Efficacy of Vicarious Post-Traumatic Growth Intervention for Nurses in Emergency Units

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
AgeNot listed
SponsorFatima Jinnah Women University

About this trial

This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the efficacy of a Vicarious Post-Traumatic Growth (VPTG) Intervention among nurses working in emergency units. Emergency nurses are frequently exposed to traumatic events through patient care, which may contribute to vicarious trauma and psychological distress. The intervention is designed to facilitate positive psychological growth, resilience, adaptive coping, and psychological well-being while reducing the adverse impact of indirect trauma exposure. Participants will be randomly assigned to intervention and control groups. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, post-intervention, and follow-up periods to determine the effectiveness of the intervention in promoting vicarious post-traumatic growth and reducing vicarious trauma among emergency nurses.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Registered nurses currently employed in emergency departments.

Minimum six months of emergency department work experience.

Able to read and understand English or Urdu.

Willing to provide informed consent.

Disqualifiers

Current diagnosis of severe psychiatric disorder requiring intensive treatment.

Current participation in trauma-focused psychotherapy.

Cognitive impairment affecting study participation.

Planned transfer from emergency unit during study period.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Psychoeducational Vicarious Post-Traumatic Growth Intervention

    Behavioral

    A structured psychoeducational and behavioral intervention designed to promote vicarious post-traumatic growth and reduce vicarious trauma among emergency nurses. The intervention incorporates cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) techniques, mindfulness practices, resilience-building exercises, psychoeducation regarding vicarious trauma, stress management strategies, reflective activities, and peer-support components. The program is delivered in scheduled sessions over the intervention period and aims to enhance coping skills, psychological well-being, professional functioning, and post-traumatic growth.

Treatment groups

60 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Vicarious Post-Traumatic Growth InterventionExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Routine Professional SupportNo intervention 0 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Change in Vicarious Posttraumatic Growth Score

This outcome measures change in vicarious posttraumatic growth among emergency unit nurses exposed to the intervention. Vicarious posttraumatic growth will be assessed using the Vicarious Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (VPTGI; Deaton, 2020), a self-report questionnaire. The total score will be calculated by summing item responses. Higher scores indicate greater vicarious posttraumatic growth (better psychological outcome).

Time frame
Baseline (Week 0), Post-intervention (Week 8), 3-month follow-up (Week 20), 6-month follow-up (Week 32)

Secondary outcomes

1

Change in Vicarious Trauma Score

This outcome measures vicarious trauma symptoms among emergency nurses. The Vicarious Trauma Scale (VTS; Vrklevski \& Franklin, 2008) will be used. The total score is obtained by summing item responses. Higher scores indicate greater vicarious trauma (worse psychological outcome).

Time frame
Baseline (Week 0), Post-intervention (Week 8), 3-month follow-up (Week 20), 6-month follow-up (Week 32)
2

Change in Resilience Score

Resilience will be assessed using the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS), which measures the ability to recover from stress. Scores are calculated as the mean of all items. Higher scores indicate greater resilience (better outcome).

Time frame
Baseline (Week 0), Post-intervention (Week 8), 3-month follow-up (Week 20), 6-month follow-up (Week 32)
3

Change in Coping Strategies

Coping strategies will be assessed using the CSI-SF, measuring both adaptive and maladaptive coping styles. Scores will be reported as subscale and total scores. Higher adaptive coping scores indicate better coping outcomes.

Time frame
Baseline (Week 0), Post-intervention (Week 8), 3-month follow-up (Week 20), 6-month follow-up (Week 32)
4

Change in Psychological Well-being

Psychological well-being will be assessed using the 18-item Psychological Well-being Scale. Total scores will be computed by summing item responses. Higher scores indicate better psychological well-being.

Time frame
Baseline (Week 0), Post-intervention (Week 8), 3-month follow-up (Week 20), 6-month follow-up (Week 32)

Other outcomes

1

Personality Traits

Personality traits (Big Five dimensions) will be assessed using the Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI). Scores will be calculated for each trait dimension. This measure will be used as a baseline covariate and moderator, not as an intervention outcome.

Time frame
Baseline only (Week 0)
2

Intervention Adherence

Measured as the percentage of attended intervention sessions (CBT, mindfulness, psychoeducation, peer support). Reported as percentage (%) of completed sessions per participant.

Time frame
Throughout intervention period (Weeks 1-8)
3

Intervention Fidelity

Assessed using a structured fidelity checklist completed by supervisors to ensure protocol adherence. Reported as percentage of protocol components delivered correctly.

Time frame
During intervention delivery (Weeks 1-8)
4

Attrition Rate

Number and percentage of participants who drop out of the study at each assessment point.

Time frame
Post-intervention (Week 8), 3-month follow-up (Week 20), 6-month follow-up (Week 32)

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.