Peri-implant Mucositis

This study compares two types of dental implants, short implants (6 millimeters or less in length) and standard implants (longer than 8 millimeters), to evaluate their effect on the health of the gum and bone tissue surrounding the implant. Approximately 40 patients receiving a total of 80 dental implants will be followed. Researchers will assess clinical signs of gum health around the implants, measure specific protein levels (biomarkers) in the fluid surrounding the implants associated with gum disease. The goal of this study is to determine whether implant length affects the risk of inflammation or infection around dental implants, which may help guide treatment decisions in the future.

Peri-implant diseases are inflammatory conditions affecting the gums and bone around dental implants. Peri-implant mucositis causes inflammation in the gums, while peri-implantitis can also lead to bone loss and, in severe cases, implant failure. Smoking is an important risk factor for these conditions because it may change how the immune system responds to inflammation and infection. This study will compare smokers and non-smokers with healthy dental implants, peri-implant mucositis, or peri-implantitis. Fluid samples will be collected from around the implants to measure proteins involved in inflammation, healing, and immune responses. The aim is to better understand how smoking affects the body's response to peri-implant diseases and to identify biological markers that may help assess disease risk and severity in the future.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether a home-use light device helps control gum inflammation around dental implants in adults who have a full set of fixed teeth attached to implants. This gum inflammation, called peri-implant mucositis, is common and reversible, but can lead to more serious problems if it is not controlled. The device is meant to be added to the usual professional cleaning and hygiene care, not to replace it. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does adding the home-use light device reduce gum bleeding around the implants more than the usual care alone? * Does it reduce the depth of the space around the implants and the amount of harmful bacteria? Researchers will compare adults who receive the usual professional care plus the home-use light device with adults who receive the usual professional care alone, to see if the device improves gum health. Participants will: * Receive professional cleaning and personalized instructions on how to keep their implant teeth clean at the start of the study. * Be placed by chance into one of two groups: usual care plus the home-use light device, or usual care alone. * Use the light device at home each day for 4 weeks (if in the device group) * Visit the clinic at the start, after 2 weeks, and after 4 weeks for gum checkups and to have bacteria samples taken.

This study aims to evaluate the effects of autogenous grafts harvested from different palatal regions on the peri-implant mucosa when applied during second-stage dental implant surgery. Clinical, radiographic, and digital assessment methods will be used to investigate the early effects of these grafts on peri-implant mucosal width and thickness. In addition, peri-implant tissue health and patient-reported outcomes will be evaluated to compare the effectiveness of the grafting techniques in peri-implant soft tissue management.

Inflammation of the tissue surrounding a dental implant (peri-implantitis or peri-implant mucositis) can lead to implant loss in advanced stages. The AmbiJet system utilizes cold atmospheric plasma (CAP), a physical procedure with a strong antibacterial effect. This clinical trial investigates whether the additional application of cold plasma directly on the patient following conventional mechanical cleaning of the implants is safe, well-tolerated, and resolves inflammation more quickly compared to standard treatment.

Evaluate whether the type of probe (plastic vs. metallic) modifies the accuracy of peri-implant probing in single-unit implants, by comparing the probing depth recorded with the prosthesis in place versus without the prosthesis (ΔPD, mm). Secondarily, explore the influence of prosthetic design and implant position on probing values and on other clinical and radiographic parameters.

This double arm, split-mouth, single centre, controlled, randomised clinical study is designed to examine the effect of implantoplasty in treatment of peri-implantitis. Peri-implantitis will be treated with open flap debridement, with or without implantoplasty.

This randomized controlled clinical trial investigates the effectiveness of trehalose powder compared to glycine powder when used in air-polishing during supportive therapy for peri-implant mucositis, a reversible inflammatory condition affecting the soft tissues around dental implants. A total of 40 adult patients with peri-implant mucositis will be enrolled and randomly assigned to receive non-surgical periodontal therapy combined with air-polishing using either trehalose powder (test group) or glycine powder (control group). Clinical parameters will be evaluated at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. These include Plaque Index (PI), Bleeding on Probing (BoP), Probing Pocket Depth (PPD), and Bleeding Score (BS), in order to assess plaque accumulation, inflammation, and bleeding. The primary objective is to compare the reduction in plaque levels between the two groups over the study period. Secondary outcomes include evaluation of changes in gingival inflammation and probing depths, as well as assessment of implant surface integrity through in vitro scanning electron microscopy (SEM) after treatment. The aim of the study is to determine whether trehalose powder offers improved clinical outcomes and greater implant surface preservation compared to glycine powder in the non-surgical management of peri-implant mucositis.

This study aims to observe the effects of keratinized mucosa width on peri-implant tissues by evaluating clinical and biochemical parameters. The main question it aims to answer is: Would increasing the width of the keratinized mucosa with free gingival graft (FGG) in peri-implant mucositis be beneficial in terms of clinical periodontal parameters and peri-implant crevicular fluid levels of inflammatory cytokines compared to non-surgical therapy alone? Our study consists of 4 groups: Peri-implant healthy group with sufficient keratinized mucosa (≥ 2mm) (n=16), peri-implant mucositis group with sufficient keratinized mucosa (n=16), peri-implant mucositis group with insufficient keratinized mucosa (\< 2mm) receiving only non-surgical treatment (n=16), peri-implant mucositis group with insufficient keratinized mucosa receiving FGG in addition to non-surgical treatment (n=16). Clinical and biochemical measurements will be recorded at the baseline, 1st month, 4th month and 7th month of the study. Peri-implant crevicular fluid samples will be collected at baseline, 1st month, 4th month and 7th month. IL-1β, RANKL, OPG levels, and RANKL/OPG ratio will be analyzed from collected samples. Researchers will evaluate the possible benefits of FGG application in addition to non-surgical therapy by comparing the biochemical and clinical changes in areas with and without FGG application in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis.

This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate and compare the efficacy of different interproximal oral hygiene devices for biofilm removal around posterior single dental implants in patients diagnosed with peri-implant mucositis. Peri-implant mucositis is a reversible inflammatory condition of the peri-implant soft tissues caused primarily by bacterial biofilm accumulation. Effective plaque control is essential for the prevention of disease progression to peri-implantitis. However, there is limited clinical evidence regarding the comparative effectiveness of different interproximal oral hygiene devices in implant-supported sites. A total of approximately 75 patients with posterior single implants and peri-implant mucositis will be recruited. Participants will be randomly allocated to one of the study groups, each using a specific interproximal oral hygiene device as part of their daily oral hygiene regimen. All participants will receive standardized oral hygiene instructions at baseline. Clinical parameters related to peri-implant inflammation and plaque accumulation will be assessed at baseline and at follow-up visits at 1, 3, and 6 months. The primary outcome is the reduction of peri-implant biofilm accumulation. Secondary outcomes include changes in clinical inflammatory parameters around the implants. The results of this study are expected to provide clinically relevant evidence to support evidence-based recommendations for interproximal oral hygiene in patients with dental implants affected by peri-implant mucositis.

This study aims to evaluate the effect of water floss in reversing peri- implant mucositis around dental implants

1. Background and Rationale The visual diagnosis of peri-implant mucosal erythema (redness), a key sign of inflammation, is highly subjective and varies significantly among clinicians, leading to inconsistencies in early detection and monitoring of peri-implant diseases. There is a critical need for an objective, quantitative, and reliable tool to standardize this assessment. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and colorimetric analysis of digital intraoral scans offer a promising solution to this clinical challenge. 2. Primary Objectives This diagnostic study aims to: Develop and validate a core colorimetric index that objectively quantifies mucosal erythema from digital intraoral scan data. Develop and validate an AI model that automatically calculates this index and provides a binary diagnosis (erythema present/absent) at the image level. Develop and validate a second AI model for precise localization (object detection) of erythematous regions on standard clinical software screenshots. Evaluate the clinical utility of the AI system by assessing its impact on the diagnostic accuracy, consistency, and confidence of clinicians with varying experience levels. 3. Study Design This is a multiphase diagnostic accuracy study conducted at a single academic center. It comprises three sequential phases with independent validation: Phase 1 (Development \& Internal Validation): Analysis of intraoral scans to derive the color index and train the AI models using an internal dataset. Phase 2 (External Technical Validation): Prospective validation of the trained AI models on an independent cohort of patients from a separate branch of the hospital. Phase 3 (Clinical Utility Assessment): A prospective, controlled, observer study where clinicians perform diagnoses with and without AI assistance. 4. Participants and Methods Data Source: Adult patients with dental implants who received intraoral scans using a 3Shape TRIOS 3 scanner. Image Data: Two formats are used: 1) Processed 3D surface files (PLY format) for colorimetric analysis, and 2) Standardized 2D screenshots from the 3Shape software for object detection. Reference Standards: Expert consensus on erythema (primary) and Bleeding on Probing (BOP, clinical inflammatory standard). AI Development: Deep learning models (e.g., convolutional neural networks) will be trained for index calculation, image-level diagnosis, and region localization. Observer Study: Participating clinicians (experts, general dentists, and students) will diagnose a set of test images both unaided and with AI assistance (which displays the color index value and/or bounding boxes). 5. Key Outcome Measures Diagnostic Accuracy: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity (with 95% confidence intervals). Technical Performance: Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for automated measurement agreement; Mean Average Precision (mAP) and Dice Similarity Coefficient for object detection. Clinical Impact: Change in diagnostic accuracy (AUC), inter-observer agreement (Kappa), and diagnostic confidence scores when using AI assistance. 6. Significance This study seeks to translate a subjective clinical sign into an objective, AI-powered diagnostic biomarker. If successful, the proposed system could become a valuable decision-support tool in daily practice and clinical research, promoting earlier, more consistent, and standardized monitoring of peri-implant tissue health, ultimately improving patient care.

Despite technological advances that have significantly improved dental implant osseointegration and survival rates, biological complications such as peri-implantitis and peri-implant mucositis are common around the implant. The active form of vitamin D, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D3), can be induced by the expression of leucine-lysine-37 (LL-37), a human antimicrobial peptide in the cathelicidin family. Studies have shown that 1,25(OH)2D3 and its precursor, 25(OH)D3, significantly reduce inflammation by suppressing the release of receptor activator nuclear factor kappa b ligand (RANKL), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-1, and IL-6, and by preventing alveolar bone loss. To date, many cytokines have been investigated in peri-implant sulcus fluid (PIOS). The lack of a direct study investigating vitamin D and LL-37 levels in PIOS constitutes the unique value of this project. This study aims to compare LL-37 and 25(OH)D3 levels in PIOS and examine their correlation with markers such as IL-6, IL-10, and MMP-8, as well as clinical parameters. Volunteers aged 18-65 who have received dental implants at the Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University Faculty of Dentistry and have been using their implant-supported prosthesis for at least one year and who have been informed about this study will be included in the study. The groups will be formed as peri-implant health, peri-implant mucositis, and peri-implantitis. The implants of the patients included in the study will be evaluated for probed pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL), suppuration (S), modified gingival index (mGI), plaque index (mPI), bleeding index (mBI), keratinized gingival amount, and attached gingival amount. PIOS and serum samples will be obtained from patients, and their relationship to periodontal status and each other will be statistically evaluated. This project may help discover new biomarkers that can be used in the early diagnosis of peri-implantar diseases. This study could contribute to earlier treatment, lower patient costs, and even the development of new treatment plans for these diseases.

The study aims to establish a validated protocol enabling an alternative approach for bacterial biofilm control through the application of a novel at-home photodynamic/antibacterial blue light therapy in addition to non-surgical professional treatment (NST) for peri-implant mucositis. The primary outcomes will include reductions in plaque and bleeding scores, decreases in probing pocket depth, and lower aMMP-8 levels in PISF. Secondary outcomes will include changes in keratinized peri-implant mucosa (KPIM) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

A double-blind randomized-controlled clinical trial is conducted in order to evaluate the impact of non-surgical periodontal treatment on endothelial dysfunction parameters in subjects with peri-implantitis/peri-implant mucositis and without any cardiovascular disease.

the objective of this study is to determine the incidence of peri-implant mucositis in patients with treated periodontitis and enrolled in periodontal maintenance and to evaluate the associated risk indicators. An analytical prospective observational study will be carried out, with an initial follow-up of 12 months.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn how different materials used in dental implants affect the surrounding gum tissue in adults who need dental implants. The main questions it aims to answer are: How do different materials (titanium, PEEK, zirconia, and lithium disilicate) affect inflammation around dental implants? What changes occur in inflammation markers in the gum tissue after 3 and 6 months? Researchers will compare the different materials to see which one causes the least amount of inflammation. Participants will: Receive dental implants made from different materials. Have samples of fluid from around their implants collected for analysis at 3 and 6 months. Undergo regular dental check-ups to measure gum health, such as bleeding and pocket depth around the implants.

The aim of this study is to analyse contiguous dental implants and its peri-implant status depending on different inter-implant distances.

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of air polishing systems compared to the exclusive use of oral hygiene instruction in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis

Patients included in the study will be recruited after arriving at the Faculty of Dentistry of the University of Zagreb. During the clinical examination, the patient's periodontal status (bleeding during probing, and the depth of the pockets around the implant) and a control x-ray will be taken to check bone loss. Saliva sampling will occur at 3-time points, when establishing the diagnosis of periimplantitis, before the start of therapy, and at the first control after treatment.

The main aim of the present study is to investigate implant success rate after 5 years of function of immediate (Test group; within 7 days of implant placement) versus delayed (Control group; 8 weeks after implant placement) loading of two-pieces zirconia implant, placed in pristine bone without bone regeneration. Implant success rate will be defined according to Buser's criteria. Secondary endpoints: Marginal bone level (MBL) evaluation by means of standardized radiographs; Clinical evaluation of biological (e.g. Plaque Index, PI; Probing Pocket Depth, PPD, Bleeding on Probing, BOP; suppuration upon probing/palpation) and prosthetic/technical complications; Clinical evaluation of soft tissue width, keratinized tissue, marginal and interproximal soft tissue recession; Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) by questionnaire administration: