ESPB Versus SPSIPB for Quality of Recovery After Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-85
SponsorSaglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital

About this trial

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is associated with moderate to severe postoperative pain despite its minimally invasive nature. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and serratus posterior superior intercostal plane block (SPSIPB) are promising regional analgesic techniques for thoracic surgery; however, evidence directly comparing their effects on postoperative quality of recovery remains limited. This prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial aims to compare the effects of ESPB and SPSIPB on postoperative quality of recovery, measured by the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) questionnaire at 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include postoperative pain scores, tramadol consumption, time to first rescue analgesia, rescue analgesic requirement, postoperative nausea and vomiting, patient satisfaction, length of hospital stay, block-related complications, and perioperative hemodynamic parameters.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Adults aged 18-85 years.

ASA physical status I-III.

Scheduled for elective VATS under general anesthesia.

Able to understand and complete the QoR-15 questionnaire.

Disqualifiers

Refusal to participate or inability to provide written informed consent.

Known allergy or contraindication to bupivacaine, paracetamol, dexketoprofen, or tramadol.

Infection at the planned block injection site.

Coagulopathy or ongoing anticoagulant therapy precluding regional anesthesia.

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • ESPB
  • SPSIPB

Treatment groups

128 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups