COMPARISON OF FANS VS CONVENTIONAL URETERAL ACCESS SHEATH in RIRS on POSTOPERATIVE ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY

ConditionUrolithiasis
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorNamik Kemal University

About this trial

Kidney stone disease is a common condition, and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is a minimally invasive procedure frequently used to remove kidney stones. During RIRS, pressure inside the kidney can increase, which may contribute to temporary kidney injury. New aspiration-enabled access sheath systems have been developed to better control this pressure by continuously removing irrigation fluid during surgery. This study will compare aspiration and conventional access sheath systems to determine whether improved pressure control reduces early kidney injury. Blood and urine biomarkers (IL-18 and L-FABP), which can detect kidney damage earlier than standard kidney function tests, will be measured before and after surgery. The results may help identify surgical techniques that better protect kidney function and improve the safety of kidney stone treatment for patients.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Being 18 years of age or older

Having a planned RIRS operation

Providing written informed consent

Disqualifiers

Patients who do not give consent

Patients who will undergo combined surgery

Patients who have previously undergone endoscopic stone surgery

Being under 18 years of age

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • flexible and navigable ureteral access sheath
  • conventional ureteral access sheath

Treatment groups

108 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators