient response is variable and difficult to predict. While improved lung compliance appears to mediate the protective effects of PEEP, its bedside assessment is complex. Preclinical data suggest that changes in compliance are inversely reflected by changes in respiratory rate, but this relationship and its clinical utility in ARDS patients remain unclear.

The CALMDOWN trial is a prospective, open-label, multicenter, comparative, controlled trial randomizing patients who received near apneic ventilation vs usual care on ECMO (ultra-protective lung ventilation). The study goal is to investigate the benefit of early apneic ventilation in the most severe forms of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) rescued by ECMO. Indeed, our hypothesis is that that early (near) apneic ventilation on venovenous ECMO for severe ARDS can enhance ventilator injury prevention and therefore reduce ECMO duration and mortality at Day 60.

This study evaluates the safety and potential therapeutic activity of JadiCell™, an investigational umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cell therapy, in patients diagnosed with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). JadiCells are administered intravenously and are intended to modulate inflammatory responses and promote tissue repair in injured lung tissue.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is an inflammatory injury of the lungs caused by various serious illnesses, such as a bacterial or viral lung infection. It is treated by artificial ventilation with the application of positive pressure. Pulmonary injury, coupled with artificial ventilation, can lead to right heart failure which hinders the ejection of blood to the pulmonary circulation. Modern mechanical ventilation modalities have reduced the frequency ("incidence") of this right heart failure in acute respiratory distress syndrome. A large-scale study has shown this a few years ago. However, the evolution of right heart failure during artificial ventilation, and the consequences it has on the patient's cardiovascular status are poorly determined. This study is conducted to improve knowledge in this area. In adult patients hospitalized in intensive care presenting acute respiratory distress syndrome, the investigators will collect the data recorded on cardiac ultrasound, doses of cardiovascular drugs as well as variables reflecting hemodynamic status and cell oxygenation. Data will be collected during the course of ARDS and mechanical ventilation, as well as after weaning from artificial ventilation.

A Phase 2a, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple ascending dose study in patients who are hospitalized with presumed pneumonia requiring supplemental oxygen therapy. The purpose of this study is to examine the safety, tolerability and efficacy of AV-001 Injection administration daily to the earlier of day 28 or EOT (day prior to hospital discharge). A total of 120 eligible patients (20 patients in each of cohort 1, 2 and 3 and 60 patients in cohort 4) will be recruited from up to 25 participating institutions/hospitals. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either AV-001 Injection or AV-001 placebo Injection, together with standard of care (SOC).

This study was conducted to determine the effect of Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell (UC-MSC) and Secretome in severe ARDS patients. The study is a randomized control trial - double blind, which has 3 arms intervention namely, Control treatment, UC-MSC treatment, and UC-MSC and Secretome treatment.

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous (IV) administration of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell derived extracellular vesicles (EVs), ExoFlo, versus placebo for the treatment of hospitalized patients with moderate-to-severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS).