Continuous Erector Spinae Block Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia for the Prevention of Chronic Pain Following Thoracotomy: a Retrospective Study

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age18-99
SponsorMeir Medical Center

About this trial

Post-thoracotomy pain syndrome (PTPS) is a prevalent complication that significantly impacts patients' quality of life, with reported incidence ranging from 25% to 90%. This study evaluated the effectiveness of continuous erector spinae plane (ESP) block compared to thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA), the current gold standard, in preventing PTPS. Our goal was to compare the incidence of PTPS between patients who received ESP block and those who underwent TEA. Additional goals included assessing postoperative pain levels, analgesic consumption, and complications related to the anesthesia techniques.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

None

Disqualifiers

None

Trial population

Eligible subjects are adult patients who presented for elective thoracic surgery under general anesthesia and underwent TEA or ESP.

Trial design

Design model

Other

Time perspective

Retrospective

Treatments tested in this trial

  • ESP block

    Procedure/Surgery

    Performance of ESP block for pain relief after thoracic surgery

  • Thoracic epidural

    Procedure/Surgery

    Performance of thoracic epidural for pain relief after thoracic surgery

Treatment groups

34 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: ESP block1 intervention
Group B: Thoracic epidural1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Incidence of post thoracotomy pain syndrome

Incidence of post thoracotomy pain syndrome 3 months post operatively

Time frame
3 months post operatively

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.