Purpose:
This educational trial aims to assess whether plastination models for neuroanatomy training (limbic system, basal ganglia, cerebellum, spinal cord)" improve medical students' understanding of central nervous system anatomy compared to traditional educational methods. It will also evaluate student satisfaction with this teaching tool.
Key Questions:
1. Do plastination models for neuroanatomy training (limbic system, basal ganglia, cerebellum, spinal cord) enhance test scores in neuroanatomy examinations? 2. How do students perceive the educational value of these models?
Study Design:
Researchers will compare two teaching methods:
* Intervention group: Learns using plastination models for neuroanatomy training (limbic system, basal ganglia, cerebellum, spinal cord) * Control group: Learns using standard 2D atlases, power point and plastic models
Participants will:
1. Complete a pre-intervention anatomy knowledge test 2. Attend 4 weekly neuroanatomy sessions using their assigned method 3. Take a post-intervention exam and satisfaction survey 4. Participate in focus groups about their learning experience
Medical students in their third semester of training
Currently enrolled in neuroanatomy coursework at Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
No prior formal training with plastinated models
Willing to attend all study sessions for 7 weeks
Prior experience with plastinated models
Currently taking neuroanatomy remediation courses
Planned absences during >20% of study sessions
Parallel
Plastination Model Group
BehavioralModel Specifications: "S10 silicone plastination models of brainstem structures (1:1 scale) with: • Sectioned at 2mm intervals to reveal internal architecture
Traditional Methods Group
Behavioral1. Netter's Atlas of Human Anatomy (9th ed.) 2. Standardized PowerPoint lectures
Change in neuroanatomy knowledge scores assessed by the "Neuroanatomy Knowledge Assessment Test
Scale Title: Neuroanatomy Knowledge Assessment Test (NKAT). Score Range: 0 (no correct answers) to 15 (all answers correct). Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better neuroanatomy knowledge (better outcome).
Spatial understanding assessment
Method: 3D spatial reasoning test (modified Vandenberg scale) Scoring: 1-5 Likert scale for structure identification accuracy
Student satisfaction assessed by the 10-item Student Satisfaction Survey (SSS)
* Score Range: 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). * Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction (better outcome).
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options:
