About this trial
\*\*Brief Summary\*\*
Lumbar radicular pain arising from intervertebral disc herniation is commonly managed with a caudal epidural steroid injection (CESI), a minimally invasive procedure that delivers anti-inflammatory medication to the sacral hiatus. Although CESI affords short-term analgesia, a sizable proportion of patients continue to experience pain-related disability and diminished quality of life, underscoring the need for optimised post-injection rehabilitation.
This single-centre, three-arm, parallel-group randomised controlled trial will evaluate the comparative efficacy of two evidence-informed exercise paradigms-moderate-intensity aerobic training and progressive lumbopelvic stabilisation-when each is superimposed upon a standard physiotherapy package of heat, therapeutic ultrasound and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). Forty-two adults (18-70 years) with MRI-confirmed lumbar disc herniation who have undergone CESI at Çankırı State Hospital will be randomly allocated (1:1:1) to one of the following six-week interventions, initiated two weeks post-injection and delivered thrice weekly under physiotherapist supervision:
1. Conventional physiotherapy alone (heat + ultrasound + TENS). 2. Conventional physiotherapy plus aerobic exercise (treadmill walking at 55-80 % of age-predicted maximal heart rate with structured warm-up/cool-down). 3. Conventional physiotherapy plus core-stabilisation exercise (phased activation of deep trunk musculature progressing to dynamic tasks on unstable surfaces).
Primary end-points are pain intensity (10 cm Visual Analogue Scale) and back-specific disability (Oswestry Disability Index). Secondary end-points include generic health-related quality of life (SF-12) and lumbar proprioceptive body awareness (Fremantle Back Awareness Questionnaire). Outcomes will be captured at baseline, post-intervention (6 weeks) and at 3- and 6-month follow-up to ascertain both immediate and sustained effects.
Study Question Does adjunctive aerobic or core-stabilisation exercise confer superior reductions in pain and disability, and greater gains in quality of life and body awareness, compared with conventional physiotherapy alone in adults following CESI for lumbar disc herniation?
It is hypothesised that both exercise approaches will yield clinically and statistically superior outcomes relative to standard care, with stabilisation training providing the most durable functional benefits. Findings are expected to refine post-CESI rehabilitation algorithms and inform evidence-based clinical guidance for physiotherapists managing lumbar disc pathology.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Age 18 to 70 years.
MRI-confirmed lumbar intervertebral disc herniation.
Has received a caudal epidural steroid injection (CESI) within the past 2 weeks at Çankırı State Hospital.
Low-back or leg pain intensity ≥ 3 cm on a 10-cm Visual Analogue Scale after the injection.
Disqualifiers
Uncontrolled systemic disease (e.g., poorly controlled diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, active hepatitis C or other significant liver disease).
Neurological red flags such as myelopathy or cauda equina syndrome.
Previous lumbar spine surgery at the affected disc level.
Current pregnancy or planning pregnancy during the study period.
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Conventional Physiotherapy
Other interventionStandard physical-agent package delivered three times weekly for 6 weeks: 20 min moist hot-pack (≈70 °C hydrocollator packs); 5 min continuous therapeutic ultrasound (1 MHz, 1 W cm-²); 20 min biphasic TENS (100 Hz, 100 µs). Initiated 2 weeks after the caudal epidural steroid injection (CESI).
Aerobic Exercise Programme
BehavioralSupervised treadmill walking three times weekly for 6 weeks: 5 min warm-up at \~40 % HR\<sub\>max\</sub\>; 10-25 min load at 55-80 % HR\<sub\>max\</sub\> (5 % weekly progression); 5 min cool-down. Heart-rate telemetry and Borg CR-10 used to titrate intensity. Starts 2 weeks post-CESI.
Core-Stabilization Exercise Programme
BehavioralPhased lumbopelvic motor-control regimen three times weekly for 6 weeks: Phase I isolated transversus abdominis/multifidus activation with pressure biofeedback; Phase II functional co-contraction with limb movements in quadruped, sitting, standing; Phase III dynamic tasks on Swiss-ball/BOSU with resistance. Progression requires pain ≤ 3/10 VAS and flawless technique. Begins 2 weeks post-CESI.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Change in Pain Intensity (Numeric Rating Scale, 0-10)
Unit of Measure: points on a 0-to-10 scale Description: 11-point Numeric Rating Scale; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain. Change from baseline will be calculated at each follow-up. Higher scores indicate worse pain.
Secondary outcomes
Change in Disability (Oswestry Disability Index, 0-100)
Unit of Measure: percentage points (0-100) Description: Oswestry Disability Index v2.1a; higher scores denote greater disability. Change from baseline will be reported.
Change in Health-Related Quality of Life (SF-12 Physical Component, 0-100)
Unit of Measure: points (0-100) Description: Short-Form-12 v2 Physical Component Summary (PCS); higher scores represent better quality of life.
Change in Health-Related Quality of Life (SF-12 Mental Component, 0-100)
Short-Form-12 v2. Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores; higher values = better QoL. Change from baseline calculated for each follow-up.
Change in Lumbar Body Awareness (Fremantle Back Awareness Questionnaire, 0-36)
Unit of Measure: points (0-36) Description: 9-item FreBAQ; higher scores reflect poorer body perception. Change from baseline reported.
Other outcomes
Adverse Events Related to Exercise or CESI
Unit of Measure: number of participants with ≥1 event Description: Musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, or injection-related adverse events, coded per CTCAE v5.0. Both incidence and narrative description will be provided.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.