Effects of Maitland and Mulligan Spinal Mobilizations Along With Canal Enlargement Exercises in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age25-40
SponsorRiphah International University

About this trial

This randomised controlled trial will evaluate the comparative effects of Maitland versus Mulligan spinal mobilization techniques, when combined with canal enlargement exercises, in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). A total of 38 participants aged 25-40 years with confirmed unilateral LSS will be randomly assigned to receive either Maitland mobilizations or Mulligan mobilizations, along with standard physiotherapy and canal enlargement exercises. The intervention will be administered over three weeks, with four sessions per week. Primary outcomes will include pain intensity (measured by Numeric Pain Rating Scale), disability (Modified Oswestry Disability Index), and symptom severity (Swiss Spinal Stenosis Score), assessed at baseline and post-treatment. This study aims to inform physiotherapy practice by identifying the more effective manual therapy technique for improving functional outcomes in LSS.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age group between 25-40 years

Both males and females will be included

Patient with low back pain along with unilateral radiating symptoms

Having symptoms from at least 3 months with pain severity not more than 7 on NPRS

Disqualifiers

Chronic inflammatory or infectious disease, neoplasm, hematological disorders, traumatic vertebral injuries, Spondylitis

Any concurrent major disease like renal failure, diabetes, cancer, tumor.

Low back pain with bilateral radiating symptoms.

Pregnancy

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Maitland Mobilization Group

    Other intervention

    Participants in this group will receive Maitland Grade III central posterior-anterior spinal mobilizations targeting the lumbar spine. The intervention will be administered by a licensed physiotherapist with the patient in a prone position, applying oscillatory mobilization for 3 sets of 40 seconds with 1-minute rest intervals. Canal enlargement exercises (bilateral knee-to-chest, LION stretch, cat-camel exercise) The total treatment will be administered four sessions per week for three weeks (12 sessions total).

  • Mulligan Mobilization Group

    Other intervention

    Participants in this group will receive Mulligan spinal mobilizations with lower limb movement (SNAGs). The therapist will apply sustained passive glides to the lumbar spinous process while the patient actively elevates the leg in a pain-free range. Mobilizations will be performed in 3 sets of 7-10 repetitions. Canal enlargement exercises (bilateral knee-to-chest, LION stretch, cat-camel exercise) The total treatment will be administered four sessions per week for three weeks (12 sessions total).

Treatment groups

38 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Maitland Mobilization GroupExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Mulligan Mobilization GroupExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Numeric Pain Rating Scale

Pain will be assessed using the 11-point Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), where 0 represents "no pain" and 10 represents "worst possible pain." The scale is a reliable self-reported tool for evaluating pain intensity in musculoskeletal conditions.

Time frame
Baseline and at the end of 3 weeks (post-intervention)
2

Modified Oswestry Disability Index (MODI)

Functional disability will be assessed using the Modified Oswestry Disability Index (MODI), a validated questionnaire that measures the degree of disability related to low back pain. Scores range from 0% (no disability) to 100% (maximum disability).

Time frame
Baseline and at 3 weeks post-intervention
3

Swiss Spinal Stenosis Score (SSSS)

The Swiss Spinal Stenosis Score (SSSS) will be used to assess symptom severity and physical function specific to lumbar spinal stenosis. The tool includes subscales for symptom intensity and function, with higher scores indicating greater impairment.

Time frame
Baseline and at 3 weeks post-intervention

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: