Comparison of Fractional FLOW Reserve Outcomes With Drug-Coated Balloon-Based Versus Drug-Eluting Stent-Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Strategies

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age19+
SponsorKorea University Guro Hospital

About this trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to find out whether a treatment strategy based on a drug-coated balloon (DCB) achieves coronary artery function at 6 months that is not worse than a strategy using only drug-eluting stents (DES) by more than a prespecified amount. The study will enroll adults undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for a new coronary artery narrowing (de novo lesion).

The main questions are:

1. Is fractional flow reserve (FFR) at 6 months noninferior after DCB-based PCI compared with DES-only PCI? FFR is a pressure-based measure used to assess blood flow through a coronary artery. 2. Does the DCB-based strategy reduce the number and total length of stents implanted? 3. What cardiovascular events or medical problems, such as cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, repeat coronary procedures, or bleeding, occur during follow-up?

Investigators will randomly assign 100 participants to one of two treatment strategies. In the DCB-based group, the lesion will first be prepared with a balloon. A DCB will be used if lesion preparation produces a suitable result; a DES may be implanted if needed to achieve a safe and adequate result. In the DES-only group, the lesion will be treated with a DES.

Participants will:

1. Receive treatment according to their assigned strategy. 2. Undergo follow-up coronary angiography and FFR measurement at approximately 6 months. For clinical reasons, this examination may take place up to 9 months after the procedure. 3. Be followed for cardiovascular events through 12 months after randomization.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Adults aged 19 years or older.

Patients requiring coronary revascularization for angina or myocardial infarction.

A target or culprit lesion suitable for both DCB and DES treatment.

Reference vessel diameter of the target or culprit lesion ≥2.25 mm.

Disqualifiers

Active bleeding, a clinically significant bleeding tendency, or a coagulation disorder.

Hypersensitivity or a contraindication to aspirin, P2Y12 inhibitors, or components of a DES or DCB (drug, polymer, or metal).

Refractory cardiogenic shock.

Target lesion in ISR (in-stent restenosis).

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Drug-coated balloon-based intervention

    Device

    In the DCB-based PCI group, lesion preparation may include conventional, non-compliant, cutting, or scoring balloons and, when needed, other calcium-modification techniques. An adequately prepared lesion has expansion with a balloon-to-vessel diameter ratio of at least 0.90, residual diameter stenosis of 30% or less, TIMI grade 3 flow, and no flow-limiting dissection or risk of vessel closure. When these conditions are met, the operator will use a paclitaxel-coated DCB (SeQuent Please NEO), sized approximately 1:1 to the reference vessel and covering the prepared segment. DCB delivery within 30 seconds and inflation for 30-60 seconds are recommended when clinically tolerated. DES implantation is permitted for inadequate flow, residual stenosis greater than 30%, substantial recoil, a major dissection, or another procedural reason requiring immediate stenting. Such stenting is part of the assigned DCB-based strategy, not a treatment crossover.

  • Drug-eluting stent-based intervention

    Device

    In the DES-only PCI group, the target or culprit lesion will be treated with a contemporary newer-generation DES according to clinical practice.

Treatment groups

100 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: DCB-based PCI groupExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: DES-only PCI groupActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Distal FFR at the target or culprit lesion

Follow-up coronary angiography will be performed at 6 months (±30 days; up to 9 months if necessary), and distal FFR beyond the target or culprit lesion will be measured with a commercially available pressure wire as the primary outcome.

Time frame
6 months (±30 days; up to 9 months if necessary)

Secondary outcomes

1

Trans-lesion ΔFFR

Difference between FFR measured proximal and distal to the target or culprit lesion.

Time frame
6 months (±30 days; up to 9 months if necessary)
2

Intermediate-term pressure gain (exploratory)

Change in distal FFR from baseline to follow-up in patients with a preprocedural FFR measurement.

Time frame
6 months (±30 days; up to 9 months if necessary)
3

Overall stent burden

Between-group differences in the total number and length of implanted stents

Time frame
Immediately after index procedure
4

Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) measures

Between-group differences in minimum lumen diameter and percentage diameter stenosis of the target or culprit lesion

Time frame
6 months (±30 days; up to 9 months if necessary)

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Korea University Guro Hospital

Lead sponsor

B. Braun Melsungen AG

Collaborator

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: