ESWT vs HILT in Chronic Lateral Epicondylitis

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age40-50
SponsorKafrelsheikh University

About this trial

This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effectiveness of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT) and High-Intensity Laser Therapy (HILT) in patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

• Age 40-50 years.

Clinically diagnosed chronic lateral epicondylitis.

Symptoms lasting more than 3 months.

Positive clinical provocation tests.

Disqualifiers

• Previous elbow surgery.

Corticosteroid injection within the last 6 months.

Cervical radiculopathy.

Peripheral nerve entrapment.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Extracorporeal shock wave therapy

    Device

    The Group will receive ESWT plus conventional physiotherapy treatment program. Regarding ESWT protocol, the group will receive 1,000, 1,500, and 2,000 pulses during the first, second, and third through fifth treatments, respectively (pressure, 2.5 bar; frequency, 8 Hz; energy density, 0.4 mJ/mm2). The patients received 5 ESWT treatments once per week. The treatments were performed using a Rosetta ESWT (CR Technology, Korea). Ultrasound gel was applied between the apparatus head and skin. The procedure was performed in the area with the most intense pain. Treatment was administered at the anterior aspect of the LE and three points around it at a radius of 1.5-2 cm. The treatment time did not exceed 10 minutes. During the treatments, the patients did not receive any drugs (Lizis, 2015).

  • Conventional Physical Therapy

    Other intervention

    The conventional program will include TENS for twenty minutes in elbow region; the use of pulse ultrasound with duty cycle 80% on the lateral epicondyle for five minutes with an intensity of 0.8 W per every cm'; the use of ice for ten minutes; training for correcting the daily activities to minimize pressure on the elbow (preferentially, holding, lifting and pressing the objects will be asked to be carried out in supination); and, stretch and strain wrist muscle strengthening exercises (Fekri et al., 2019). The exercise therapy method involved six elbow joint exercises. They are a total of six exercises (Fig. 2) for patients with tennis elbow. Each exercise will be performed three times a day, with each session involving five repetitions of the movement, over four weeks, gradually increasing weight until the movement is effective but below the pain threshold. Painful movements will be avoided, and exercises causing pain or discomfort will be discontinued following consultation from a p

  • High-power intinsty laser

    Device

    The Group will receive HILT plus conventional physiotherapy treatment program. High-power laser used in the present research paper was MLS Laser, Model M6 (ASA), that will be included in class four lasers device, with maximum 25-Watt power, average power of 3.3 Watts, wavelength of 808 nm in a continuous state. The target region diameter in this device will be 5 cm and the energy used for treating the patients will be 272.4 Jules, and the energy density will be 13.89 Jules per cm' with a 700-hertz frequency for a period of three minutes on the lateral epicondyle and the origin of the wrist's extensor muscles (Fekri et al., 2019).

Treatment groups

72 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups
Group A: Group AActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Group BActive comparator 2 interventions
Group C: Group C:Active comparator 2 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

1. Pain intensity measured using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).

Time frame
at baseline 4 weeks and 8 weeks
2

2. Grip strength measured using Hand Dynamometer.

Time frame
at baseline 4 weeks and 8 weeks
3

3. Upper limb disability measured using QuickDASH Questionnaire.

Time frame
at baseline 4 weeks and 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes

1

1. Pressure Pain Threshold using Algometer.

Time frame
at baseline 4 weeks and 8 weeks
2

2. Pinch Strength Measurement.

Time frame
at baseline 4 weeks and 8 weeks
3

3. Elbow Range of Motion (ROM).

Time frame
at baseline 4 weeks and 8 weeks
4

4. Oxford Elbow Score (OES).

Time frame
at baseline 4 weeks and 8 weeks

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: