About this trial
This randomized controlled clinical study aims to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of custom-made polyether ether ketone (PEEK) membranes versus polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membranes in guided bone regeneration for maxillary alveolar ridge augmentation in the esthetic zone. Thirty patients requiring ridge augmentation prior to dental implant placement will be enrolled and randomly allocated into two equal groups. Group A will receive customized PEEK membranes, while Group B will be treated with PTFE membranes. Clinical and radiographic assessments, including cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), will be performed immediately postoperatively, at 6 months, and at 12 months to evaluate volumetric, horizontal, and vertical bone gain as well as soft tissue healing and complication rates.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
None
Disqualifiers
None
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Custom-made PEEK Membrane
DeviceCustomized perforated polyether ether ketone (PEEK) membrane designed from preoperative CBCT data and used for guided bone regeneration during maxillary alveolar ridge augmentation.
PTFE Membrane
DevicePolytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membrane used for guided bone regeneration during maxillary alveolar ridge augmentation.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Volumetric Bone Gain
Volumetric bone gain in the augmented maxillary alveolar ridge measured using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and three-dimensional reconstruction software. Volumetric analysis will be performed by comparing immediate postoperative and 6-month postoperative CBCT scans. Volumetric bone gain in the augmented maxillary alveolar ridge measured using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and three-dimensional reconstruction software. Volumetric analysis will be performed by comparing immediate postoperative and 6-month postoperative CBCT scans.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.