Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Sepsis-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a serious condition where severe infection causes fluid accumulation in the lungs, often requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. Patients with low blood albumin levels are particularly vulnerable to this fluid leakage, leading to prolonged dependence on a ventilator. This observational study evaluates the association between a targeted human albumin treatment strategy combined with clinically guided fluid removal, and clinical outcomes in adults with sepsis-associated ARDS and low blood albumin levels (≤ 30 g/L). Conducted at a single hospital, this study compares two groups. The prospective group consists of patients receiving current usual clinical care, where albumin administration and fluid management are determined by the treating clinical team. Their outcomes will be compared to a historical control group of similar patients who received standard care before this targeted albumin management strategy was routinely implemented. The primary objective is to evaluate whether this targeted albumin strategy is associated with an increase in Ventilator-Free Days at day 28 (VFD-28). VFD-28 reflects both patient survival and successful liberation from the ventilator. The study will also observe secondary outcomes including oxygenation improvement, fluid balance, organ function, mortality, and safety events (e.g., fluid overload or allergic reactions). As an observational study, researchers do not assign treatments; all interventions are based on real-world clinical judgment.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is when a person's lungs become inflamed, which can be caused by infection, trauma, surgery, blood transfusion, or burn. ARDS often leads to a situation where the person cannot breathe independently and needs machines' help. Once the lungs are inflamed, the small air sacs responsible for exchanging gases (i.e., ventilation) and the blood flow in the lungs (i.e., perfusion) can be affected. In the past, most research focused on studying ventilation physiology and how to help people breathe with machines. Less was done on perfusion because it requires imaging techniques such as computed tomography with intravenous contrast and radiation. One treatment option for low oxygen levels is inhaled nitric oxide (iNO), a gas that can dilate the lung blood vessels and improve oxygenation; however, it is not always clear whether this treatment will work. Prone position has been used for several years in the care of ARDS patients and has been demonstrated to improve survival in more severe patients. It is not known how iNO and prone positioning interact in determining the distribution of pulmonary perfusion and whether their combine use can benefit ARDS patients. Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) is a bedside and accessible imaging technique that is radiation-free and non-invasive and can potentially detect changes in lung perfusion. EIT can perform multiple measurements; it is portable and accessible. This prospective interventional study aims to assess changes in regional blood perfusion in the lungs of patients with ARDS in response to iNO and to prone positioning utilizing EIT. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. If EIT can measure lung regional perfusion response to an iNO challenge of 20ppm for 15 minutes. 2. If EIT can measure the lung regional perfusion responses to prone position, applied alone and in combination with iNO. 3. If EIT is comparable to dual-energy computed tomography (DECT), the gold-standard method, in the detection of changes in regional lung perfusion due to iNO. 4. If EIT can be an imaging marker to identify ARDS severity Participants will be divided into three cohorts: 1. Sub-Cohort 1 (n=60): Participants will be asked to be monitored by EIT before, during, and after the administration of iNO (20 ppm) for 15 minutes (OFF-ON-OFF) in the supine position 2. Sub-Cohort 2 (N=10): Participants will be asked to be monitored by EIT before and during the administration of iNO (20 ppm) for 15 minutes (OFF-ON) in both the supine and in the prone position. The same subjects will be monitored also with DECT in the supine position and then after 30 minutes in the prone position (without NO administration). 3. Sub-Cohort 3 (N=10): In this subset of Sub-Cohort 1, subjects will be asked to be monitored also with DECT (in addition to EIT) in the supine body position before iNO and after 15 minutes while receiving iNO.

This study evaluates the safety and potential therapeutic activity of JadiCell™, an investigational umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cell therapy, in patients diagnosed with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). JadiCells are administered intravenously and are intended to modulate inflammatory responses and promote tissue repair in injured lung tissue.

The goal of this prospective observational study is to describe the incidence of reverse trigger (RT) in mechanically ventilated patients with diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The main questions it aims to answer are: * Real incidence of RT based on continuous monitoring * The response to mechanical ventilatiory adjustments Participants will be included as soon as neuromuscular blockers (NMB)/sedation is stopped or in case of spontaneous respiratory efforts detection, whatever happens first. Continuous monitoring will be performed by esophageal manometry until switch to a pressure support (spontaneous) mode, restart of deep sedation/neuromuscular blockers by medical indication, or death. In order to allow detection of possible RT in patients with ongoing sedation/NMB, mechanical ventilator waveforms will be screened every 1-2 hours by investigators and critical care physicians with at least 1 year of specific training in detection of dyssynchronies.

Airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) is a time-cycled, pressure controlled, intermittent mandatory ventilation mode with extreme inverse I:E ratios. Currently it is considered as a non-conventional ventilatory mode. The investigators aim to compare APRV with conventional mechanical ventilation (MV) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

PrismaLung+ is a sterile, single-use medical device aimed at performing partial removal of carbon dioxide (CO2) from the patient's venous blood via diffusion through a membrane. The goal of this prospective, open label, randomized controlled study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PrismaLung+ on extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R) in critically ill patients under invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Patients will be randomized to receive either IMV combined with ECCO2R (using PrismaLung+) in the study group or IMV alone in the control group, at a ratio of 2:1.

We attempt to perform dynamic endotyping of critically ill patients presenting in the emergency department with de novo acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF). We also attempt to identify what clinical, radiological, physiological and biological variables collected early in the course of AHRF correlate with subsequent mortality and/or persistent severe hypoxemia.

BTI-203 is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, Phase 2 proof-of-concept (POC) study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rhu-pGSN plus standard of care (SOC) in subjects with moderate-to-severe ARDS (P/F ratio ≤150) due to pneumonia or other infections. Potential subjects hospitalized with pneumonia or other infections are to be screened within 24 hours of diagnosis of ARDS.

This is a single-center, prospective, randomized, three-period crossover physiological study in adult patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS, PaO₂/FiO₂ ≤150 mmHg). Each enrolled subject will receive all three APRV ventilation conditions in random sequence: low-level spontaneous breathing (spontaneous minute-ventilation proportion 10%-30%), high-level spontaneous breathing (31%-50%), and fully suppressed spontaneous breathing as control. A 30-minute wash-out period is set between each condition to restore unified physiological baseline. Primary outcome is ventilation-perfusion mismatch percentage (mismatch%) measured by Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT). Secondary outcomes include EIT-derived pulmonary parameters, respiratory mechanics, hemodynamics, diaphragmatic function and safety profiles. Only short-term, reversible ventilator and sedation adjustments will be performed; routine clinical management remains unchanged throughout the trial.

The pilot study will randomize 40 ARDS patients who if proning were required would be randomized to upright bed positioning or to stand of care with bed in the head of bed elevation position

This prospective cohort study aims to evaluate whether blood levels of soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products (sRAGE), Club Cell Protein-16 (CC16), and Syndecan-1 measured early after severe chest trauma can predict the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and in-hospital mortality. Adult patients aged 18 years or older admitted with severe blunt or penetrating chest trauma will be enrolled. Clinical data, injury severity, laboratory findings, imaging results, and clinical outcomes will be recorded. Patients will be followed daily during the first 7 days after admission for the development of ARDS, and in-hospital mortality will be recorded until discharge or death. The findings may help identify patients at high risk of respiratory complications and poor outcomes after severe chest trauma.

This is a Phase 2 multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study that will evaluate the safety and efficacy of host-directed therapeutics in hospitalized adults diagnosed with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) utilizing a platform trial design. Participants will be randomized to receive either a placebo or one of the active treatments. This record describes the default procedures and analyses for all cohorts. Each specific cohort may have additional eligibility requirements, safety and efficacy procedures, or endpoints, which will be described in the corresponding intervention-specific records on clinicaltrials.gov listed below in the detailed description.

This is a Phase 2 multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study that will evaluate the safety and efficacy of host-directed therapeutics in hospitalized adults diagnosed with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) utilizing a platform trial design. Cohort A: Participants will be randomized to receive either a placebo or vilobelimab. This record describes the default procedures and analyses for Cohort A. Please see NCT06703073 for information on the BP-ARDS-P2-001 Master Protocol.

This is a Phase 2 multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study that will evaluate the safety and efficacy of host-directed therapeutics in hospitalized adults diagnosed with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) utilizing a platform trial design. Cohort B: Participants will be randomized to receive either a placebo or paridiprubart. This record describes the default procedures and analyses for Cohort B. Please see NCT06703073 for information on the BP-ARDS-P2-001 Master Protocol.

This is a Phase 2 multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study that will evaluate the safety and efficacy of host-directed therapeutics in hospitalized adults diagnosed with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) utilizing a platform trial design. Cohort C: Participants will be randomized to receive either a placebo or bevacizumab. This record describes the default procedures and analyses for Cohort C. Please see NCT06703073 for information on the BP-ARDS-P2-001 Master Protocol.

