Evaluating a Digital Intervention to Improve Adolescent Condom Use and Communication

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age14-17
SponsorNorth Carolina Agriculture & Technical State University

About this trial

The purpose of this study is to test the effectiveness, likability, and implementation potential of PACT, an adapted digital program to teach non-heterosexual adolescent boys about sexual consent and condom negotiation in a randomized controlled trial over 9 months.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

14-17 years old

lives in the U.S.

identifies as a queer teen guy or sexual minority male

Disqualifiers

younger than 14

older than 17

does not live in U.S.

does not identify as a queer teen guy or sexual minority male

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Promoting Assertive Communication among Teens (PACT)

    Other intervention

    See Arm Description

  • Healthy Minds

    Other intervention

    See Arm Description

Treatment groups

300 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Promoting Assertive Communication among Teens (PACT)Experimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Healthy MindsActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Condom negotiation intentions

Participants' likelihood of using a condom during sexual intercourse with a partner

Time frame
Baseline, immediately post-intervention, 3 months, 9 months
2

Affirmative consent intentions

Participants' likelihood of 1) ensuring consent is obtained from a partner prior to sexual intercourse and 2) communicating their consent affirmatively to a partner prior to intercourse

Time frame
Baseline, immediately post-intervention, 3 months, 9 months
3

Condom negotiation self-efficacy

Participants' confidence in their ability to assert their desire to use a condom with a partner (5-point likert, strongly disagree to strongly agree, higher scores = higher self-efficacy)

Time frame
Baseline, immediately post-intervention, 3 months, 9 months
4

Affirmative consent self-efficacy

Participants' confidence in their ability to communicate sexual consent with a partner (4-point likert, "not at all confident" to "very confident", higher scores = higher self-efficacy)

Time frame
Baseline, immediately post-intervention, 3 months, 9 months

Secondary outcomes

1

Condom use

Behavioral outcome measuring whether a condom was used for sexual intercourse

Time frame
Baseline, 3 months, 9 months
2

Condom negotiation

Behavioral outcome measuring discussion about condom use prior to sexual intercourse

Time frame
Baseline, 3 months, 9 months
3

Affirmative consent communication

Behavioral outcome measuring affirmative consent communication before and during sexual intercourse

Time frame
Baseline, 3 months, 9 months
4

Condom attitudes

Participants' beliefs about the importance of condom use (items from the Condom Attitudes scale, strongly disagree to strongly agree, higher scores = more positive attitudes)

Time frame
Baseline, immediately post-intervention, 3 months, 9 months

Other outcomes

1

Dose

How much of the intervention did participants complete?

Time frame
Immediately post-intervention
2

Cost

How much does it cost to implement the intervention?

Time frame
Baseline

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

North Carolina Agriculture & Technical State University

Lead sponsor

National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)

Collaborator

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: