DCB Outcomes After Non-Compliant Balloon Vessel Preparation With or Without Scoring in Patients With Femoropopliteal Arterial Disease

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorMarc Sirvent

About this trial

The aim of this clinical trial is to determine whether vessel preparation with a non-compliant scoring balloon before drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty provides superior procedural and clinical outcomes compared with vessel preparation using a non-compliant plain balloon in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) undergoing femoropopliteal endovascular intervention.

The main questions the study aims to answer are:

* Does non-compliant scoring balloon vessel preparation reduce the need for bailout stenting during the index procedure? * Does it improve primary patency after DCB angioplasty? * Does it improve clinically relevant outcomes such as wound healing, freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularisation, limb salvage and health-related quality of life? * Does it provide procedural and economic advantages compared with non-compliant plain balloon vessel preparation?

Participants will be randomly assigned to undergo vessel preparation using either a non-compliant plain balloon or the DKutting™ non-compliant scoring balloon, followed by angioplasty with the Legflow XP™ drug-coated balloon. Patients will undergo clinical, duplex ultrasound and quality-of-life follow-up for 24 months.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

≥18 years of age.

Rutherford class 4-5.

Estimated life expectancy >1 year, per investigator's judgment.

Significant atherosclerotic lesions (≥50% stenosis or chronic total occlusion) in the femoropopliteal segment, including in-stent restenosis.

Disqualifiers

Pregnant or planning pregnancy during the study.

Participation in another drug/device trial.

Inability to cross the target lesion with a guidewire. Successful crossing is defined as advancement of the guidewire tip distal to the target lesion without vessel perforation or flow-limiting dissection.

Inadequate treatment of proximal lesion (>30% residual stenosis).

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Non-compliant Plain Balloon angioplasty (PBA)

    Device

    The intervention consists of preparing the artery with a non-compliant plain balloon before using the DCB (Legflow XP™; Manufacturer: Cardionovum GmbH Bonn, Germany).

  • Non-compliant Scoring Balloon Angioplasty (SB)

    Device

    The intervention consists of preparing the artery with a non-compliant scoring balloon (DKutting™; Manufacturer: DK Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China) before using the DCB (Legflow XP™; Manufacturer: Cardionovum GmbH Bonn, Germany) as definitve treatment.

Treatment groups

142 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Non-compliant plain balloon (PBA)Active comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Scoring balloon (SB)Active comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Bailout stenting

The need for bailout stenting during the index procedure, defined as stent implantation due to residual stenosis \>30% or a flow-limiting dissection (type C according to the Kobayashi classification)

Time frame
At index procedure
2

Primary Patency

Primary patency at 12 months defined as absence of ≥50% restenosis (peak systolic velocity ratio\<2.5) and no clinically driven target lesion revascularisation (CD-TLR), as adjudicated by the duplex core laboratory and the Clinical Events Committee.

Time frame
At 12 months

Secondary outcomes

1

Device success

Device success, defined as successful delivery, inflation, and retrieval of the assigned balloon catheter, resulting in a residual stenosis \<30% without flow-limiting dissection (FLD) on final angiography.

Time frame
During the index procedure
2

Technical success

Technical success, defined as successful use of a device or technique to re-establish vessel patency with a residual stenosis \<30% by visual estimation and \<50% by duplex during the index procedure.

Time frame
During the index procedure.
3

Procedural cost

Procedural cost, defined as the total acquisition cost (€) of all lesion preparation balloons (including adjunctive predilatation balloons, if required) and bailout stents used during the index procedure for the target lesion.

Time frame
During the index procedure
4

Slow-flow phenomenon

Slow-flow phenomenon, defined as an angiographic reduction in antegrade flow occurring after DCB inflation compared with the immediately preceding angiogram, in the absence of residual stenosis \>30%, flow-limiting dissection, or vasospasm. The presence or absence of slow-flow phenomenon will be determined by the independent blinded angiographic review.

Time frame
During the index procedure

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Marc Sirvent

Lead sponsor

Hospital de Granollers

Sponsor institution

DK Medical Technology (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.

Collaborator

Cardionovum GmbH

Collaborator

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: