Thoracic Surgery

The SAVED LUNG study is a pilot Phase I trial evaluating safety and feasibility of observation versus standard-of-care surgery in operable Stage II-III (excluding N3) NSCLC patients (PD-L1 ≥50%) who achieve complete clinical response following neoadjuvant platinum-doublet chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Participants are randomized to observation or surgery after rigorous restaging, with primary endpoints focusing on safety and feasibility. Secondary objectives include rates of cross-over to surgery, event-free survival, and overall survival, while exploratory endpoints examine ctDNA clearance and its association with clinical response.

In this randomized controlled non-inferiority trial, we will test whether liposomal bupivacaine intercostal nerve block is non-inferior to paravertebral nerve block for the coefficient of variation (CV) of glucose during the 0- to 48-hour postoperative period, using a non-inferiority margin of Δ = 0.025 for the absolute CV difference. We will also compare the two blocks regarding their effects on postoperative glucose, autonomic function, stress, insulin resistance, acute pain, recovery quality, procedure duration, complications, and hemodynamic stability.

This is a prospective, randomized, single-blinded controlled trial designed to compare CT-guided versus conventional methods for selecting double-lumen tube (DLT) size in patients undergoing thoracic surgery requiring one-lung ventilation

Postoperative pain remains a major challenge after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), despite the use of multimodal analgesia. This randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial will evaluate whether adding a 5 mcg/hour transdermal buprenorphine patch to the standard multimodal analgesic regimen reduces postoperative pain in adults undergoing unilateral VATS. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either transdermal buprenorphine or placebo in addition to standard analgesia. Postoperative pain will be assessed at 24, 48, and 72 hours and 7 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes include opioid rescue requirements, length of hospital stay, postoperative nausea and vomiting, pruritus, and urinary retention.

This is a prospective, open-label, parallel-group, 1:1 randomized controlled trial evaluating whether a wireless wearable mobile monitoring device combined with a digital rehabilitation program improves pulmonary function at 90 days postoperatively in patients undergoing curative-intent lobectomy or segmentectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Eligible participants will be randomized to either the intervention group or the control group. Both groups receive standard postoperative rehabilitation education. The intervention group additionally receives a wearable device (chest patch or wristband) for continuous monitoring of SpO₂, heart rate, respiratory rate, and physical activity, along with a smartphone-based digital rehabilitation program including individualized exercise prescriptions (aerobic, resistance, and inspiratory muscle training), daily symptom diaries, and remote feedback with threshold-triggered alerts for up to 90 days after discharge. The control group receives standard rehabilitation education with routine follow-up. The primary endpoint is the between-group difference in FEV1% predicted at postoperative day 90, analyzed using ANCOVA adjusted for baseline FEV1% predicted. Secondary endpoints include FVC% predicted, 6-minute walk distance, daily step count, SpO₂ \<90% time burden, quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30/LC13, mMRC), 90-day readmission and emergency visit rates, and safety outcomes. A total of 126 participants (63 per group) will be enrolled. The study is being conducted at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from June 2026 to October 2027.

This prospective observational study aims to investigate the frequency and clinical significance of biofilm formation on thoracic chest drains used after thoracic surgery. Biofilms are structured bacterial communities that adhere to surfaces and can promote infection and antibiotic resistance. In this study, small samples from the tips of chest drains will be collected under sterile conditions at the time of drain removal and analyzed in the microbiology laboratory. The main objectives are to evaluate the relationship between the duration of chest drain placement and the presence of biofilm, and to identify the antibiotic resistance profiles of microorganisms isolated from these biofilms. Secondary outcomes include the association between biofilm formation, postoperative infections (such as empyema or wound infection), and the length of hospital stay. This study will be conducted at Ondokuz Mayıs University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Thoracic Surgery, in collaboration with the Department of Microbiology. The findings are expected to contribute to better understanding of optimal drain management and infection prevention strategies after thoracic surgery.

Post-thoracotomy pain syndrome (PTPS) is a prevalent complication that significantly impacts patients' quality of life, with reported incidence ranging from 25% to 90%. This study evaluated the effectiveness of continuous erector spinae plane (ESP) block compared to thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA), the current gold standard, in preventing PTPS. Our goal was to compare the incidence of PTPS between patients who received ESP block and those who underwent TEA. Additional goals included assessing postoperative pain levels, analgesic consumption, and complications related to the anesthesia techniques.

Supraventricular arrhythmias complicate more than 40% of cardiac surgeries and are associated with an increased risk of bleeding, stroke, heart failure, and death. Preventing the occurrence of these arrhythmias is a major challenge. This study aims to investigate risk factors and protective factors regarding atrial fibrillation and other iatrogenic cardiac arrhythmias after cardiac surgery, particularly innovative anesthetic strategies such as stellar ganglion blockade which have been recently implemented in our center.

A sedentary behavior in the postoperative phase has a negative impact on recovery from various types of surgery (e.g. abdominal, pulmonary, cardiac or esophageal). In fact, sedentary behavior in the days following surgery is associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications, longer hospital stays and, consequently, higher healthcare costs. Stimulating early mobilization and increasing the level of physical activity after surgery therefore remains a relevant current challenge. The Culture Care program will propose a new experience of the hospital towards an attractive and stimulating intrahospital environment, including art and culture. The hypothesis is that the innovative, positive hospital experience offered by the Culture Care program could contribute to increasing patients' mobility in the postoperative phase and thus reduce the sedentary behaviour compared with a control group included before the implementation of the program. The aim of this study is to explore the effect of the Culture Care program (Control group versus Culture Care group) on the mobility of patients hospitalized after thoracic or abdominal surgery, by determining the level of prediction in relation to the influencing covariates reported in the literature. The first quantitative part of this research project will compare the mobility of patients hospitalized after surgery, before (control group) and after the implementation of the Culture Care program (Culture Care group). Patients will be asked to wear an accelerometer for the first five post-operative days, and to complete three questionnaires (psychological well-being, physical recovery, perception of their mobility). Healthcare workers will be asked to complete a survey on their readiness to stimulate patients' mobility before and after the Culture Care program. The second part will be qualitative including individual semi-structured interviews with patients and healthcare workers during the Culture Care program, to gather their experiences.

This prospective randomized controlled study aims to compare the effects of Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane (SPSIP) block and Rhomboid Intercostal and Subserratus (RISS) block on postoperative pain, respiratory function, and recovery quality in patients undergoing volume-preserving video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Eighty-four patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either SPSIP block or RISS block. The primary outcome is the incidence of somatic pain at the chest drain insertion site at postoperative 2 hours. Secondary outcomes include pain scores, opioid consumption, quality of recovery, diaphragmatic function, pulmonary function, rescue analgesic requirements, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and block-related complications.

Brief Summary (Kısa Özet)The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a cerebral oximetry-guided low fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO\_2) ventilation strategy compared to a standard high FiO\_2 strategy in patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery requiring one-lung ventilation (OLV).Oxygen toxicity and related postoperative pulmonary complications remain significant risks during thoracic anesthesia. While standard protocols often rely on high inspired oxygen concentrations to maintain peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO\_2), this approach may induce hyperoxia. Conversely, lowering FiO\_2 arbitrarily can increase the risk of hypoxemia or compromise tissue oxygenation. This prospective, parallel-group, 1:1 randomized, single-blind clinical trial aims to safely reduce intraoperative oxygen exposure by using regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO\_2) monitoring as a physiological guide.A total of 60 participants aged 18 and older, classified as ASA I-III and scheduled for elective thoracic surgery, will be randomly assigned to one of two arms:Experimental Group (Guided Low FiO\_2 Strategy): Ventilation will be initiated at a low FiO\_2 of 0.5. The FiO\_2 level will not be increased unless peripheral saturation (SpO\_2) falls below 90% or cerebral oxygenation (rSO\_2) drops below 80% of the patient's baseline value.Active Comparator Group (Standard Strategy): Patients will receive conventional anesthesia management, maintaining standard high FiO\_2 levels to keep SpO\_2 above 90% without cerebral oximetry guidance.The primary outcomes to be measured are the incidence of cerebral desaturation during the perioperative period and the incidence of postoperative delirium assessed via the 3D-CAM tool until hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes include intraoperative hemodynamic stability, arterial blood gas parameters (PaO\_2, PaCO\_2, pH, lactate), incidence of hypoxemia, total one-lung ventilation duration, postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD), and lengths of stay in both the intensive care unit (ICU) and the hospital.By utilizing real-time non-invasive cerebral oximetry, the study intends to demonstrate a safe ventilation protocol that minimizes oxygen toxicity without compromising cerebral oxygenation or clinical recovery outcomes.

Postoperative pain remains a common and clinically important burden after thoracic surgery and may progress to chronic postsurgical pain. Conventional pain assessment mainly relies on patient-reported pain intensity and analgesic consumption, which may not fully capture peri-incisional sensory abnormalities, mechanical hyperalgesia, or central sensitization. This prospective observational pilot cohort study aims to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of perioperative quantitative sensory testing (QST) and incision pain mapping in adult patients undergoing elective thoracoscopic or robotic-assisted lung resection. Participants will undergo baseline assessment before surgery, serial postoperative pain assessments during the first 72 hours, QST and mechanical hyperalgesia pain mapping at 48-72 hours after surgery, and follow-up assessments at discharge, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery. The primary feasibility outcomes include recruitment rate, QST completion rates, follow-up completion rates, QST-related discontinuation rate, study-related adverse events, and data completeness. The main clinical mechanistic outcome is the area of peri-incisional mechanical hyperalgesia at 48-72 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include acute postoperative pain intensity, pain burden over 72 hours, opioid consumption, quality of recovery, QST changes, pain-map characteristics, and chronic postsurgical pain at 3 months. This study will not assign or modify therapeutic interventions. All anesthetic, surgical, and analgesic management will be determined by the routine clinical care team. The study is expected to provide feasibility data, preliminary effect estimates, and mechanistic information for future larger perioperative pain studies.

After thoracic surgery, some patients may develop complications such as lung infection, abnormal heart rhythm, fluid around the lung, prolonged air leak, wound infection, emergency department visits, or hospital readmission. These problems may not be found early if monitoring is only done during routine vital sign checks or follow-up visits. This study will evaluate whether data collected by a wearable device can help identify early warning signs of postoperative complications in patients undergoing thoracic surgery. The wearable device will collect information such as heart rate, oxygen level, skin temperature, physical activity, sleep, and wearing status. The study includes two parts. First, the researchers will review previously collected wearable device and medical record data to develop an early warning model. Second, new patients undergoing thoracic surgery will wear the device from hospital admission until about 30 days after discharge. The model will then be tested to see how well it predicts complications that require medical intervention within 30 days after surgery. The main goal is to evaluate how accurately the wearable device-based model can identify patients who develop postoperative complications and how early the model can provide a warning before the complication is clinically confirmed.

This randomized clinical trial aims to compare the effectiveness of Active Cycle of Breathing Techniques combined with Incentive Spirometry (ACBT + IS) versus High-Frequency Chest Wall Oscillation (HFCWO) in patients undergoing thoracic surgery. Postoperative pulmonary complications such as reduced lung function, ineffective cough, and sputum retention are common after thoracic procedures and can delay recovery. A total of 42 participants will be randomly allocated into two groups: one receiving ACBT with Incentive Spirometry and the other receiving HFCWO, along with standard postoperative care. Outcomes including cough effectiveness, sputum clearance, pulmonary function tests, and patient satisfaction will be assessed at baseline, postoperative day 3, and day 5. The study aims to determine the more effective airway clearance technique to improve respiratory outcomes and enhance patient recovery following thoracic surgery.

This is a prospective, randomized, single-center, three-arm, open-label, low-risk medical device clinical study conducted at the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Trakya University Medical Faculty. The study aims to compare the efficacy, safety, and clinical usability of three laryngoscopy methods for double-lumen endotracheal tube (DLT) intubation in patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery requiring one-lung ventilation: (i) C-MAC hyperangulated (D-blade) videolaryngoscopy, (ii) C-MAC Macintosh blade videolaryngoscopy, and (iii) direct Macintosh laryngoscopy. The primary outcome is the total time to successful DLT placement (in seconds), defined as the interval from the end of mask ventilation to fiberoptic bronchoscopic confirmation of correct tube position. Secondary outcomes include glottic visualization quality (POGO score and Cormack-Lehane grade), intubation difficulty (Intubation Difficulty Scale), number of intubation attempts, need for auxiliary maneuvers, intubation-related complications, malposition rate, and postoperative airway symptoms (sore throat, dysphonia) assessed at 1, 6, and 24 hours postoperatively. Eligible patients are adults (≥18 years), ASA class I-III, scheduled for elective thoracic surgery requiring one-lung ventilation. Patients with anticipated difficult airway, emergency surgery, pregnancy, or prior upper airway surgery are excluded. A total of 180 patients will be enrolled and randomized 1:1:1 into three groups (60 per group) using computer-generated block randomization.

This present study aims is to compare the effects of ultrasound-guided paravertebral block, intertransverse process block, and erector spinae plane block on postoperative opioid consumption, and pain scores in patients undergoing VATS.

This clinical trial aims to evaluate the efficacy of virtual reality (VR) as an adjunctive therapeutic method to reduce opioid consumption during the postoperative period of cardiac and thoracic surgeries. Conducted at InCor/HCFMUSP, this single-center, prospective, randomized trial will include 60 patients aged 16 to 40 undergoing procedures such as valve replacements, pulmonary decortication, and video-assisted thoracic surgeries. Patients will be randomized into three groups. The Interactive VR group receives standard anesthesia protocol combined with interactive VR therapy using games and immersive environments. The Passive VR group receives standard protocol combined with passive 360-degree immersive videos. The Control group receives standard anesthesia protocol without VR intervention. The intervention occurs in three daily sessions lasting 30-45 minutes each over the first five postoperative days or until hospital discharge. The primary objective is to measure the reduction in total opioid consumption through medical prescriptions and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump usage. Secondary objectives include pain intensity assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), duration of mechanical and non-invasive ventilation, length of stay in the ICU and hospital, occurrence of paralytic ileus, patient satisfaction, and cognitive status using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Opioids are standard for postoperative pain but are associated with adverse effects like respiratory depression. VR offers an innovative approach by creating immersive environments that serve as cognitive distractions to modulate pain perception and reduce anxiety. The study anticipates that VR will enhance pain control and improve recovery metrics, serving as a safe and scalable complement to traditional postoperative management.

Purpose of the study The goal of this research is to see which of two nerve-numbing techniques-the Rhomboid-Intercostal Block (RIB) or the Thoracic Paravertebral Block (PVB)-works better to control pain after chest surgery (specifically, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, or VATS). Both techniques use numbing medication to block pain signals after the operation. Who can participate? The researchers are looking for adults between 18 and 85 years old who are scheduled for a specific type of chest surgery (a 3-port VATS procedure). How will the research happen? Participants will be put into two equal groups by chance. One group will receive the RIB technique, and the other group will receive the PVB technique. Both procedures are done under ultrasound guidance after the completion of surgery, while the patient is still asleep. The pain levels of the participants will be measured at rest and when taking deep breaths at several times during the first 24 hours after surgery. Why is this study useful? This study aims to find out which pain relief method is more effective and if one results in fewer side effects, such as nausea or the need for stronger pain medications (opioids). These results will possibly help doctors provide better comfort to patients recovering from chest surgery in the future.

The introduction of single-port surgical robot has been a transformative breakthrough in the medical field, representing a significant advancement in minimally invasive procedures. One notable innovation is the SHURUI single-port surgical robot (SP), developed by Beijing Surgerii Robotics Company Limited. The SHURUI SP represents a cutting-edge technology in the field. This system features snake-like surgical instruments utilizing "dual continuum mechanism", which enables precise single-port procedures with wide range of motion and high load capacity. The SHURUI SP has been cleared by the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) of China for use in urology and gynecology and has completed clinical trials for general surgery and thoracic surgery. It is China's first and the world's second approved single-port surgical robot. Compared to multi-port surgical robots, it can provide patients with less trauma, fewer complications, and faster recovery. The SHURUI SP has also achieved significant breakthroughs in clinical applications. It conducted the world's first randomized controlled clinical trial on single-port robotic urologic surgery and introduced a series of innovative surgical paradigms. These include the world's first single-port sleeve lobectomy, single-port retroperitoneal adrenalectomy, single-port retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy, single-port distal gastrectomy (Billroth I anastomosis), and single-port total gastrectomy. Our centre is the first robotic surgical centre in Hong Kong since 2005. Over the years, investigators have established our centre to be one of the leading centre in Hong Kong and the region, with involvement in various new development in thoracic robotic procedures, publications and books, and more recently in robotic endo-lumenal procedures. In this study, investigators evaluate the early surgical outcome and objective functional outcome of patients undergoing robotic thoracic surgery by SHURUI SP.

Video-assisted thoracoscopic lung resection (VATS) is a minimally invasive surgical approach frequently used in the treatment of lung cancers. The most commonly used analgesic technique for this surgery is the paravertebral block with a single peroperative injection of local anesthetic. However, a recent study conducted at our institution revealed that this approach provided less relief than expected in some patients. In light of these results, it becomes crucial to distinguish between technical failures (absence of sensitive anesthesia) and the intrinsic limits of the chosen regional analgesia technique (pain originating from an unanesthetized area or pain despite the presence of sensitive anesthesia) in order to better relieve patients. This study aims to objectively assess the areas of anesthesia obtained through three methods of paravertebral block to evaluate their respective performance and optimize post-VATS analgesic management.

Pulmonary resections are key in treating lung neoplasms, with techniques adapted to tumor size and location. Minimally invasive approaches like VATS have replaced open thoracotomy, but intercostal trocar placement can lead to nerve injury and chronic pain. Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) is usually done via a transthoracic (RATS-TT) approach using intercostal trocars. A newer "out of cage" method (RATS-OTC), using subcostal or subxiphoid ports, avoids intercostal access, potentially reducing nerve damage. A French study showed less opioid use and acute pain with RATS-OTC, but chronic pain outcomes are still unknown. At CHUM, a hybrid RATS technique (RATS-TTH) is also used-intercostal for instruments, but with out-of-cage specimen extraction-to limit intercostal trauma.

This is a large clinical study that compares two different types of anesthesia for patients undergoing a specific kind of minimally invasive lung surgery (thoracoscopic sublobar resection) to remove small, early-stage lung nodules. The study aims to find out if a newer anesthesia method, known as "non-intubated anesthesia" (where patients breathe on their own with the help of a laryngeal mask airway and nerve blocks for pain control), is as safe as the traditional "intubated anesthesia" (which uses a breathing tube and a machine to breathe for the patient). The main goals of the study are, in order: 1. Safety First: To confirm that the non-intubated method does not lead to more lung complications within 30 days after surgery compared to the traditional method. 2. Effectiveness: If it is proven safe, the study will then check if patients receiving the non-intubated anesthesia have a better quality of recovery in the first 24 hours after surgery (e.g., less pain, fewer side effects like a sore throat, and a faster return to normal activities). Approximately 1600 patients from multiple hospitals will be randomly assigned (like flipping a coin) to receive one of the two anesthesia methods. Neither the patients nor the surgeons will be told which group the patient is in when assessing the main outcomes after surgery, to ensure the results are fair and unbiased. The results of this study will provide high-quality evidence to help doctors and patients choose the best and most comfortable anesthesia option for this type of lung surgery.

One-lung ventilation (OLV) is commonly used during thoracic surgery but may negatively affect lung mechanics and gas exchange. Different ventilation strategies are used during OLV, and their effects on respiratory parameters remain an important clinical concern. Flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) is a newer ventilation mode that allows precise control of inspiratory and expiratory flow, potentially improving lung mechanics and gas exchange. Volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) is a widely used conventional ventilation strategy during thoracic anesthesia. The FCVOLVent study is a multicenter, prospective observational study designed to compare the effects of FCV and VCV during one-lung ventilation in adult patients undergoing thoracic surgery. Patients will be ventilated with either FCV or VCV as part of routine clinical practice. The study aims to evaluate respiratory mechanics and oxygenation parameters, including the PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio, airway pressures, lung compliance, and mechanical power during surgery. Data will be collected at predefined time points during one-lung ventilation. The results of this study are expected to provide real-world clinical evidence on the potential advantages and limitations of flow-controlled ventilation compared with volume-controlled ventilation during one-lung ventilation.

The objective of the study is to evaluate, in a clinical trial, the efficacy of peri operative administration of long-acting inhaled ß-2 mimetics on the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications

Title: A Clinical Study Comparing Two Anesthesia Methods for Chest Surgery Why is this study being done? Chest surgeries (like lung surgery) require safe and stable anesthesia. Currently, a drug called propofol combined with an opioid painkiller (alfentanil) is commonly used. However, propofol can sometimes cause low blood pressure and low oxygen levels. A newer drug called remimazolam may cause fewer of these side effects. This study aims to compare the safety and effectiveness of remimazolam (combined with alfentanil) versus propofol (combined with alfentanil) for anesthesia during chest surgery. What will happen in the study? Patients scheduled for elective chest surgery will be invited to participate. If they agree, they will be randomly assigned (like flipping a coin) to one of two groups: * Group 1: Will receive remimazolam and alfentanil for anesthesia. * Group 2: Will receive propofol and alfentanil for anesthesia (standard care). The anesthesiologist will carefully monitor patients during and after surgery. We will mainly compare how often patients in each group experience two safety issues: low oxygen levels in the blood and low blood pressure. We will also record recovery times, drug doses, side effects, and ask patients and surgeons about their satisfaction. Who can participate? Adults aged 18-65 who are scheduled for elective chest surgery and are in relatively stable health (ASA physical status I-III). Where is the study taking place? This study will be conducted in the Department of Anesthesiology at The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical College, Henan, China. Ethics Approval: This study has been reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical College (Approval Number: (2025) Medical Ethics Committee Approval No. 29).