Effects of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation With Neural Mobilization in Stroke Patients

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age45-65
SponsorRiphah International University

About this trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if neuromuscular electrical stimulation combined with upper limb neural mobilization works to improve hand grip and upper limb function in post-stroke patients.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Diagnosed with ischemic stroke (duration ≥ 3 months post-stroke)

Patients with hemiparesis affecting the upper limb have a 15-30 score by the Fugl-Meyer Assessment.

Medically stable for physical therapy

Signed informed consent

Disqualifiers

Patients with pacemakers or implanted electrical devices

Upper limb fractures or contractures

Skin allergies or wounds over the stimulation site

Previously taking physiotherapy for the last 3 months.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Conventional physical therapy

    Other intervention

    Neural mobilization for median, radial, and ulnar nerves. 3 sets of 10 repetitions per nerve for 15 mins with 30 sec rest. Progressed based on tolerance and Range of Motion. Conventional rehabilitation consisted of standardized upper limb exercises, including ROM activities, strengthening exercises, stretching and tsk oriented training. Each treatment session was conducted for 45 minutes.

  • Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation

    Other intervention

    Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) applied to wrist extensors and finger flexors. Frequency: 35 Hz. Pulse width: 250 µs. Duty cycle: 10s on / 20s off. Intensity: Visible muscle contraction, within patient tolerance. Duration: 30 min Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) + 15 min rest/cool-down. Neural mobilization for median, radial, and ulnar nerves. 3 sets of 10 repetitions per nerve with 30 sec rest.

Treatment groups

44 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Control groupActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Experimental groupExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Handheld dynamometer

The standard Jamar hydraulic handgrip dynamometer with reliability (ICC = 0.95-0.98) was used according to established ASHT (American Society of Hand Therapists) protocols for the measurement of hand grip strength. The patient was seated with shoulder adducted, elbow flexed at 90°, forearm neutral, and wrist 0-30° extension. A total of three trials (kg) with a 1-minute rest between trials was done, and the mean of the 3 values was recorded.

Time frame
Baseline and 6th week
2

Goniometer

A clinically accepted instrument with high reliability (ICC: 0.85 - 0.99), in accordance with standardised assessment protocols. Each movement was measured across three trails with a 1-minute rest period between trails, and the average of the three readings (in degrees) was used for statistical analysis.

Time frame
baseline and 6th week
3

Fugl-Meyer Assessment - Upper Extremity

The scale assesses motor recovery by observing movement patterns that advance from proximal to distal joints and from mass synergistic actions to more selective, isolated movements following a stroke. It consists of 4 sections: shoulder-arm, wrist, hand, and coordination and speed. It comprises 33 test items, each scored on a three-point ordinal scale (0-2) with a maximum achievable score of 66. In stroke patients the scale has revealed high reliability (ICC: 0.993 - 0.997).

Time frame
Baseline and 6th week

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: