Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced External Counter-pulsation on Patients With Atopic Dermatitis and Inflammatory Skin Disease Requiring Wet Wrap Therapy

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-65
SponsorThe University of Hong Kong

About this trial

Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) and erythematous skin disease are often treated with topical treatment containing corticosteroids. However, long term use of topical corticosteroid is well known for its potential side-effects such as skin atrophy, hirsutism, dyspigmentation, telangiectasia, and possible skin infection and iatrogenic adrenal insufficiency. Fear about medication side effects would cause lack of adherence to treatment regiments and thus patients would seek for alternative therapies, and a long term safer and affordable treatment modality is required to fill this therapeutic gap.

Enhanced external counter-pulsation (EECP) therapy is a non-invasive method to improve perfusion of vital organs and reduces hypercholesterolemia-induced endothelial damage. It also helped to increase cerebral blood circulation in patients with ischemic stroke and improved neurological recovery.

This study aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of patients with atopic dermatitis and erythematous/ inflammatory skin diseases to receive EECP therapy combined treatment compared to wet wrap therapy alone.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients aged between 18 to 65 years old present with atopic dermatitis or erythematous / inflammatory skin diseases attending Queen Mary Hospital dermatology clinics requiring wet-wrap therapy (WWT) will be screened for recruitment by attending dermatologist(s)

Patients with AD having EASI>10 or erythematous/inflammatory skin disorder BSA>5%

Body weight ≥ 40kg at screening and baseline visit

Body height ≥ 150cm at screening and baseline visit

Disqualifiers

Patients who refuse to give consent

Females of childbearing potential who are pregnant or during breastfeeding period

Patients have newly started systemic corticosteroid, immunosuppressants or biologics within 6 week of Baseline (Day 0)

Patients who have unstable AD or inflammatory skin disease, active infection or contagious skin symptoms within 2 weeks before day 1 pre-enrolment

Trial design

Design model

Crossover

Treatments tested in this trial

  • wet wrap therapy

    Procedure/Surgery

    Steps for wet wrap therapy After bath/shower with emollients, pat to remove excess water on body and apply the emollient and/ or steroid cream liberally on the affected area to enhance water absorption and seal in moisture Put wet wrap garment in lukewarm water, squeeze water out of the wet wrap garment, take them out without dribbling of water and then apply on the affected area Put on another layer of dry garments/ warm clothing to cover the wet wrap garments and wear usual clothing as needed Check regularly and keep the wet wrap garments underneath damp with water sprayer or wet towel if necessary Patient is suggested to apply emollients frequently throughout the day to maintain the effect

  • External compression counter-pulsation (EECP)

    Device

    External compression counter-pulsation (EECP) is a compression/decompression non-invasive device (Stendo Pulsewave ® V3 CE certificate class IIa) used for lower part of the body (legs, thighs and buttock/hips) to reproduce and stimulate the natural physiological pulsations and the physical shear stress force.

Treatment groups

40 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: wet wrap therapy (WWT)Active comparator 2 interventions
Group B: EECP therapyActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

EECP therapy treatment should have more superior result compared to those receiving WWT alone

Patients with atopic dermatitis +/- erythematous/inflammatory skin disorders receiving EECP therapy treatment should have more mean reduction of total Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score from baseline to Day 7 compared to those receiving WWT alone. EASI score ranges from 0-72, and higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Time frame
Day 7

Secondary outcomes

1

achieve EASI 25%/ 50%/ 75% reduction on Day 7

1\. Percentage of participants who achieve EASI 25%/ 50%/ 75% reduction on Day 7 (after the first week of treatment)

Time frame
Day 7
2

second week of treatment and achieve EASI 25%/ 50%/ 75% reduction on Day 14

2\. Percentage of subjects who receive the second week of treatment and achieve EASI 25%/ 50%/ 75% reduction on Day 14 after the second week of treatment

Time frame
Day 14
3

at least 2 points decrease of itch score/sleep score decrease from Baseline visit

3\. Percentage of participants who have at least 2 points decrease of itch score/sleep score decrease from Baseline visit to Day 7 and or day 14 and 4 weeks- post treatment

Time frame
Day 7 and or Day 14
4

least 2-point vIGA/ PGA decrease from baseline

4\. Percentage of participants who receive the second week of treatment and achieve at least 2-point vIGA/ PGA decrease from baseline 50% reduction comparing to Day 14

Time frame
Day 14

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: