Effects of Sahrmann's Versus Janda Approach in Lower Crossed Syndrome Patients

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-40
SponsorRiphah International University

About this trial

Muscular imbalance due to prolonged sitting or standing posture leads to a condition lower cross syndrome(LCS) or lumbopelvic syndrome. Several stretching and strengthening regimens are used to treat cross pattern of muscular tightness and weakness in LCS. This study aims to compare the effects of Sahrmann's versus Janda's approach on pain, pelvic tilt and lumbar lordosis in lower crossed syndrome patients.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

• Gender (both)

Age (18 to 40)

Participants who fulfilled the criteria of lower cross syndrome

Disqualifiers

• Any serious pathology i.e. Neoplasm

Any history of trauma

Spinal malalignment i.e. Scoliosis

Receiving any other form of Physical therapy treatment

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Sahrmann's approach

    Other intervention

    1. single knee to chest and double knee to chest 2. Rectus femoris stretching 3. kneeling psoas stretch 4. piriformis stretch in pigeon pose 5. lying piriformis stretch 6. Sit and reach stretch 1.Clamshell (side lying) strengthening of gluteus medius 2.Hip abduction gluteus medius strengthening 3.Extension of femur 4.isometric abdominal contraction(top to floor) 5. abdominal contraction(cat exercise)

  • Jandas approach

    Other intervention

    1.50 to 70 degrees of trunk flexion 2.Pelvis tilting 3.One leg standing 4.Quadreped position (forward and backward movement) 5. Quadruped position (raising opposite arm and leg) 6. pelvic bridging 7.One leg bridge 8.Side Plank 9.Abdominal bracing 10. Knee active bending 90 degrees 11. Half Crunch

Treatment groups

54 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Sahrmann's approachExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Janda ApproachActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Numeric pain rate scale (NPRS) for pain

The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS) is an 11-point, standardized assessment tool used to measure subjective pain intensity. Ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("the worst pain imaginable"), it provides healthcare providers with a quick and reliable method to evaluate pain severity, track symptom changes, and measure treatment effectiveness

Time frame
upto 4 weeks
2

Flexible Ruler for lumbar Lordosis (degree)

To measure lumbar lordosis using a flexible ruler (flexicurve), mold it to the curvature of your spine from T12 to S2. Trace the curve onto paper to find the curve's length (\\(L\\)) and the maximum perpendicular height (\\(H\\)). Calculate the angle in degrees using the equation: \\(\\theta = 4 \\times \\arctan(2H/L)\\).

Time frame
upto 4 weeks
3

I Handy Level for Pelvic tilt(degree)

The examiner performed the process three times, and during those three trials, the best view was acquired, the normal average anterior pelvic tilt angle is 9.6±3.5 and 11.7±3.8° in males and females, respectively

Time frame
upto 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: