Effects of Diaphragmatic Breathing Retraining in Combat Sport Athletes With Dysfunctional Breathing Patterns

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-50
SponsorNational Cheng Kung University

About this trial

Combat sport athletes often need to maintain a guarded posture, stabilize the trunk, react quickly, and control balance during contact or unexpected movement. These demands may be related not only to strength and conditioning, but also to the coordination between breathing and postural control. The diaphragm is the main muscle for breathing and also contributes to trunk stability through its role in pressure regulation and deep core control. However, dysfunctional breathing patterns, such as upper-chest dominant breathing, reduced lower rib expansion, or poor coordination between the chest and abdomen, may interfere with this function.

The purpose of this study is to examine dysfunctional breathing patterns in combat sport athletes and to investigate whether diaphragmatic breathing retraining can improve breathing patterns, diaphragm function, core stability, postural control, and sport-related performance. This study will first screen athletes from combat and non-combat sports to determine the prevalence of dysfunctional breathing. Combat sport athletes will then complete laboratory tests to examine the relationship between breathing pattern, posture, diaphragm function, core stability, and postural control. In the intervention part of the study, combat sport athletes with dysfunctional breathing will be randomly assigned to diaphragmatic breathing retraining plus usual training or usual training only. The study will compare the two groups to determine whether adding diaphragmatic breathing retraining provides additional benefits. The study will also examine whether the changes are maintained after training and whether baseline measures can help identify athletes who respond better to the program.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Aged between 18 and 50 years.

Currently participating regularly in combat sports, such as taekwondo, boxing, judo, karate, jiu-jitsu, or similar sports, with at least 2 years of training experience.

Training at least 3 times per week.

Disqualifiers

Current or major musculoskeletal injury within the past year that may affect testing or training performance.

History of major thoracic, abdominal, or spinal surgery.

Known cardiopulmonary diseases, such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or heart disease; neurological disorders; vestibular dysfunction; or other conditions that may affect balance.

Current or recent pregnancy.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Diaphragmatic breathing training exercise

    Other intervention

    Participants will complete one session of diaphragmatic breathing correction. During the session, verbal instruction, manual facilitation, and corrective feedback will be used to guide participants toward a more diaphragmatic breathing pattern. Participants will be instructed to breathe with relaxed shoulders and neck, increase lower rib cage and abdominal expansion, and minimize upper-chest dominant breathing. The intervention is designed to examine the immediate effects of breathing correction on breathing pattern characteristics, diaphragm function, postural alignment, and core stability-related outcomes.

  • Usual training

    Other intervention

    Participants continue their regular sport-specific training schedule. They receive non-specific limb stretching and general exercise education but no structured breathing exercises or breathing instruction during the study period.

Treatment groups

60 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Diaphragmatic Breathing Retraining GroupExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Usual Training Control GroupOther 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Breathing Pattern_ Total Faulty Breathing Scale (TFBS) Score

Breathing pattern severity assessed using the Total Faulty Breathing Scale (TFBS), a structured observational tool scored 0-12. Higher scores indicate greater breathing dysfunction. Assessed during 10 cycles of quiet and 10 cycles of deep breathing in standing. Also supported by Manual Assessment of Respiratory Motion (MARM).

Time frame
Baseline (Day 1), Day 1 (immediately after first session), Week 8 (post-intervention), Week 16 (8 weeks after intervention completion)
2

Trunk Flexor Endurance _ McGill Curl-Up Hold Test

Description: Isometric trunk flexor endurance measured as hold time during the McGill Curl-Up Test. A longer time indicates greater endurance. Unit of Measure: seconds

Time frame
Baseline (Day 1), Week 8 (post-intervention), Week 16 (8 weeks after intervention completion)
3

Back Extensor Endurance _Biering-Sørensen Test

Isometric back extensor endurance measured as hold time during the Biering-Sørensen Test. A longer time indicates greater endurance. Unit of Measure: seconds

Time frame
Baseline (Day 1), Week 8 (post-intervention), Week 16 (8 weeks after intervention completion)
4

Movement Speed_10-Meter Sprint Time

Time to complete a 10-meter maximal sprint from a combat/two-point stance, measured with electronic timing gates. Lower time indicates better performance. Unit of Measure: seconds

Time frame
Baseline (Day 1), Week 8 (post-intervention), Week 16 (8 weeks after intervention completion)

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.