Many patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for a severe lung disease called acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) require mechanical ventilation and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to improve their oxygenation. Ventilator settings-and particularly the level of PEEP-are critical in the management of these patients. In fact, inappropriate ventilator settings can lead to a worsening of the patients' lung disease or compromise their hemodynamic status. PEEP is a pressure maintained by the ventilator during the patient's exhalation to keep the alveoli open throughout the respiratory cycle. When PEEP is increased, if many alveoli open, this is called alveolar recruitment, which is the expected beneficial effect. However, in some patients, increasing PEEP can cause already-open alveoli to become overdistended without opening new alveoli; this is known as pulmonary overdistension. This phenomenon of overdistension will worsen the patient's pulmonary condition and may also lead to hemodynamic deterioration. To date, numerous techniques have been proposed for determining the optimal PEP level (alveolar recruitment without pulmonary overdistension) in these patients, but none can be recommended as the gold standard. The objective of our study is therefore to compare the various existing methods for determining the optimal PEEP level, in order to determine whether these methods are interchangeable and which would be the best method to use to optimize the care of these patients. To this end, the investigators plan to conduct a prospective, observational, multicenter study in the Intensive Care Units of the Nice University Hospital and the European Hospital of Marseille. Patients on mechanical ventilation for ARDS will be included in the study, and medical and laboratory data from the electronic medical records obtained during the various PEEP measurements to determine the optimal PEEP will be analyzed.

Hospitalized patients with ARDS will be randomized to intravenous treatment with a monoclonal antibody against CD14, called IC14, or placebo. They will be followed for 28 days. The primary outcome is the day 4 oxygenation index assessed as a continuous measure.

This prospective, randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate whether an AI-driven decision support system can improve clinical outcomes for mechanically ventilated pediatric patients (aged 1 month to 18 years) in the PICU, compared to standard care. The primary question addressed is: Do patients whose ventilator parameter optimization decisions are guided by AI assistance achieve a greater number of ventilator-free days within 28 days compared to those managed with standard care by medical staff? Eligible pediatric patients requiring mechanical ventilation following tracheal intubation will be randomly assigned (1:1) to either the AI-guided intervention group or the standard care control group. In the intervention group, physicians will receive real-time, AI-generated recommendations for ventilator parameters to inform clinical adjustments. In contrast, the control group will be managed according to standard clinical protocols. This study seeks to assess whether AI-driven ventilator optimization can effectively improve clinical outcomes and shorten ventilation duration for pediatric patients in the PICU.

China faces major challenges in the ECMO management of patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS, including substantial heterogeneity in clinical practice, low weaning success rates, and high complication rates. A key underlying reason is the lack of a standardized full-course management pathway that is applicable to real-world clinical practice in China. This study focuses on the construction and evidence-based evaluation of a precision full-course ECMO management pathway for patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS, aiming to address fragmented care processes and delayed quality improvement. The study includes three main components. First, multidisciplinary consensus and evidence-based findings will be integrated to develop a standardized management pathway covering the full chain of assessment, initiation, maintenance, weaning, and rehabilitation. Second, a nationwide multicenter real-world study with a before-and-after design will be conducted to systematically evaluate the clinical effectiveness of this pathway in reducing mortality and complications and improving patient outcomes. Third, a closed-loop dynamic optimization system based on "pathway-data-feedback-improvement" will be established. With the support of an intelligent data platform and multidisciplinary review mechanisms, the pathway will be continuously updated and refined. Through this study, a reproducible, traceable, and evaluable full-course ECMO management strategy is expected to be established. The study will also build a national collaborative research network and support the development of living clinical guidance, promoting the transition of ECMO care in China from experience-based practice toward standardized, homogeneous, and intelligent management, and providing a key technical framework and practical model for improving critical care.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a common and life-threatening condition in intensive care units, characterized by substantial biological and clinical heterogeneity. Differences in patients' inflammatory responses, baseline immune function, and organ failure patterns contribute to variability in ARDS severity, treatment response, and clinical outcomes. Precision classification of ARDS based on biological and inflammatory characteristics may therefore be essential for improving patient outcomes. Previous analyses of randomized clinical trials have identified two reproducible inflammatory subphenotypes-"hyperinflammatory" and "hypoinflammatory"-which differ in organ dysfunction profiles, clinical trajectories, and responses to treatments such as fluid management strategies, corticosteroids, and ventilatory interventions. However, key uncertainties remain, including whether these inflammatory subphenotypes can be validated in Chinese ARDS populations, how various bedside prediction models perform in identifying these subphenotypes, and whether model-based subphenotype identification can guide individualized treatment decisions. This multicenter cohort study aims to: (1) validate inflammatory subphenotypes of ARDS using latent class analysis; (2) compare the predictive performance of existing bedside models for subphenotype identification; and (3) assess whether subphenotype assignment based on prediction models can guide individualized treatment strategies, including fluid management, PEEP titration, and corticosteroid use. In addition to these primary aims, the study may include other exploratory objectives, such as evaluating subphenotype stability over time, characterizing biological pathways associated with subphenotypes, and assessing additional treatment-response patterns to support future precision ARDS management strategies.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome is characterized by heterogeneous lung injury, with dependent regions often collapsed and non-dependent regions relatively well-aerated, forming the so called "baby lung." Mechanical ventilation, while essential, can induce additional lung injury (VILI) via overdistension (baro/volutrauma) or repetitive alveolar collapse (atelectrauma). Protective ventilation strategies with low tidal volumes (VT 6-8 mL/kg predicted body weight, PBW) reduce mortality, but their efficacy relies on accurate PBW estimation, which is derived from patient height. In critical care, height measurement is often challenging, and common methods such as visual estimation or tape measurement can be inaccurate, leading to inappropriate VT settings and increased risk of lung stress and VILI. Alternative methods, including heel-to-knee distance and laser measurement, may offer more precise PBW estimation, yet their impact on lung mechanics in ARDS remains unexplored. This study addresses the knowledge gap by evaluating whether differences in height measurement methods significantly affect lung stress, tidal volume distribution, and ventilatory mechanics in ARDS patients. Patients' heights will be measured using five methods (stadiometer, visual, tape, laser, heel-to knee). Corresponding PBW and tidal volumes (VT = 6 mL/kg PBW) will be calculated and applied in randomized order, each for 30 minutes. Lung stress, ventilatory mechanics, gas exchange, and regional ventilation distribution will be assessed for each VT setting, preceded by a short alveolar recruitment maneuver. During the study, continuous monitoring of hemodynamics and oxygenation will be performed. Ventilatory parameters including plateau pressure, driving pressure, and transpulmonary pressures will be recorded. Electrical impedance tomography will assess regional tidal volume distribution. Each patient's participation is limited to approximately two hours with no further follow-up.

The goal of this interventional study is to compare standard mechanical ventilation to a lung-stress oriented ventilation strategy in patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). Participants will be ventilated according to one of two different strategies. The main question the study hopes to answer is whether the personalized ventilation strategy helps improve survival.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if R-3750 is safe in \[in patients with late-stage, non-resolving Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) . The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are: 1. the favorable safety profile 2. clinical improvement that includes reduced ventilator dependence and improved lung function. Participants will be given oral capsules daily and/or enteral nasogastric or orogastric (NG/OG tube) if necessary.

This study will investigate how different types of routine sedation may affect patient's breathing whilst on a ventilator in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). There are different approaches to sedation which may have advantages and disadvantages. During the study patients will receive both intravenous and inhaled volatile sedation (similar to anaesthetic 'gases' used for general anaesthesia) and the drive to breath, breathing efforts and function of the lung will be assessed.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether methylprednisolone improves outcomes in critically ill patients with a hyperinflammatory phenotype. It will also evaluate the safety of methylprednisolone at different doses. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does methylprednisolone improve organ function compared with placebo? * Does methylprednisolone reduce the risk of mortality within 30 days? Researchers will compare high-dose methylprednisolone (160mg/d), low-dose methylprednisolone (80mg/d), and placebo (normal saline) to evaluate effectiveness and safety. Participants will: * Receive high-dose methylprednisolone, low-dose methylprednisolone, or placebo every 12 hours for the first 3 days * Be reassessed on Day 4 based on their inflammatory status If the hyperinflammatory phenotype persists, the treatment dose will be reduced by half and continued until Day 7 or ICU discharge, whichever occurs first If the patient transitions to a hypoinflammatory phenotype, the study treatment will be discontinued * Be monitored daily in the intensive care unit for organ function, inflammatory status, and need for organ support * Be followed for up to 30 days after randomization to assess survival and recovery