Effect of Reactive Balance Training Versus Conventional Balance Training on Dynamic Stability and Change-of-Direction Performance in Competitive Tennis Players

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-25
SponsorIbadat International University, Islamabad

About this trial

This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effectiveness of reactive balance training versus conventional balance training on dynamic stability and change of direction performance. Participants will be randomly allocated into two groups. Each group will receive its respective intervention over a 6-week period. Outcome measures, including dynamic stability assessed by the Y-Balance Test and change-of-direction performance measured using the 505 Agility Test, will be evaluated at baseline and after the intervention. The study is designed to determine which training approach is more effective in improving balance and functional performance.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Male and female competitive tennis players aged 18-25 years.

Minimum 2 years of regular tennis training experience.

Currently training at least 3 sessions per week (minimum 60 minutes per session).

Disqualifiers

Recent injury (last 3 months)

Neurological, balance or vestibular disorders

Previous surgery

Participation in any structured balance, neuromuscular, plyometric, or agility training program outside regular tennis practice during the study period.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Experimental group : Reactive Balance Training

    Other intervention

    Participants will receive a structured reactive balance training program based on unpredictable perturbation-based exercises requiring rapid postural correction. The intervention will be conducted for 6 weeks (3 sessions/week) and will follow a progressive protocol.

  • Active comparator ( Conventional Balance Training)

    Other intervention

    Participants will receive a structured conventional balance training program based on static and controlled exercises without external perturbation, conducted for 6 weeks (3 sessions/week).

Treatment groups

64 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Reactive balance trainingExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Conventional Balance TrainingActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Dynamic Stability

Dynamic stability will be assessed using the Y-Balance Test (Lower Quarter), which measures reach distance in anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral directions. The composite score (normalized to limb length) will be used to evaluate postural control and balance performance.

Time frame
Baseline (Pre-intervention) and after 6 weeks (Post-intervention)
2

Change of Direction Performance

Change-of-direction ability will be assessed using the 505 Agility Test, which measures the time (in seconds) required to accelerate, change direction (180° turn), and return over a set distance. Lower time indicates better performance.

Time frame
Baseline (Pre-intervention) and after 6 weeks (Post-intervention)

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.