Effect of Visual Deprivation of the Team Leader on Team Performance During Simulated Medical Emergencies

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age25-65
SponsorRennes University Hospital

About this trial

This multicenter randomized controlled study aims to evaluate the impact of temporary visual deprivation of the medical team leader on non-technical skills and team performance during high-fidelity simulated medical emergencies. The intervention is based on principles of crisis resource management and cognitive load theory. Team performance will be assessed using validated scoring tools immediately after the intervention and at three months follow-up.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

A senior doctor identified as the "medical leader"

An anaesthesia and intensive care intern

A state-registered nurse anaesthetist

Participants with at least two years' experience in the specialty.

Disqualifiers

The study cannot be carried out during a safety rest period (i.e. the day after being on call).

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Visual deprivation

    Behavioral

    The designated team leader performs the simulated scenario while wearing visual deprivation mask

Treatment groups

54 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Visual deprivationExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: No visual deprivationNo intervention 0 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Evolution of team performance on non-technicals skills

Team performance on non-technicals skills measured using the validated Team emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) score assessed by blinded independent evaluators based on video recordings. TEAM score goes from 0 to 54 : 0 being the lowest level of non-technical competence (worst outcome) and 54 being the highest (better outcome)

Time frame
Before intervention (scenario 1) at day 1, immediately after (scenario 3) at day 1 and after the procedure (scenario 4) at 3 month

Secondary outcomes

1

Evolution of team's clinical performance

Rating with objective markers of quality of care. Five objective and measurable criteria for each scenario are defined by a panel of three experts in anaesthesia and intensive care using the DELPHI method.

Time frame
Before intervention (scenario 1) at day 1, immediately after (scenario 3) at day 1 and after the procedure (scenario 4) at 3 month
2

Evolution of medical leadership skills

the change in the score for items 1 and 2 of the TEAM grid obtained by the medical leader of each team

Time frame
Before intervention (scenario 1) at day 1, immediately after (scenario 3) at day 1 and after the procedure (scenario 4) at 3 month
3

Clinical transferability of soft skills training in clinical practice

self-assessment questionnaire on perceived transfer to clinical practice and an open-ended narrative question completed individually by study participants.

Time frame
Immediately after the intervention at day 1 and at 3 month
4

Evolution of theoretical knowledge of soft skills

scores obtained by participants in the pre- and post-training questionnaires developed for this training course in accordance with the HAS (High Health Authority) recommendations for good practice in health simulation

Time frame
At the end of the intervention at day 1 and at 3 month

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.