Effect of a Novel Colonoscopic Lavage Solution on Colonoscopy Quality

ConditionColonoscopy
Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-75
SponsorThe First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University

About this trial

In recent years, with the continuous advancement of digestive endoscopy techniques, how to improve the adenoma detection rate (ADR) by optimizing endoscopic procedural details has become a research hotspot. Colonic spasm can lead to narrowing of the intestinal lumen, deepening of mucosal folds, and limited field of view, thereby affecting lesion exposure and reducing examination quality. Although traditional intravenous antispasmodic drugs (such as scopolamine) can alleviate intestinal spasms, they may cause side effects such as increased heart rate, blood pressure fluctuations, and other systemic adverse reactions. In contrast, menthol is a natural monoterpene compound derived from peppermint oil. It can inhibit L-type calcium channels on the cell membrane of smooth muscle through local application, thereby reducing intracellular calcium concentration and inducing smooth muscle relaxation. This helps to relieve intestinal spasms and patient discomfort during colonoscopy. On the other hand, simethicone, a commonly used defoaming agent, can reduce surface tension, eliminate foam, and improve mucosal visualization. Theoretically, combining antispasmodic menthol with defoaming simethicone may further optimize the visual field during colonoscopy and increase the ADR through a synergistic "antispasmodic + defoaming" mechanism. Therefore, this study plans to conduct a prospective randomized controlled trial to evaluate the antispasmodic effect, safety, and impact on the ADR of a novel irrigation solution (0.1% menthol combined with simethicone suspension) in colonoscopy, providing evidence-based medical support for optimizing endoscopic procedures.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age between 18 and 75 years, regardless of gender;

Scheduled to undergo colonoscopy (for screening, diagnostic, or follow-up purposes);

Adequate bowel preparation quality (Boston Bowel Preparation Scale score ≥ 6);

Voluntarily signed informed consent and able to cooperate with completing study-related assessments.

Disqualifiers

Allergy to menthol, cyclodextrin, or related substances;

History of severe intestinal diseases (such as ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, intestinal perforation, intestinal obstruction, intestinal tumors, etc.);

Presence of severe dysfunction of vital organs such as the heart, liver, kidneys, or lungs, or coagulation disorders;

Pregnant or lactating women;

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Endoscopic irrigation was performed using a novel irrigation solution

    Diagnostic test

    Endoscopic irrigation was performed using a novel irrigation solution (0.1% menthol solution combined with simethicone aqueous suspension).

  • Irrigation was performed endoscopically using normal saline.

    Diagnostic test

    Irrigation was performed endoscopically using normal saline.

Treatment groups

498 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Irrigation solution groupExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: placebo groupPlacebo comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Adenoma detection rate (ADR).

ADR = (number of patients with at least one adenomatous polyp detected / total number of patients in the group) × 100%. Pathological diagnosis was used as the gold standard.

Time frame
Day 0

Secondary outcomes

1

Incidence of intestinal spasm

The percentage of patients with an intestinal spasm score of 2 or 3 out of the total number of patients in the group. Intestinal spasm scoring criteria: Score 1 (Excellent): No spasm; the lumen opening is greater than or equal to two-thirds of the maximum diameter. Score 2 (Moderate): Moderate spasm; the lumen opening is less than two-thirds of the maximum diameter. Score 3 (Poor): Severe spasm; the oral-side lumen cannot be visualized. The maximum diameter is defined as the diameter of the intestinal lumen when fully distended.

Time frame
Day 0
2

Spasm inhibition rate

The percentage of patients whose lumen opening exceeded two-thirds of the maximum diameter within 30 seconds after water injection irrigation, relative to the total number of patients in the group.

Time frame
Day 0
3

Polyp detection rate (PDR)

PDR = (number of patients with at least one polyp detected / total number of patients in the group) × 100%.

Time frame
Day 0

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: