Urolithiasis

The goal of this clinical trial study is to test if patients with idiopathic calcium oxalate kidney stones have an increased absorption of dietary oxalate, which would lead to increased urinary excretion of oxalate. The study will recruit adult patients with a history of calcium oxalate kidney stones and healthy volunteers without kidney stones. Participants will * ingest fixed diets containing low and moderately high amounts of oxalate for 5 days at a time * ingest a soluble form of oxalate and sugar preparations to test gut permeability * collect urine, blood, stool and breath sample during the fixed diets and the soluble oxalate test

The goal of this trial is to test if colonization with the gut bacteria Oxalobacter formigenes leads to a reduction in urinary oxalate excretion in patients with calcium oxalate kidney stone disease. The study will recruit adult participants with a history of calcium oxalate kidney stones who are not colonized with Oxalobacter formigenes. Participants will * ingest fixed diets containing low and moderately high amounts of oxalate for 4 days at a time * collect urine, blood and stool samples during the fixed diets * ingest a preparation of live Oxalobacter formigenes to induce colonization with Oxalobacter formigenes

Before kidney stone surgery with a flexible or semirigid ureteroscope, patients must read and sign a written consent form, but many patients find these forms long and hard to understand. This study tests whether listening to an audio recording of the same consent form, in addition to the usual written form and the surgeon's explanation, helps patients understand the operation better. It also asks whether it matters if the recording is read by a real urologist or produced by artificial intelligence (AI) from a clone of that same urologist's voice. Adults scheduled for their first ureteroscopy or retrograde intrarenal surgery at three hospitals in Turkey will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: (A) standard written consent only, (B) standard consent plus an audio recording read by a urologist, or (C) standard consent plus the same text produced by an AI-cloned version of the same urologist's voice. All three groups receive exactly the same information, word for word; only the way it is delivered differs. Patients in group C are told that the voice was produced by AI. The main outcome is a 10-question knowledge test on the content of the consent form, taken immediately after the consent process. Anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory) and satisfaction are also measured on the same day. No forms are completed on the day of surgery.

This prospective observational case-control study aims to evaluate the presence and burden of microplastic particles in urine samples from patients with kidney and ureteral stones and to compare these findings with healthy controls. The study will also investigate the associations between urinary microplastic burden and clinical characteristics of urinary stone disease, including stone size, stone density measured in Hounsfield units (HU), localization, and stone composition.

Upper urinary tract stone obstruction complicated by acute pyelonephritis is a critical urological emergency requiring urgent decompression and infection control, yet real-world clinical decisions regarding the choice between retrograde ureteral stenting, percutaneous nephrostomy, or initial antibiotic therapy often vary based on physician experience and resource availability. This prospective, multi-center, observational study aims to enroll 1,650 patients across more than 30 hospitals in China to systematically evaluate the technical success rates, infection control efficacy, and safety profiles of these different management strategies. By analyzing natural clinical cohorts without intervening in routine practice, the study seeks to define the optimal application boundaries for retrograde stenting, evaluate the role of nephrostomy as a primary or salvage treatment, and establish risk models to predict the failure of conservative antibiotic therapy, ultimately providing high-level evidence for individualized and precise clinical decision-making.

This study evaluates and compares two minimally invasive surgical approaches for treating bladder stones in adult patients: transurethral cystolithotripsy (TUCL) and percutaneous cystolithotripsy (PCCL). Urinary bladder stones are commonly managed using endoscopic techniques to avoid the morbidity of open surgery. TUCL accesses the bladder through the natural urinary channel (urethra), whereas PCCL accesses the bladder directly through a small puncture in the lower abdomen above the pubic bone. While both approaches are effective, comparative data in adult populations remain limited. Eligible participants are randomly assigned to receive either TUCL or PCCL. The primary goal is to compare stone clearance rates and operative times between the two procedures. Secondary objectives include comparing surgical complication rates, duration of postoperative urinary catheterization, and length of hospital stay.

Urinary stone disease is globally prevalent with rising incidence and recurrence, imposing heavy socioeconomic burdens. Flexible ureteroscopy has advanced stone treatment. Single-use flexible ureteroscopes (su-fURS) combined with negative pressure ureteral access sheath (NPUAS), recommended by urology guidelines, improve surgical safety and stone-free rates and can treat stones ≤3 cm. However, su-fURS has poorer image quality, bleeding during lithotripsy may blur vision, frequently impairing efficiency and safety. Norepinephrine (NE), a tyrosine-derived sympathomimetic amine, mainly activates α1 and β1 receptors. Doses above 3 μg/min trigger predominant α1-mediated vasoconstriction of arteries and veins. It can act on mucosal surfaces via irrigation fluid, making it favorable for initial hemostasis of injured mucosa. Firstly, this study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-concentration norepinephrine (NE) irrigation solution for hemostasis during lithotripsy performed with single-use flexible ureteroscope (su-fURS) combined with NPUAS, fifteen subjects will be enrolled in the study. Secondly, we explore the dose-effect relationships of four concentrations: 2 mg/3 L, 4 mg/3 L, 6 mg/3 L and 8 mg/3 L, and determine the optimal concentration by comprehensively evaluating hemostatic efficacy and safety. A total of 40 subjects will be enrolled, with 10 subjects in each concentration.

The goal of this clinical trial study is to test if patients with idiopathic calcium oxalate kidney stones have an increased production of oxalate by the body, which would lead to increased urinary excretion of oxalate. The study will recruit adult patients with a history of calcium oxalate kidney stones and healthy volunteers without kidney stones. Participants will ingest fixed diets containing low amounts of oxalate for 5 days ingest a soluble form of glycolate and vitamin C collect urine, blood, stool during the dietary and oral dosing portions of the study and also collect breath sample during the oral glycolate test

This retrospective comparative cohort study will include adult patients who underwent primary RIRS for renal stones ≤20 mm at Al-Azhar University Hospitals between January 2020 and December 2025. Patients will be classified by whether a ureteral access sheath (UAS) was used during the index RIRS, and all eligible patients will be invited for active long-term follow-up (minimum 12 months) to assess the composite outcome of delayed ipsilateral ureteral stricture or new/progressive ipsilateral hydronephrosis and other safety and efficacy outcomes. Propensity-score methods and adjusted regression analyses will be used to control confounding.

Background: Ureteral stent-related symptoms vary considerably among patients despite similar surgical procedures and stent characteristics. Although several mechanisms have been proposed, the reasons for this interindividual variability remain incompletely understood. Pelvic floor muscle endurance may represent one of the patient-related factors contributing to symptom severity. The Pelvic Floor Fatigue Index (PFFI) is a novel ultrasound-based index developed to quantify pelvic floor muscle endurance by measuring the percentage decline in bladder base elevation during a sustained maximum voluntary pelvic floor contraction using suprapubic transverse B-mode ultrasonography. This prospective observational study aims to clinically evaluate the PFFI by investigating the association between preoperative PFFI measurements and postoperative ureteral stent-related symptoms assessed using the Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ). In addition, the study will evaluate the test-retest reliability of the PFFI measurement method and explore its potential role as an objective functional assessment tool for pelvic floor muscle endurance. The findings of this study are expected to provide the first clinical evaluation of the PFFI and establish the methodological basis for future validation studies and broader clinical applications.

This prospective randomized controlled trial aims to compare the analgesic efficacy of three non-opioid analgesics (ibuprofen, paracetamol, and tenoxicam) during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). All patients undergoing ESWL will be randomly assigned into four groups including a placebo group. Pain intensity will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at the 5th, 10th, 15th, and 20th minutes during the procedure. In addition to comparing analgesic efficacy, the study will evaluate patient-related and stone-related factors affecting pain perception, including body mass index, subcutaneous fat thickness, and stone density measured by Hounsfield Units. The study also aims to assess the relationship between analgesic efficacy, energy levels applied during ESWL, and treatment outcomes such as stone-free rates. The findings may contribute to optimizing individualized pain management strategies and improving treatment efficiency in ESWL procedures.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a specialized formula of phytotherapeutic extracts (Neorenal Forte) aiding the complete elimination of residual fragments after fURS in adults.

This observational study aims to test how well a specific medical scoring tool, called a nomogram, can predict the success of a common minimally invasive surgery for kidney stones. The surgery being studied is flexible ureterorenoscopy (fURS), which is widely used to treat stones in the kidney and the upper part of the ureter. In this study, procedural success is defined as a patient being completely stone-free after their surgery. While fURS is highly effective, the chances of completely clearing all stones can vary from person to person based on individual factors like stone size, stone volume, and anatomical characteristics. Researchers want to determine if this nomogram can accurately estimate a patient's personalized chance of achieving a stone-free outcome before the intervention takes place. Participants in this study will be adult patients who are already scheduled to undergo fURS as part of their standard medical care. Because this is an observational study, there are no experimental treatments, participants will receive their normal surgical care. During the study, the research team will collect standard clinical information, including: * Preoperative data such as age, body mass index (BMI), blood tests, and CT scan results. * Operative details during the surgery, such as the time it takes, the experience level of the surgeon, and the laser settings used to break up the stones. * Postoperative outcomes, specifically reviewing follow-up imaging to check for the presence and size of any remaining stone fragments. By comparing the nomogram's preoperative predictions to the patients' actual surgical results, the researchers hope to validate the tool's accuracy. Confirming the reliability of this tool could help doctors better plan individualized treatments, avoid unnecessary procedures, and improve how they counsel future patients regarding their expected surgical outcomes.

A single-arm, multicenter, international, prospective interventional study designed to evaluate the safety and performance of an investigational device during retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of renal calculi.

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare Steerable Ureteroscopic Renal Evacuation (SURE) using the CVAC System and standard ureteroscopy (URS) with laser lithotripsy for the treatment of urolithiasis. This is a prospective, randomized (1:1), multi-center study.

This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effects of two-tier virtual reality-based preoperative education on anxiety, learning knowledge, self-care ability, and cognitive load in patients undergoing urolithiasis surgery. Participants will be randomly assigned to routine education, standard virtual reality education, or two-tier virtual reality education groups. Outcomes will be assessed using anxiety scales, knowledge questionnaires, self-care ability measures, and cognitive load assessments before and after the intervention.

Kidney stone disease is a common condition, and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is a minimally invasive procedure frequently used to remove kidney stones. During RIRS, pressure inside the kidney can increase, which may contribute to temporary kidney injury. New aspiration-enabled access sheath systems have been developed to better control this pressure by continuously removing irrigation fluid during surgery. This study will compare aspiration and conventional access sheath systems to determine whether improved pressure control reduces early kidney injury. Blood and urine biomarkers (IL-18 and L-FABP), which can detect kidney damage earlier than standard kidney function tests, will be measured before and after surgery. The results may help identify surgical techniques that better protect kidney function and improve the safety of kidney stone treatment for patients.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether the ClearPetra ureteral access sheath (Coloplast) is more effective than the Navigator ureteral access sheath (Boston Scientific) in treating intrarenal kidney stones of 1-3 cm in adult patients undergoing flexible ureteroscopy (RIRS). The main questions it aims to answer are: Does ClearPetra achieve a higher stone-free rate at 1 month post-intervention compared to Navigator, as assessed by non-contrast abdominal-pelvic CT scan? Does ClearPetra reduce total surgical time compared to Navigator? Does ClearPetra lower the retreatment rate at 3 months compared to Navigator? Does ClearPetra present a rate of clinically significant complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ II) that is lower than or similar to Navigator? Researchers will compare flexible ureteroscopy using the ClearPetra vacuum-assisted flexible ureteral access sheath to flexible ureteroscopy using the Navigator standard rigid ureteral access sheath, to see if ClearPetra leads to higher stone clearance rates while maintaining a comparable safety profile. Participants will: Undergo flexible ureteroscopy (RIRS) using one of two randomly assigned ureteral access sheaths (ClearPetra or Navigator), determined by computer-generated randomization immediately before surgery Have a non-contrast abdominal-pelvic CT scan at 1 month post-intervention to assess stone-free status Have a non-contrast abdominal-pelvic CT scan at 3 months post-intervention to evaluate residual fragments and the need for retreatment Attend follow-up visits at 1 month and 3 months post-surgery for clinical assessment and complication recording The study will be conducted at the Urology Department of Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío (Seville, Spain), a tertiary reference centre. A total of 156 patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio (78 per group), with pre-defined subgroup analyses stratified by stone size (1-2 cm vs. \>2 cm). The outcome assessor evaluating CT images for stone-free rate will be blinded to treatment allocation (single-blind).

Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a non-invasive standard treatment for kidney stones. This study will be conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of ESWL using MODULITH® SLX-F2 with stone tracking, compared to MODULITH® SLX-F2 without stone tracking, in adult patients with kidney stones, as measured by stone-free status.

Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is a widely used treatment for kidney stones; however, postoperative infectious complications remain a significant concern. This prospective randomized factorial trial aims to evaluate whether gentamicin-containing irrigation fluid and the use of a suction ureteral access sheath can reduce postoperative fever, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), and sepsis after RIRS. The study will also investigate the independent and combined effects of these two interventions on infectious outcomes.

This prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial will compare stent-related symptoms after placement of a ComfiJ ureteral stent versus a conventional double-J ureteral stent in adult patients undergoing unilateral ureteroscopy or retrograde intrarenal surgery for urinary stones when short-term postoperative ureteral stenting is clinically indicated. Eligible patients will be randomized intraoperatively after the operating surgeon confirms the need for postoperative stenting. The primary outcome will be the Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire urinary symptoms domain score on postoperative day 14 before planned stent removal.

This study will compare L-citrulline and tamsulosin as medical expulsive therapy for adults with single distal ureteral stones. Eligible participants with a single distal ureteral stone measuring 5 to 10 mm will be randomly assigned to receive either oral L-citrulline 750 mg twice daily or oral tamsulosin 0.4 mg once daily. Treatment will continue until documented stone passage or completion of 4 weeks of therapy, whichever occurs first. Participants will be followed weekly for up to 4 weeks. The main outcome is stone expulsion within 4 weeks. The study will also assess time to stone expulsion, pain episodes, analgesic use, need for additional intervention, and adverse events.

Objective: To improve quality-of-life and health care delivery to patients receiving ureteral stents. Specific Aims: Evaluate the feasibility, practicality, and qualitative outcomes of utilizing intra-nasal ketorolac in patients with indwelling ureteral stents (Phase I), followed by a randomized trial comparing two non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, intra-nasal Ketorolac versus oral Diclofenac. Hypotheses: Due to its favorable pharmacokinetics in relieving acute pain, investigators expect improved pain scores and a lower rate of unplanned clinical encounters in patients receiving intra-nasal ketorolac compared to those taking oral diclofenac following ureteroscopic surgery for urolithiasis. Study Rationale: Following ureteroscopic management of urolithiasis, patient with indwelling ureter stents have higher levels of discomfort compared to those without a ureter stent. Prior studies showed that intramuscular Ketorolac at time of ureter stent removal decreased the incidence of unplanned clinical encounters. Furthermore, onset of analgesic effect by intra-nasal ketorolac is faster than its oral form, and similar its intramuscular and intravenous counterparts.

This study, as a prospective, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority, international multicenter clinical trial, aims to evaluate whether a strategy of no antimicrobial prophylaxis is non-inferior to the traditional single-dose prophylaxis regimen in patients with a low risk of infection undergoing single-use flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy combined with a flexible negative-pressure suction sheath. It is anticipated that this will have a substantial impact on infection prevention strategies in urological surgery.

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Steerable Ureteroscopic Renal Evacuation (SURE) with the CVAC System versus other commonly used renal-stone interventions.