Evaluating Food Messaging Campaigns for Young Adults

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-29
SponsorStanford University

About this trial

This study aims to determine whether online social media campaigns improve diet quality among young adults. Young adults will be exposed to one of three social media campaigns.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

18-29 years old

Reside in the US

Speak English

Use Instagram 3-4 times per week or more

Disqualifiers

Younger than 18 years or older than 29 years

Do not reside in the US

Do not speak English

Use Instagram less than 3-4 times per week

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Counter-marketing

    Behavioral

    Participants will receive messages focused on exposing and undermining deceptive, harmful, or misleading marketing practices used by food companies to sell unhealthy foods. Messages are delivered via Instagram posts.

  • Health education

    Behavioral

    Participants will receive messages about the health consequences of sugary drinks and processed snack foods. Messages are delivered via Instagram posts.

  • Control (neutral) messages

    Behavioral

    Participants will receive messages describing neutral topic unrelated to food (fire and home safety). Messages are delivered via Instagram posts.

Treatment groups

750 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups
Group A: Counter-marketing messagesExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Health education messagesExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group C: Control (neutral) messagesActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Diet quality (Healthy Eating Index-2020 score)

Overall diet quality calculated from up to two unannounced, nonconsecutive 24-hour dietary recalls (1 weekend day, 1 weekday) collected via NCI's Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Assessment Tool (ASA24) at each time point. Healthy Eating Index-2020 scores reflect alignment with the US Dietary Guidelines for Americans; higher scores indicate healthier diet quality (i.e., greater intake of fruits, vegetables, whole grains, dairy, protein, and unsaturated fats and lower intake of saturated fat, sodium, added sugars, and refined grains).

Time frame
At 0-months (baseline), 3-months (immediately post- intervention), and 9-months (6-months post-intervention)

Secondary outcomes

1

Consumption of target food groups

Consumption of the food groups targeted in the campaigns (sugary drinks, processed sweet and salty snack foods) will be assessed using two unannounced, nonconsecutive 24-hour dietary recalls (1 weekend day, 1 weekday) collected via NCI's Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Assessment Tool (ASA24) at each time point. Servings of each target food group will be calculated and summed such that higher values indicate higher consumption of the target food groups.

Time frame
At 0-months (baseline), 3-months (immediately post-intervention), and 9-months (6-months post-intervention)
2

Internalized weight stigma

Survey items will assess internalized weight stigma using the 11-item Modified Weight Bias Internalization Scale (e.g., "I am less attractive than most other people because of my weight."). Responses will be measured on 5-point Likert scale ranging from "Strongly disagree" (1) to "Strongly agree" (5). Responses will be coded such that higher scores indicate higher internalized weight stigma. Responses to the 11 items will be averaged.

Time frame
At 0-months (baseline), 3-months (immediately post-intervention), and 9-months (6-months post-intervention).
3

Disordered eating attitudes and behaviors

Survey items will assess disordered eating attitudes and behaviors using the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q), a 28-item self-report questionnaire assessing the range, frequency, and severity of disordered eating attitudes and behaviors, including restraint, eating concern, shape concern, and weight concern. Responses will be measured on a 6-point scale, ranging from "No days" or "None of the times" or "Not at all" or "Not at all markedly" (each coded as 0) to "Every day" or "Every time" or "Markedly" or "Moderately" (each coded as 5). Following scoring guidance, global scores will be calculated as follows: analyses will sum responses within each of the 4 subscales (restraint, eating concern, shape concern, and weight concern), divide those scores by the number of items in the subscale, sum the subscale scores, and divide this sum by 4. Higher global scores indicate higher frequency or severity of disordered eating attitudes and behaviors.

Time frame
At 0-months (baseline), 3-months (immediately post-intervention), and 9-months (6-months post-intervention)
4

Attitudes toward unhealthy food companies

Survey items will assess the extent to which participants feel positively or negatively toward food companies that sell unhealthy foods with 2 items: "How do you feel about companies that sell sugary drinks?" and "How do you feel about companies that sell processed sweet and salty snack foods?" Each item will be measured on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "Very unfavorably" (1) to "Very favorably" (5). Responses to these items will be averaged. Higher scores indicate more positive attitudes toward unhealthy food companies.

Time frame
At 0-months (baseline), 3-months (immediately post-intervention), and 9-months (6-months post-intervention)

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Stanford University

Lead sponsor

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)

Collaborator

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: