Erythritol Air Polishing in Mucositis Treatment

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-80
SponsorUniversity of Coimbra

About this trial

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of air polishing systems compared to the exclusive use of oral hygiene instruction in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Adults with at least one implant in function for a minimum of one year affected by peri-implant mucositis.

Disqualifiers

Pregnant or lactating women

patients unable to understand the treatment protocol and sign informed consent and/or patients younger than 18 years old,

medical conditions that prevents an oral examination,

incapability to perform oral hygiene measures due to physical or mental disorders,

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Air-polishing with erythritol at different time points

    Procedure/Surgery

    The air-polishing device will be inserted into each site of the peri-implant pocket at an angle ranging from 60 to 90 degrees, and each surface will be debrided for 5 seconds using erythritol powder (AIRFLOW Powder PERIO; EMS). In this group this procedure will be done ate baseline, 1 month and 2 months

  • Single Air-polishing with erythritol

    Procedure/Surgery

    The air-polishing device will be inserted into each site of the peri-implant pocket at an angle ranging from 60 to 90 degrees, and each surface will be debrided for 5 seconds using erythritol powder (AIRFLOW Powder PERIO; EMS). In this group this procedure will be done ate baseline only.

Treatment groups

24 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups
Group A: Test Group Erythritol Monthly ApplicationsExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Control groupNo intervention 0 interventions
Group C: Test Group Erythritol Single ApplicationExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Changes in Bleeding on Probing compared to baseline

Bleeding on Probing (BoP) will be evaluated according to the modified bleeding index (0-no BoP; 1- punctiform drop of bleed; 2- confluent red continuous line formed through the sulcus; 3-heavy/profuse), for each site

Time frame
Baseline, 3 months and 6 months

Secondary outcomes

1

Probing Pocket Depth

Measured in mm from the mucosal margin to most apical point of the pocket

Time frame
Baseline, 3 months and 6 months
2

Plaque index (PI)

assessed dichotomously as the presence or absence of plaque along the mucosal/gingival margin

Time frame
Baseline, 3 months and 6 months
3

Gingival Recession

Distance, measured in mm from the cementoenamel junction to the gingival margin

Time frame
Baseline, 3 months and 6 months
4

Radiographic bone level

calculated as the difference between the marginal bone levels assessed at follow-up visits and the ones assessed in the baseline

Time frame
Baseline, 3 months and 6 months

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.