Evaluation of Success Rate of Partial Pulpotomy Versus Complete Pulpotomy in Primary Molars Using NeoPUTTY MTA

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age4-7
SponsorCairo University

About this trial

Evaluating the clinical and radiographic success of partial pulpotomy compared to complete pulpotomy in vital primary second molars with reversible pulpitis using NeoPUTTY™ (MTA).

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Aged 4-7 years, in good general health and medically within normal.

Restorable mandibular second primary molars.

History of reversible pulpitis.

Absence of periapical or inter-radicular radiolucency.

Disqualifiers

With systemic disorders.

Physical or mental disabilities.

Unable to attend follow-up visits.

Refusal of Participation.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Partial Pulpotomy

    Procedure/Surgery

    After removing caries high-speed handpiece with water coolant using a round diamond bur. Once there is an exposure, the bur is changed with another sterile one with which the superficially inflamed pulp tissue will be gently removed to a depth of 1-3 mm beneath the pinpoint pulp exposure that occurred at the end of caries removal. A sterile cotton pellet with saline will be placed with light pressure for 2-3 minutes to achieve hemostasis.

  • Complete pulpotomy

    Procedure/Surgery

    After removing caries with a large round bur, the access cavity will be opened. Excavation of inflamed coronal pulp tissues will be done using a sharp excavator. A sterile cotton pellet with saline will be placed with light pressure for 2-3 minutes to achieve hemostasis.

Treatment groups

60 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Partial PulpotomyExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Complete pulpotomyActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Postoperative pain

Postoperative pain assessment through Visual Analog Scale (the lower the value the better).

Time frame
one week postoperative
2

Swelling/ Fistula

Assessment of swelling and fistula through visual examination.

Time frame
3, 6, 9, 12 months
3

Mobility

Assesment of pathological mobility using mobility test.

Time frame
3, 6, 9, 12 months

Secondary outcomes

1

Radiographic success

Radiographic evaluation (Radiolucency at furcation or periapical, internal or external root resorption) through visual interpretation of digital radiograph at 0, 6 and 12 months postoperatively.

Time frame
0, 6, 12 months

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: