Colonoscopy

There is substantial evidence confirming that identifying and removing colorectal adenomas during colonoscopy helps prevent the development of colorectal cancer. Among the quality indicators for colonoscopy, adenoma detection rate (ADR) is the most important, as it is closely related to the patient's future risk of colorectal cancer. Recent studies have further demonstrated that improving ADR can reduce future mortality from colorectal cancer. Notably, non-polypoid lesions (such as flat or depressed lesions) are more likely to be missed during traditional colonoscopy, making these lesions a leading cause of post-colonoscopy interval colorectal cancer. In a prospective trial conducted by our team comparing the ADR of 3D colonoscopy with standard 2D colonoscopy, we found that 3D colonoscopy significantly improved overall ADR and the detection rate of non-polypoid adenomas. According to current international guidelines, after an index colonoscopy, patients are recommended to undergo surveillance colonoscopy 1 to 10 years later, depending on their findings at index colonoscopy. Since these patients represent the majority in clinical practice, increasing the ADR during surveillance colonoscopy not only allows for more precise recommendations for the timing of the next colonoscopy but also effectively reduces the risk of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC). Therefore, this multicenter, prospective, randomized trial aims to compare the clinical performance of 3D colonoscopy and standard 2D colonoscopy in the context of surveillance colonoscopy.

Background: Adenoma detection rate is one of the most quality indicator: an accumulating body of evidence has shown that detection and resection of pre-cancerous adenoma by colonoscopy could effectively prevent colorectal cancer (CRC) and its related mortality1,2. Among various colonoscopy quality indicators, such as cecal intubation rate, withdrawal time, and adenoma detection rate (ADR), ADR is the most important one and most closely associated with the subsequent risk of CRC3,4. A recent study further demonstrated the improvement of ADR could reduce subsequent risk of CRC5. Equipment and technique to improve ADR: To be noted, among all colorectal neoplasm, non-polypoid lesions, such as flat or depressed lesions, carries higher likelihood to be overlooked during conventional colonoscopy and these overlooked lesions were the main etiology of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC)6. Nowadays, several colonoscopy technologies had been developed to enhance the detection of colorectal adenoma such as using digital or dye-spray chromoendoscopy7 or add-on device such as Cap/Endocuff/third eye/FUSE-assisted endoscopy8. Among them, some had showed the potential to enhance the detection of non-polypoid lesion, for example, the next-generation NBI9 or iSCAN10. Application of 3D endoscopy on GI disease: 3D endoscopy is a new technology that using image processing technique to offer more information on tissue depth in comparison with conventional 2D endoscopy. The utility of 3D endoscopy on GI tract was mainly from upper GI tract and it was proved to enhance the diagnostic accuracy on superficial gastric tumors11 and shortened the procedure time during performing gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)12. However, few is known that whether 3D colonoscopy could enhance the ADR, especially for non-polypoid lesion detection, during colonoscopy examination. Positive fecal immunochemical test(FIT) group Among subjects who receive colonoscopy examination, higher advanced adenoma or invasive caners were found in FIT positive group. However, still about half of positive FIT subjects who received colonoscopy exam, have negative colonoscopy result. Non polypoid lesions could be overlooked during the colonoscopy. Therefore, we tried to use this prospective, multicenter, randomized control study to demonstrate the efficacy of 3D colonoscopy on adenoma detection in comparison with conventional 2D colonoscopy in this kind of high risk group.

The occurrence of interval cancers after colonoscopy raises the possibility of missed lesions. High- performance computer aided diagnosis (CAD) systems have been specially designed for the detection of colorectal lesions (CAD for detection is named CADe). The use of CADe improves adenoma detection in screening colonoscopy. The potential of CADe system in reducing the rate of progression to advanced polyps or interval cancer between two colonoscopies remains still uncertain.

Colonoscopy is a test that lets doctors look inside the large bowel to find and remove growths called polyps, which can develop into bowel cancer. Before the test, people take a bowel preparation to empty the bowel. Even so, the right side of the bowel is often not clean enough, and polyps there can be missed. This study is testing whether giving an enema (a small amount of fluid passed into the bowel) during the colonoscopy makes the right side of the bowel cleaner. Participants having a routine colonoscopy at Westmead Hospital or Auburn Hospital will be assigned by chance to either receive the enema during the procedure or to have their colonoscopy in the usual way. Neither group takes any extra preparation at home. The researchers will compare how clean the right side of the bowel is in each group, using a standard scoring system, and will also look at how many polyps are found. The aim is to find out whether this simple step improves the quality of colonoscopy.

The purpose of this study is to gain early experience in the Triton 1.5 System in performing diagnostic, screening, surveillance, and basic therapeutic tasks (e.g., polypectomy for lesions ≤ 2 cm). This study will be the first clinical experience with Triton 1.5 in the Middle East, conducted at Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi.

This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a multimodal artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted smartphone application in improving bowel preparation outcomes among hospitalized adults undergoing colonoscopy. A total of 140 participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either an experimental group or a control group. The control group will receive conventional written and verbal nursing education, while the experimental group will receive the same standard education plus a multimodal AI-assisted application delivered through the LINE platform. The application provides structured bowel preparation education, interactive AI-based question-and-answer support, dietary image recognition, stool image analysis, and individualized feedback. Study outcomes will include bowel preparation knowledge, satisfaction with nursing education, and bowel cleansing quality assessed using the Aronchick Scale.

The goal of this trial is to evaluate whether water exchange colonoscopy and CO2-insufflation colonoscopy with an abdominal compression device (Maxbelt me3 type, Nippon Sigmax Co., Tokyo, Japan) can achieve a significantly lower proportion of patients requiring manual abdominal pressure during colonoscopic insertion compared with CO2 insufflation alone.

Computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) for colonoscopy aims to enhance optical diagnosis but often underperforms when used alongside humans due to under-reliance on AI. Psychological interventions like cognitive forcing, such as delaying CADx suggestions, may improve human-AI interaction by fostering critical assessment. However, their impact on patient-important outcomes remains unexplored. The investigators will conduct an ex-vivo randomized study with 70 endoscopists assessing 100 polyp videos (≤5 mm) using a CADx tool (GI Genius, Medtronic). Participants will be randomized to either: * Intervention group: CADx suggestions will be shown in the last 3 seconds of the 15 second polyp video. * Control group: CADx suggestions will be shown in real-time throughout the playback of the 15 second polyp video. The primary endpoint is sensitivity for high-confidence neoplasia detection, with secondary endpoints assessing endoscopists' reliance on AI. CADx systems on the market function in various ways, such as real-time, delayed, or on-demand diagnosis. Our study aims to inform users and manufacturers whether cognitive forcing through delayed CADx suggestions enhances human-AI interaction, leading to improved clinical outcomes.

In this study, the investigators will test the ability of the Magnetic Flexible Endoscope (MFE) to travel through the colon of people with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). The MFE is a device made of ultra-flexible tubing that contains a camera, light, and magnet at the tip. The tip of the tube is about the size of a penny. The magnet inside the tip allows the MFE to be moved through the colon by a second magnet attached to a robotic arm that is outside the body. The purpose of this study is to see how the MFE travels through the colon of IBD patients and if it is tolerable.

The purpose of this study is to assess the provider experience with a novel colonoscopy irrigation solution and determine the feasibility of introducing this solution into the endoscopy unit and assess efficacy on a small scale prior to a larger study. Specifically, the study will assess mucosal visibility, colonic spasm, and intralumenal bubbles observed during colonoscopy.

This study is a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial designed to determine the effect of box breathing exercises on anxiety, pain, and pulmonary function in patients undergoing colonoscopy. Data will be collected using the Participant Characteristics Form, State Anxiety Inventory (SAI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and Pulmonary Function Test Monitoring Form. Patients scheduled for colonoscopy who meet the inclusion criteria will be informed about the study, and written informed consent will be obtained. Upon arrival at the endoscopy unit, all participants will complete the Participant Characteristics Form and the State Anxiety Inventory (SAI) under the supervision of researcher MA. Baseline pulmonary function tests will be performed using the Contec SP-10 Spirometer (China). After confirming eligibility and obtaining written informed consent, researcher GB will notify researcher YG, who will determine the participant's group allocation and communicate it to GB according to the randomization sequence. Before the procedure, 34 patients allocated to the intervention group will receive the box breathing intervention, whereas 34 patients in the control group will receive routine pre-procedural care. Patients in the intervention group will receive instruction from researcher GB on the box breathing technique (4-4-4-4 breathing) upon arrival at the endoscopy unit. The exercise consists of inhaling through the nose for 4 seconds, holding the breath for 4 seconds, exhaling slowly through the mouth for 4 seconds, and holding the breath again for 4 seconds, constituting one complete cycle. Participants will be instructed to continue practicing this breathing exercise until they are transferred to the procedure room. Participants in the control group will receive the unit's standard pre-procedural care. As part of routine practice, vital signs are assessed before the procedure. To maintain patient privacy, participants remove their clothing and wear a surgical gown. After being positioned in the left lateral position, petroleum jelly is applied to the anal region, and the colonoscopy is performed using a flexible colonoscope. All colonoscopy procedures will be performed by the same gastroenterology specialist to ensure procedural consistency. Immediately after the procedure, the State Anxiety Inventory (SAI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and Pulmonary Function Test Monitoring Form will be administered by researcher MA.

The goal of this study is to evaluate whether a "thirst kit" (lemon popsicle) is effective in reducing thirst intensity in patients undergoing hospital bowel preparation for colonoscopy. The study also aims to assess the impact of the thirst kit on associated symptoms and patient satisfaction. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does the thirst kit reduce the intensity of thirst after bowel preparation for colonoscopy? * Does the thirst kit reduce symptoms such as dry mouth and dry throat? * How satisfied are patients when using the thirst kit compared to a placebo? Researchers will compare the thirst kit to a placebo to determine its effectiveness in managing thirst during the pre-colonoscopy period. Participants will: * Be randomly assigned to receive either the thirst kit (lemon popsicle) or a placebo * Use the assigned intervention during the hospital preparation period for colonoscopy * Rate thirst intensity, associated symptoms, and satisfaction using numerical scales

High cancellation rates and suboptimal bowel preparation increase patient discomfort, drive economic waste, and compromise clinical outcomes. Despite guideline emphasis on adequate preparation quality, there is no standard on how or when instructions should be delivered. This study compares three common patient education modalities-usual care verbal counseling, written tri-lingual pamphlet, and visual media via smartphone QR code-to determine which yields the best bowel preparation quality as assessed by the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) in an outpatient endoscopy setting.

Colonoscopy is a commonly used minimally invasive method for evaluating the lower gastrointestinal tract. The quality of colonoscopy is assessed by factors such as cecal intubation rate and adenoma detection rate, both of which are affected by bowel preparation. Adequate bowel cleansing is critical for an ideal colonoscopy. Inadequate bowel preparation can prolong the procedure time, miss pathological findings, and increase hospital costs due to repeated procedures. Studies have shown that nearly 25% of patients have inadequate bowel preparation. Several factors influence bowel cleansing, including diet, bowel preparation medication, and a history of gastrointestinal surgery. In a study, male gender, hospitalization, and spring season were reported as independent risk factors for inadequate bowel preparation. A retrospective US study associated age ≥66 with poor colonoscopy preparation, while two Asian studies associated age ≥60. Comorbidities such as diabetes, stroke, and dementia, as well as low socioeconomic status, have also been reported to negatively impact adequate bowel cleansing. The Aronchick scale, Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale (OBPS), and Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) are commonly used in bowel preparation scoring. The BBPS is rated from 0 to 9, with 9 considered excellent bowel preparation. It is applied after cleansing and aspiration of colon segments, which are divided into right, transverse, and left colon. Among the current scoring systems, the BBPS is the most useful and reliable scale. The positive effects of alkaline pH water on the gastrointestinal system are well known. Alkaline mineral water has positive effects on intestinal epithelial regeneration, inflammatory response, improved barrier function, and antioxidant mechanisms. In this study, researchers aimed to investigate the effect of the pH value of water consumed during bowel preparation before colonoscopy on bowel cleansing. Demographic, clinical, and intraoperative data of patients undergoing colonoscopy in investigators hospital's surgical endoscopy unit between July 2026 - July 2027 will be examined. Patients meeting the inclusion criteria will be included in the study. For pre-procedure information, all patients will be given a bowel preparation form by the surgical endoscopy unit, and patients who do not fully adhere to the diet will be excluded from the study. Informed consent will be obtained from the patients or their legal representatives. All procedures will be performed under sedation with the assistance of an anesthesiologist. Bowel cleansing will be assessed according to the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBHS). The pH value and content of the drinking water will be noted when the bowel preparation form is given; no specific instructions will be given regarding this. However, patients will be asked to use the same water throughout the bowel preparation period. Data regarding drinking water will be confirmed on the day of the procedure for a second check. This study will be the first of its kind in this field.

The primary objective is to determine if the use of the colonoscopy surveillance recommendations algorithm increases the accuracy of surveillance timing recommendations compared to traditional methods. The secondary objective is to assess the time required to make surveillance recommendations with and without the algorithm, determine the efficiency gains (the average time saved per recommendation), and evaluate the opportunity cost (the financial value of the time saved).

This study will compare two different sedation approaches used during gastroscopy, colonoscopy, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). One group will receive dexmedetomidine alone (opioid-free sedation), while the other group will receive dexmedetomidine combined with remifentanil (opioid-based sedation). The purpose of the study is to determine whether an opioid-free sedation approach can reduce opioid-related adverse symptoms, such as nausea, vomiting, dizziness, drowsiness, dry mouth, headache, and fatigue. The study will also evaluate quality of recovery, patient and healthcare staff satisfaction, hemodynamic effects, complications, and time to discharge after the procedure.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks third in both incidence and mortality among all malignant tumors in China. Studies have shown that early screening can significantly reduce its incidence and mortality. Colonoscopy is the gold standard for CRC screening; however, compliance with colonoscopy among high-risk groups in China is very low. Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted tools can provide real-time, personalized health education, and nudge strategies can help translate intent into action. This trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of AI-empowered nudge for improving colonoscopy uptake among high-risk individuals aged 45 to 74 in China. It's a two-arm, pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial. The main question it aims to answer is whether the AI-enabled personalized health education and nudge strategies improve colonoscopy adherence. Participants will: 1. Be recruited and allocated into one of two groups according to the assigned clusters. Participants in one group will be invited to receive usual care. In addition to usual care, participants in the other group will receive AI-empowered nudge, featuring an AI chatbot providing real-time personalized responses and a nudge environment with default screening option. 2. Have their colonoscopy status checked at the end of trial.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide. These malignancies originate in the colon or rectum, and the majority evolve from pre-existing colonic adenomas (a type of colon polyp). Early detection, identification, and removal of these precancerous lesions can effectively reduce the morbidity and mortality of colorectal cancer. However, not all colonic polyps possess a significant risk of malignant transformation. Polyps can generally be subdivided into "neoplastic" and "non-neoplastic" lesions; major non-neoplastic polyps include inflammatory polyps, hamartomas, lymphoid polyps, mucosal prolapse polyps, and hyperplastic polyps. On the other hand, neoplastic polyps have the potential to develop into malignancies, primarily including adenomatous polyps and serrated polyps. Adenomatous polyps account for more than 50% of all colonic polyps and are the most common precancerous lesions for CRC. Clinically, they can be further classified into tubular, tubulovillous, or villous adenomas based on histological subtypes. As for serrated polyps, traditional serrated adenomas (TSAs) and sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) possess carcinogenic potential. During a colonoscopy, detecting colonic polyps is crucial, but it is equally important to identify which polyps have malignant potential. This allows for the accurate resection of true precancerous lesions while avoiding the procedural risks associated with unnecessary polypectomies. Furthermore, in rare instances, diminutive polyps may harbor cancer with deep submucosal invasion. Due to the risks of incomplete resection and lymph node metastasis, such lesions are not suitable for endoscopic resection. Therefore, achieving an accurate endoscopic diagnosis is a key step in determining the most appropriate management strategy for colonic polyps. To improve the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopy for colonic polyps, multiple modalities have been developed, including careful observation of lesion morphology, as well as various image-enhanced technologies and chromoendoscopy. Meanwhile, three-dimensional (3D) endoscopy, a novel technology, offers superior spatial resolution and depth perception compared to conventional two-dimensional (2D) endoscopy. Studies have confirmed that 3D endoscopy can improve the adenoma detection rate (ADR) due to its enhanced ability to detect flat and inconspicuous lesions. However, whether 3D colonoscopy can also enhance the endoscopic diagnostic accuracy for colonic polyps remains to be explored. Therefore, we designed a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to investigate whether 3D colonoscopy can improve the diagnostic accuracy of colonic polyps compared to conventional 2D colonoscopy.

This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effects of different ratios of electrolyte beverage and water combined with polyethylene glycol (PEG) on bowel preparation quality before colonoscopy. Participants undergoing elective colonoscopy will be randomly assigned to one of three bowel preparation regimens: PEG prepared with water only, PEG prepared with a low ratio of electrolyte beverage and water, or PEG prepared with a medium ratio of electrolyte beverage and water. The primary outcome is adequate bowel preparation assessed by the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). Secondary outcomes include bowel preparation completion rate, tolerability, adverse events, repeat colonoscopy rate, adenoma detection rate, and ingestion rhythm characteristics during bowel preparation. This study also aims to explore whether electrolyte beverage-assisted bowel preparation may improve bowel cleansing quality by influencing participants' ingestion rhythm and adherence during PEG intake.

The primary objectives of this project are twofold: firstly, to evaluate the role of Maifu Changqing® Complete Nutrition Formula Powder in bowel preparation for colonoscopy in patients with IBD; and secondly, to enhance the nutritional support and comfort of bowel preparation for IBD patients.

The primary objectives of this project are twofold. On the one hand, it aims to investigate the current status of bowel preparation protocols and their quality in IBD patients undergoing colonoscopy, particularly focusing on the implementation of these protocols across hospitals following the release of the 2023 bowel preparation guidelines. This will further standardize and optimize bowel preparation practices in China. On the other hand, the project seeks to identify and examine various risk factors contributing to poor bowel preparation quality in IBD patients, analyze their correlation with bowel preparation scores, and develop a risk prediction model for failed bowel preparation. This will provide a theoretical foundation for formulating personalized bowel preparation regimens tailored to individual patient conditions in the future.

In recent years, with the continuous advancement of digestive endoscopy techniques, how to improve the adenoma detection rate (ADR) by optimizing endoscopic procedural details has become a research hotspot. Colonic spasm can lead to narrowing of the intestinal lumen, deepening of mucosal folds, and limited field of view, thereby affecting lesion exposure and reducing examination quality. Although traditional intravenous antispasmodic drugs (such as scopolamine) can alleviate intestinal spasms, they may cause side effects such as increased heart rate, blood pressure fluctuations, and other systemic adverse reactions. In contrast, menthol is a natural monoterpene compound derived from peppermint oil. It can inhibit L-type calcium channels on the cell membrane of smooth muscle through local application, thereby reducing intracellular calcium concentration and inducing smooth muscle relaxation. This helps to relieve intestinal spasms and patient discomfort during colonoscopy. On the other hand, simethicone, a commonly used defoaming agent, can reduce surface tension, eliminate foam, and improve mucosal visualization. Theoretically, combining antispasmodic menthol with defoaming simethicone may further optimize the visual field during colonoscopy and increase the ADR through a synergistic "antispasmodic + defoaming" mechanism. Therefore, this study plans to conduct a prospective randomized controlled trial to evaluate the antispasmodic effect, safety, and impact on the ADR of a novel irrigation solution (0.1% menthol combined with simethicone suspension) in colonoscopy, providing evidence-based medical support for optimizing endoscopic procedures.

In recent years, with increasing research into antispasmodic agents, topical antispasmodics have attracted considerable attention due to their direct action on the gastrointestinal mucosa and relatively low incidence of adverse reactions. Menthol, a natural terpenoid compound found in peppermint oil, has been confirmed by numerous studies to possess spasmolytic properties. Existing evidence indicates that menthol relaxes intestinal smooth muscle and alleviates spasm symptoms by antagonizing L-type calcium channels on the smooth muscle cell membrane, thereby reducing calcium influx. Furthermore, it exhibits local analgesic effects and can attenuate visceral hypersensitivity. Some studies suggest that oral or topical administration of peppermint oil preparations may improve intestinal spasm during colonoscopy, highlighting its potential utility in digestive endoscopy procedures. Nevertheless, current research on the spasmolytic efficacy and safety of menthol solution when administered via endoscopic irrigation during colonoscopy remains limited, and high-quality clinical trials are urgently needed for validation. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness and safety of menthol solution in relieving intestinal spasm, thereby providing scientific evidence for optimizing colonoscopy procedures.

Adequate bowel preparation is critical for successful colonoscopy, yet inadequate preparation remains a significant clinical challenge, occurring in 20-30% of procedures. In hospitalized patients undergoing therapeutic colonoscopy, suboptimal preparation leads to increased costs, prolonged hospital stay, and potential procedure cancellation or rescheduling. Current standard care involves resident ward rounds twice daily. This cluster-randomized crossover trial aims to evaluate whether increasing the frequency of structured resident ward rounds from 2 to 4 times per day can improve bowel preparation quality in hospitalized patients scheduled for therapeutic colonoscopy. The enhanced ward round intervention includes standardized checklist review, medication verification, dietary compliance confirmation, adverse event screening, and timely intervention when needed. Three hospital wards will be randomly assigned to different sequences of intervention and control periods using a crossover design with washout periods. The primary outcome is adequate bowel preparation quality assessed by Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS ≥6 with each segment ≥2), evaluated by blinded endoscopists. Secondary outcomes include procedure quality metrics (cecal intubation rate, examination duration), safety endpoints (electrolyte disturbances, aspiration events), health economics measures (length of stay, total costs), and healthcare worker burden (nursing workload, night-time call frequency). Subgroup analyses will examine intervention effects across age groups, cognitive function levels, prior colonoscopy experience, and comorbidity burden to identify populations most likely to benefit from enhanced monitoring. This pragmatic trial addresses a clinically relevant question using a real-world implementation strategy designed to minimize workflow disruption. Results will inform evidence-based policies regarding optimal ward round frequency for colonoscopy preparation in hospital settings.

This prospective observational study investigates how participants experience screening colonoscopy within the Danish colorectal cancer screening program and how these experiences relate to clinical findings, procedural factors, and future participation in screening. The study aims to evaluate patient-reported experiences such as pain, discomfort, preparation burden, emotional responses, and perceptions of healthcare staff, as well as staff-assessed pain during the procedure. These experiences will be examined in relation to colonoscopy findings, including polyp detection, histology, risk stratification, and colorectal cancer detection. In addition, procedure-specific variables such as insertion time, bowel preparation quality, completeness of colonoscopy, medication use, and adenoma detection rate will be analyzed in relation to patient experience. A key focus is whether the experience of screening colonoscopy influences subsequent participation in the colorectal cancer screening program, particularly among individuals classified as low risk and re-invited for screening after two years. Registry-based follow-up will be used to assess re-participation. Data are collected prospectively from two sources: (1) real-time procedure data entered by healthcare staff during colonoscopy and (2) patient-reported outcomes collected via a questionnaire completed shortly after the procedure. Additional outcome data are obtained from electronic medical records and national health and screening registries. The study has no single predefined hypothesis. Instead, it serves as a data-generating platform designed to address both predefined and future research questions related to screening colonoscopy experiences, quality indicators, and screening adherence.