Comparison of Stent-Related Symptoms Between Anti-Reflux Stents and Standard DJ Stents in Children With Urolithiasis

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age0-18
SponsorThe Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine

About this trial

The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness and related complications of anti-reflux stents used in pediatric urolithiasis surgery at the Children's Hospital affiliated with Zhejiang University School of Medicine, by comparing them with conventional stents.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

A definitive diagnosis of urinary tract stones by CT scan, with indications for ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URL), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), laparoscopic/open stone extraction with or without robotic assistance, or combined endoscopic lithotripsy, and no contraindications;

Age is less than 18 years old;

For preschool children, the informed consent form is signed by the parents; for school-age children, the informed consent form is signed by both the parents and the child themselves.

Disqualifiers

A history of recurrent bladder irritative symptoms or urinary tract infections;

Severe renal insufficiency, anatomical or functional solitary kidney, and other significant comorbidities that render the child unsuitable for participation in the study;

Stent placement surgery within the past 3 months;

Recent use of medications that may interfere with the study results, such as solifenacin;

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • LaiKai anti-reflux ureteral stent

    Device

    Ureteral stents are serving to support the ureter and facilitate urine drainage with an anti-reflux valve.

  • LaiKai Ureteral Stent

    Device

    Ureteral stents are serving to support the ureter and facilitate urine drainage.

Treatment groups

108 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: LaiKai Anti-Reflux Ureteral Stent (19903)Experimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: LaiKai Ureteral Stent (92001024)Active comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

The effect of stents on body pain

Inquire whether the child has experienced body pain, especially lumbar pain after the insert or removal of the stent. If yes, assign a value of 1; if no, assign a value of 0. The higher the score, the worse the stent is in terms of relieving lumbar pain.

Time frame
Two weeks after stents inserting and two weeks after stents removing

Secondary outcomes

1

The effect of stents on stone-free rate

Calculate the stone clearance rate for children three months and half a year after surgery. The higher the stone clearance rate, the better the stent's effectiveness.

Time frame
Two weeks after stents inserting and two weeks after stents removing
2

The effect of stents on urinary symptoms

Use a self-administered questionnaire to understand the children's daytime urination intervals, times getting up at night, number of urge urinary incontinence episodes, number of genuine urinary incontinence episodes, times of incomplete urination, times of burning sensation during urination, number of hematuria episodes, degree of hematuria, and overall impact of urinary tract symptoms. Scores are assigned from 1 to 3 or 1 to 5 for different questions, with higher scores indicating poorer stent effectiveness in the corresponding dimension.

Time frame
Two weeks after stents inserting and two weeks after stents removing
3

The effect of stents on daily activities and psychological well-being

Based on the questions in the self-administered questionnaire, including "Does the stent affect daily activities?", "Does the stent affect the child's social interactions?", and "Does the stent cause the child to have feelings of inferiority?", we understand the impact of the stent on the child's daily life and psychological well-being. The results are categorized as "No impact", "Slight impact", and "Significant impact", with corresponding scores of "1-3 points". The higher the score, the greater the adverse effect of the stent on the child.

Time frame
Two weeks after stents inserting and two weeks after stents removing
4

The effect of stents on clinical presentation

Understand the impact of the stent on children's urinary tract infections, antibiotic use, and emergency department visits through a questionnaire. The results are scored as "0-1" or "1-5", with higher scores indicating a greater adverse effect of the stent.

Time frame
Two weeks after stents inserting and two weeks after stents removing

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.