Electroporation vs. Radiofrequency Ablation Guided by 3D Imaging in Repeat Procedures for Atrial Fibrillation

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-85
SponsorWroclaw Medical University

About this trial

This is a prospective, randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of two techniques for repeat catheter ablation in patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF): thermal energy ablation (radiofrequency) and non-thermal electroporation (pulsed field ablation), both guided by 3D imaging systems.

Patients undergoing repeat AF ablation will be randomly assigned to receive either thermal or electroporation ablation, performed according to standard hospital protocols. No additional invasive procedures are required. Following the ablation, participants will attend follow-up visits at 3, 6, and 12 months, including medical history review, physical examination, 12-lead ECG, and 24-hour Holter monitoring. Unscheduled ECG assessments will also be available if arrhythmia symptoms occur.

All study-related procedures are non-invasive and align with routine post-ablation care. Risks are limited to those typically associated with standard AF ablation procedures.

The main benefit of participation is close, structured follow-up by experienced electrophysiologists, allowing for early detection of arrhythmia recurrence and timely medical intervention when necessary.

Participant confidentiality and data protection will be ensured in accordance with GDPR regulations.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

None

Disqualifiers

None

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Pulsed field ablation of reccurent atrial arrythmia

    Procedure/Surgery

    Substrate modification strategy based ablation of reccurent atrial arrythmia following pulmonary viens isolation employing pulsed field ablation with 3D guidance and high density mapping

  • Radiofrequency ablation of reccurent atrial arrythmia (standard of care)

    Procedure/Surgery

    Standard radiofrequncy ablation of reccurent atrial arrythmia following pulmonary vien isolation employing substrate modification strategy

Treatment groups

250 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: PFA groupActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: RFA groupActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Freedom from atrial arrythmia in 12 month observation period

PFA is non-inferior to RFA in achieving freedom from documented atrial arrhythmia (AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia) lasting ≥30 seconds at 12 months after the index ablation procedure, as assessed by 12-lead ECG, 24-hour Holter monitoring, or symptomatic ECG recordings.

Time frame
12 months observation

Secondary outcomes

1

Comparison of skin-to-skin time between PFA and RFA group

The parameter will be measured from vascular access to catheter removal.

Time frame
Data recorded during the procedure
2

Comparison of total fluoroscopy time between PFA and RFA group

The parameter is recorded by the electrophysiology system during the ablation procedure - total fluoroscopy exposure time (in seconds).

Time frame
Data recorded during the procedure
3

Comparison of total ablation time between PFA and RFA group

The parameter will be measured from the end of electroanatomical mapping to re-mapping.

Time frame
Data recorded during the procedure
4

Comparison of total radiation dose between PFA and RFA group

The parameter is recorded by the electrophysiology system during the ablation procedure as radiation dose (uGym2).

Time frame
Data recorded during the procedure

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.