Feasibility, Safety, Cost-effectiveness, and Environmental Impact of Reprocessed Ablation Catheters in PVI

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorUniversity Hospital Dubrava

About this trial

This study evaluates whether re-sterilized (reprocessed) ablation catheters are as effective and safe as new ablation catheters when used for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation. Adult patients scheduled for catheter ablation will be randomly assigned to undergo the procedure using either a new catheter or a re-sterilized catheter, with identical procedural techniques applied in both groups. The study will compare procedural efficiency, safety, costs, and environmental impact between the two approaches. The results may support more sustainable and cost-effective use of medical devices in cardiac electrophysiology.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age ≥ 18 years

Paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation documented by ECG or Holter ECG monitoring

Indication for pulmonary vein isolation according to current clinical guidelines

Written informed consent

Disqualifiers

Severe valvular heart disease

Significant structural heart disease that precludes pulsed field ablation (PFA)

Pregnancy or breastfeeding

Life expectancy < 12 months

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Participants will undergo pulmonary vein isolation using pulsed field ablation (PFA). The intervention consists of the use of either a reprocessed electroporation ablation catheter or a new electropor

    Procedure/Surgery

    This intervention involves pulmonary vein isolation performed with ablation catheter that is either new or reprocessed. The reprocessed catheter has undergone validated cleaning, resterilization, and functional testing in accordance with regulatory and safety standards prior to reuse. The key distinguishing feature of this intervention is the comparison of reprocessed versus new single-use catheters, while all other procedural aspects, including operator technique, energy delivery protocol, and peri-procedural care, are standardized and identical between groups.

Treatment groups

200 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Reprocessed Catheter (Experimental)Experimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: New Catheter (Active Comparator)Active comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Pulmonary Vein Isolation Procedure Duration

Procedure duration, expressed in minutes, measured from transseptal puncture to completion of ablation of all pulmonary veins. Additional procedural parameters, including duration of individual procedural segments, total ablation time, number and duration of energy applications, and other time-related procedural characteristics, will also be recorded.

Time frame
From the start of the index ablation procedure until its completion.

Secondary outcomes

1

Procedural Catheter Performance Parameters

Catheter functional performance assessed by successful pulmonary vein isolation, number of energy applications per pulmonary vein, total ablation time, and procedural assessment of catheter integrity and flexibility.

Time frame
From the start of the index ablation procedure until its completion
2

Medical Waste Generated Per Procedure

Amount of medical waste generated per ablation procedure, expressed in kilograms.

Time frame
Periprocedural
3

Fluoroscopy Time

Total fluoroscopy time, expressed in minutes, recorded during the ablation procedure.

Time frame
From the start of the index ablation procedure until its completion
4

Radiation Dose (Dose-Area Product)

Radiation exposure expressed as dose-area product (DAP), automatically recorded during the ablation procedure.

Time frame
From the start of the index ablation procedure until its completion

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.