Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

This study aimes to compare the clinical outcomes of drug-coated balloon-based percutaneous coronary intervention (DCB-based PCI) and drug-eluting stent-based percutaneous coronary intervention (DES-based PCI) in patients with multivessel coronary artery lesions measuring 2.25 mm to 4.0 mm in diameter through a prospective, multicenter, active-controlled, randomized, investigator-initiated clinical trial.

DAN-RELEASE is a national, randomized, registry-based trial including 7,000 participants in Denmark. The trial aims to determine whether discontinuation of long-term aspirin therapy is non-inferior to continued aspirin therapy in older adults with stable ischemic heart disease. Long-term aspirin therapy is recommended for patients with established ischemic heart disease. However, among clinically stable patients years after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), or myocardial infarction (MI), the evidence supporting lifelong aspirin therapy is limited. At the same time, the risk of serious bleeding increases with age. DAN-RELEASE will therefore compare aspirin discontinuation with continued aspirin therapy in adults aged 65 years or older with stable ischemic heart disease who have remained free from ischemic events for at least two years. The trial will assess whether discontinuing aspirin is non-inferior to continued treatment with respect to cardiovascular and bleeding outcomes.

V-INTERVENTION will evaluate the effectiveness of inclisiran in preventing major cardiovascular and limb events in patients receiving percutaneous coronary or peripheral arterial revascularization. Inclisiran is a subcutaneous, twice-yearly injection that is FDA-approved as an adjunct with statin therapy and on the market to lower LDL-C in high-risk populations.

This is a randomized, open-label, active-controlled, non-inferiority clinical trial (the ASPIRE-LD trial) conducted in China. It aims to compare the efficacy and safety of low-dose aspirin (50 mg once daily) versus standard-dose aspirin (100 mg once daily), both in combination with a P2Y12 inhibitor, in patients who have successfully undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and plan to receive at least 12 months of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). A total of 2640 eligible patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 50 mg or 100 mg of enteric-coated aspirin daily, plus a P2Y12 inhibitor (ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily or clopidogrel 75 mg once daily, prescribed according to routine clinical practice). All participants will be followed for 12 months after randomization. The primary goal is to verify that 50 mg aspirin is non-inferior to the 100 mg standard dose in preventing major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE: cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, definite/probable stent thrombosis, and ischemic stroke) at 12 months post-PCI. If non-inferiority is confirmed, the study will further test whether 50 mg aspirin reduces clinically relevant bleeding events (BARC type 2, 3, or 5) better than the standard dose. The study is sponsored by the First Hospital of Jilin University and will be carried out in 10-15 tertiary hospitals across China. Its findings will provide evidence for optimizing aspirin dosing in post-PCI DAPT.

The goal of this clinical trial is to find out whether a treatment strategy based on a drug-coated balloon (DCB) achieves coronary artery function at 6 months that is not worse than a strategy using only drug-eluting stents (DES) by more than a prespecified amount. The study will enroll adults undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for a new coronary artery narrowing (de novo lesion). The main questions are: 1. Is fractional flow reserve (FFR) at 6 months noninferior after DCB-based PCI compared with DES-only PCI? FFR is a pressure-based measure used to assess blood flow through a coronary artery. 2. Does the DCB-based strategy reduce the number and total length of stents implanted? 3. What cardiovascular events or medical problems, such as cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, repeat coronary procedures, or bleeding, occur during follow-up? Investigators will randomly assign 100 participants to one of two treatment strategies. In the DCB-based group, the lesion will first be prepared with a balloon. A DCB will be used if lesion preparation produces a suitable result; a DES may be implanted if needed to achieve a safe and adequate result. In the DES-only group, the lesion will be treated with a DES. Participants will: 1. Receive treatment according to their assigned strategy. 2. Undergo follow-up coronary angiography and FFR measurement at approximately 6 months. For clinical reasons, this examination may take place up to 9 months after the procedure. 3. Be followed for cardiovascular events through 12 months after randomization.

The FAVOR V AMI study is a prospective, multicenter, blinded, randomized, sham-controlled trial comparing the long-term clinical outcomes of the "Functional and Angiography-derived Strain inTegration (FAST)" technique (next-generation quantitative flow ratio \[μQFR\] and radial wall strain \[RWS\]) guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) strategy, with standard treatment strategy, in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary disease (MVD).

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of intra-coronary administration of nicorandil on the prevention of lowering of coronary blood flow for high-risk plaque lesions defined as the high value of lipid core burden index in patients with coronary artery disease who require stent treatment.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of coronary thrombus modification on preventing the microvascular damage associated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and to limit the associated myocardial damage assessed by myocardial salvage index after 3 months. Furthermore, the project will evaluate coronary microvascular damage assessed invasively using both continuous and bolus thermodilution before and after stent implantation. In addition, the project will evaluate the diagnostic ability and associations of pre-stenting invasive physiological measurement to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging measurements.

The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of novel P-CAB (tegoprazan 50 mg once daily) as compared with standard PPI (rabeprazole 20 mg once daily) for protection of GI events in patients with known cardiac and vascular disease receiving chronic use of antithrombotic drugs (either antiplatelets, OAC, and its combinations) who are at high GI bleeding risk. The primary hypothesis is that P-CAB (experimental arm) would non-inferior to PPI (standard arm) with respect to the rate of the primary composite end point of GI events at 12 months after randomization.

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare short-term Triple Antithrombotic Therapy (DAPT + Rivaroxaban) followed by DAPT with standard DAPT in selected ACS patients with high ischemic risk. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Whether the intervention is effective in reducing ischemic events * Whether the intervention is safe from increasing bleeding events, especially severe or fatal ones Participants will be randomized to receive standard DAPT therapy for the entire study duration or low-dose rivaroxaban+DAPT for 3 months, followed by standard DAPT for the rest of the study duration. Patients enrolled should complete 5 follow-ups in the form of clinic visit or telephone call.

This prospective randomized open-label study aims to compare the effectiveness of two dual antihypertensive therapy regimens in patients with arterial hypertension and coronary artery disease after elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with coronary artery stenting. Patients requiring dual antihypertensive therapy will be randomized to receive either an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) combined with a thiazide diuretic or an ARB combined with a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker. The study will evaluate blood pressure control, angina symptoms, quality of life, need for treatment intensification, and healthcare utilization during follow-up. Clinical status will be assessed at discharge and during telemedicine follow-up visits at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks after hospital discharge. The primary endpoint is the percentage reduction in systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Secondary endpoints include frequency of angina episodes, exercise limitations, patient satisfaction with treatment, and medical consultations during follow-up. The study is investigator-initiated and plans to enroll at least 207 participants.

POLARIS is a prospective, single-centre, single-arm observational pilot registry evaluating the real-world safety and efficacy of the Focus np (Abluminus np, Concept Medical, Tampa, FL, USA) polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent in consecutive adult patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The primary endpoint is target lesion failure (TLF) at 12 months, defined per Academic Research Consortium-2 (ARC-2) criteria as the device-oriented composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically indicated target lesion revascularisation. Patients treated since January 2021 will be retrospectively identified and prospectively consented, with follow-up through 5 years. The registry will provide the first Western clinical evidence on this CE-marked device and serve as a template for a future national Swiss multicentre registry.

This study is a randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the effects of combined diaphragmatic and abdominal neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on arterial blood gases, pulmonary function, left ventricular ejection fraction, and functional capacity in patients following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A total of 42 participants will be randomly allocated into two groups: an intervention group receiving NMES along with standard cardiac rehabilitation, and a control group receiving standard rehabilitation alone. The intervention will be administered for 30 minutes per session, five days per week, over a period of two weeks. Outcome measures will include arterial blood gas parameters (PaO₂, PaCO₂, SaO₂), spirometry indices (FVC, FEV₁, PEFR), ejection fraction assessed by echocardiography, and functional capacity measured using the 6-minute walk test. Assessments will be conducted at baseline and post-intervention. The study aims to determine whether NMES can serve as an effective adjunct to conventional cardiac rehabilitation in improving respiratory and functional outcomes in post-PCI patients.

1. Evaluate the efficacy and safety of Qidan Xiaohe granules in patients after coronary revascularization surgery; 2. Develop a traditional Chinese medicine rehabilitation treatment plan and evaluation system for the use of Qidan Xiaohe granules after coronary revascularization surgery; 3. Demonstrate the advantages of traditional Chinese medicine rehabilitation treatment in the postoperative management of coronary revascularization surgery and provide high-level evidence-based medical evidence for the development of traditional Chinese medicine rehabilitation treatment plans.

While the reduced hemorrhagic risk of radial access for percutaneous coronary intervention compared to femoral access is well-established, its main complication remains radial artery occlusion, which can occur in up to 30% of patients. Anticoagulation is the primary preventive measure recommended in clinical practice to reduce the risk of this complication, typically involving heparin injection during the procedure in most centers. However, data on the effect of the timing of heparin injection are limited. The investigators hypothesize that injection of heparin before sheath insertion may reduce the rate of radial artery occlusion compared with injection after sheath insertion.

1. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Baduanjin exercise programme in patients following coronary revascularisation surgery; 2. To develop a traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) rehabilitation protocol and evaluation system for patients following coronary revascularisation surgery; 3. To clarify the advantages of TCM rehabilitation in the post-operative management of coronary revascularisation surgery and to provide high-level evidence-based medical evidence for TCM rehabilitation protocols.

Investigators will evaluate the effectiveness of two different EHR-embedded nudges to improve referral to cardiac rehabilitation.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether coronary CT angiography (CCTA)-guided planning improves the efficiency and outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in adults with coronary artery disease. It will also evaluate the feasibility and safety of using a CT-based "virtual PCI plan" during coronary interventions. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does CCTA-guided PCI reduce procedural time, radiation exposure, and contrast dye use compared with standard PCI? * Does CCTA-guided PCI improve procedural outcomes and stent optimization? * How often do operators follow or deviate from the CT-based procedural plan? * What medical problems or complications occur during and after CCTA-guided PCI? Researchers will compare CCTA-guided PCI with standard angiography-guided PCI to determine whether CT-derived procedural planning improves PCI efficiency and clinical outcomes. Participants will: * Undergo PCI guided either by a CCTA-based virtual planning strategy or by standard clinical practice * Attend follow-up assessments at 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year * Undergo routine clinical evaluations and imaging assessments related to their PCI procedure * Be monitored for procedural complications, symptoms, repeat procedures, and cardiovascular outcomes during follow-up The study will also include a parallel observational registry for patients whose coronary lesions are deferred from PCI, to evaluate their long-term clinical outcomes.

Patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are commonly treated with antiplatelet therapy to prevent stent thrombosis and recurrence of events. After an initial period of dual antiplatelet therapy, long-term treatment with a single P2Y12 inhibitor (such as clopidogrel, ticagrelor, or prasugrel) is often prescribed. However, the optimal drug and dose for long-term monotherapy remain uncertain, as patients may experience either insufficient platelet inhibition (leading to ischemic events) or excessive inhibition (increasing bleeding risk). The HI-TECH 2 study aims to identify the most appropriate type and dose of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy to achieve a balanced level of platelet inhibition within a predefined therapeutic range. The study also seeks to better understand how blood coagulation activity evolves over time after PCI. This is a prospective, investigator-initiated, single-center, open-label study conducted in two phases. In Phase 1, patients receive stepwise reduced doses of ticagrelor or prasugrel to determine the optimal dose that most consistently achieves the desired level of platelet inhibition. In Phase 2, patients are randomly assigned to receive clopidogrel or the optimal doses of ticagrelor or prasugrel identified in Phase 1. The main question of the study is whether optimized ticagrelor or prasugrel regimens are more effective than standard-dose clopidogrel in achieving platelet inhibition within the target therapeutic window, as measured by validated platelet function tests. Additional objectives include evaluating the role of genetic factors in treatment response and assessing markers of coagulation activation over time. The results of this study may help personalize long-term antiplatelet therapy after PCI, improving the balance between reducing thrombotic risk and minimizing bleeding complications.

The OROBICA (Overviewing Real-World Outcomes to Boost Interventional Management of CAlcified Coronary Lesions) Registry is a multicenter, ambispective, real-world observational study designed to evaluate clinical, procedural, imaging, and economic outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for severely calcified coronary artery disease. Coronary artery calcification represents one of the main determinants of procedural complexity and adverse outcomes in contemporary interventional cardiology. Despite the increasing availability of advanced calcium-modification technologies and intracoronary imaging techniques, evidence regarding the optimal treatment strategy in real-world clinical practice remains limited, particularly among high-risk and complex patients often underrepresented in randomized trials. The OROBICA Registry aims to systematically collect longitudinal data from all-comer patients treated for severely calcified coronary lesions using contemporary PCI strategies, including intracoronary imaging guidance (IVUS/OCT), rotational atherectomy, orbital atherectomy, intravascular lithotripsy, specialty balloons, and combined calcium-modification approaches. The primary objective is to assess clinical and procedural outcomes, with particular focus on target vessel failure (TVF). Secondary and exploratory objectives include evaluation of procedural success, imaging findings, predictors of adverse outcomes, healthcare resource utilization, and economic impact associated with the treatment of calcified coronary lesions. The registry is designed as a flexible research platform intended to support future hypothesis-generating analyses and provide real-world evidence to improve personalized management strategies for calcified coronary artery disease.

Sensory innervation of the femoral region which is the entry point for endovascular cardiac interventions such as coronary angiography,cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention is complex.It is thought that the ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves contribute mostly.With transversus abdominis plane block(TAPB),it is planned to provide analgesia by creating a block in these nerve branches that contribute to the sensory innervation of the intervention area.In addition;it was aimed to investigate patient's and physician's satisfaction during the procedure.

Background:Following cardiac catheterization and arterial sheath removal, manual compression is applied until bleeding stops, after which a compression belt is used. Patients must lie supine for at least 6 hours, often experiencing discomfort including back pain, eating difficulties, and urinary problems. The compressed leg is restrained to prevent movement, adding to the discomfort. Despite adhering to this standard procedure, some patients still develop bleeding or hematomas after compression, requiring extended treatment. Current research on predicting compression duration and bleeding risk factors after femoral arterial sheath removal is limited and inconsistent. This study aims to identify factors that can more accurately predict necessary compression time after initial hemostasis, potentially reducing patient discomfort and complications such as prolonged bleeding, extended compression, and hematoma formation, which can impact vital signs. Purpose:To understand the factors influencing complete hemostasis and supine duration after femoral arterial sheath removal in ICU patients. Methods:Clinical data were collected through observation, and statistical analysis was performed using SPSS. Expected Outcomes:To identify factors that influence complete hemostasis and supine duration after femoral arterial sheath removal in ICU patients, and to develop a prediction model that allows clinical units to accurately assess the required supine compression time following femoral arterial sheath removal.

IVUS-FFR Online Accuracy for Coronary Stenosis What is this study testing? This study is testing a new technology called IVUS-FFR , which uses ultrasound imaging inside heart arteries (IVUS) to quickly measure whether a narrowed artery ( coronary stenosis ) is reducing blood flow. Unlike the current standard test (FFR), this new method doesn't require extra wires or medication to work. Why is this important? Many patients with heart artery narrowing need tests to decide if a stent is necessary. Current FFR tests involve inserting a pressure wire and giving medication (like adenosine) that can cause discomfort. IVUS-FFR could provide equally accurate results faster, cheaper, and more comfortably . What happens in the study? If you join: Standard heart artery imaging (angiogram) will be performed. An ultrasound probe (IVUS) will be moved through the artery to create detailed images. The new IVUS-FFR software will analyze these images immediately to estimate blood flow. For comparison, a standard FFR test (with pressure wire and medication) will also be done. All steps use existing approved devices and take \<10 extra minutes. Who can participate? Adults (≥18 years) with: Suspected or known heart artery disease At least one artery narrowing (30%-90% blocked) Excluded: Recent heart attack (\<72 hrs), severe kidney/heart failure, or pregnancy. What are the risks and benefits? Risks: Same as routine heart catheterization (bleeding, infection, artery injury). The IVUS and FFR steps add minimal extra risk. Benefits: No direct benefit, but results may improve future care by reducing need for invasive tests. Study goal: To validate if IVUS-FFR is as accurate as the current FFR standard in 292 patients across multiple hospitals in China. Who is running the study? Led by heart specialists at Fuwai Hospital (Beijing) - China's top cardiovascular center - with ethics committee oversight.

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the benefits and risks of discontinuing antiplatelet therapy on clinical outcomes in patients who previously underwent coronary intervention using a drug-coated balloon. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does stopping antiplatelet therapy after 12 months affect the risk of net adverse clinical events? Does stopping antiplatelet therapy reduce the risk of bleeding compared with continuing treatment? Researchers will compare patients who discontinue antiplatelet therapy with patients who continue antiplatelet therapy to determine the impact on clinical outcomes during follow-up. Participants will: Be randomly assigned to either discontinue or continue antiplatelet therapy Receive routine clinical follow-up through clinic visits or telephone contacts Be monitored for cardiovascular events and bleeding outcomes over time

Background. Randomized data on the optimal parenteral anticoagulant during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in high bleeding risk (HBR) patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are lacking. Methods. BRIGHT-HBR is an investigator-sponsored, open-label, randomized controlled trial comparing bivalirudin vs. unfractionated heparin (UFH) monotherapy in HBR patients with ACS undergoing PCI. A total of 5270 HBR patients with a non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) or recent stabilized ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI, ≥48 hours after symptom onset) will be randomized 1:1 to bivalirudin or UFH at 70 sites in China. HBR is defined by the Academic Research Consortium (ARC)-HBR criteria. The primary composite endpoint is net adverse clinical events (NACE) at 30 days, the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, urgent target-vessel revascularization, or BARC types 2, 3 or 5 bleeding, and the major secondary endpoint is BARC types 2, 3 or 5 bleeding. The study is powered to demonstrate that bivalirudin is superior to UFH monotherapy for NACE in ACS patients with HRB at 30 days after PCI. Conclusions. The BRIGHT-HBR randomized trial aims to provide evidence on whether bivalirudin reduces the incidence of NACE and clinically relevant bleeding compared with UFH monotherapy in patients with ACS who are at HBR undergoing PCI.