About this trial
The objective of this study will be to compare between Immediate Implant grafted with xenograft and Alb-PRF gel versus xenograft with L-PRF.
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
* The presence of non-restorable mandibular molar.
Patient 18-45 years old
Intact buccal and lingual walls
Good oral hygiene.
Disqualifiers
Proximity of anatomical structures
Acute localized infection (suppuration at the surgical field)
Patients on chemotherapy or radiotherapy.
Patients who have systemic disorders (diseases) {diabetes mellitus, autoimmune disease, …etc},
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Immediate Implant Placement and Alb-PRF
Procedure/SurgeryImmediate Implant Placement in lower molar region, Grafted with Xenograft and Albumin PRF Gel
Immediate Implant Placement and L-PRF
Procedure/SurgeryImmediate Implant Placement in lower molar region, Grafted with Xenograft and L-PRF
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Vertical peri-implant bone level
the distance between implant platform to the most coronal bone-implant contact
Keratinized tissue Width
Width of Keratinized tissue before and after surgery
Crestal bone level
distance between implant platform and bone crest
Secondary outcomes
Implant Stability
by Smart peg
Bucco-lingual bone width
it's measured with a line coinciding with implant platform
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.