Guiding Opioid Administration by Nociception Level Index (NOL) in Patients With Regional Anesthesia

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorUniversitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

About this trial

General anesthesia consists of a combination of hypnotic drugs to achieve unconsciousness and opioid analgesics to ensure antinociception. An alternative approach to the intraoperative administration of high-potency opioids to achieve antinociception during surgery is combining general anesthesia with regional anesthesia. Modern general anesthesia aims to avoid an overdose of opioid analgesics and reduce side effects of opioid administration. Quality and safety of general anesthesia are of major clinical importance and can be improved by adjusting the opioid analgesics to the optimal individual dose needed.

In current clinical practice, opioid dosage is usually determined by clinical judgment. However, different monitoring devices estimating the effect of nociception during unconsciousness have become commercially available. One of the most recent commercially available nociception indices is the Nociception Level Index (NOL). Until today, there is conflicting evidence on whether guiding sufentanil administration by NOL monitoring, which is the intended use of the nociception index, affects postoperative pain level in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), the amount of postoperatively administered opioids, and the quality of postoperative recovery in patients with a combination of general and regional anesthesia. This study aims to investigate the clinical performance of intraoperative NOL monitoring and determine whether guiding sufentanil administration by NOL monitoring - compared to routine care - reduces either postoperative pain level in the PACU, postoperative opioid consumption in the PACU or postoperative opioid consumption in the first 24 hours after the operation in patients having trauma and orthopedic surgery with combined general and regional anesthesia.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

None

Disqualifiers

Preexisting therapy with cardiac glycosides or pacemakers

Cardiac arrhythmia (atrial fibrillation, atrioventricular block > I°)

Chronic opioid misuse

Intraoperative treatment with ketamine, beta-adrenergic agonists, or clonidine

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • NOL (Nociception Level Index)

    Procedure/Surgery

    Elective surgery in patients having trauma and orthopedic surgery with a combination of general and regional anesthesia. Opioid titration is guided by NOL during general anesthesia in the experimental arm.

  • Control (Standard treatment)

    Other intervention

    Opioid administration (sufentanil) guided according to standard clinical practice of the attending anesthesiologist

Treatment groups

240 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: NOL (Nociception Level Index)Experimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: ControlActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Postoperative pain level in the PACU

Compares the proportion of postoperative pain level (NRS=0 vs. NRS\>0) in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) between the groups.

Time frame
1 day
2

Postoperative administration of opioids during the PACU stay

Compares the proportion of postoperative administration of opioids during the PACU stay (none vs. any) between the groups.

Time frame
1 day
3

Postoperative administration of opioids in the first 24 hours after the operation

Compares the proportion of postoperative administration of opioids in the first 24 hours after the operation (none vs. any) between the groups.

Time frame
2 days

Secondary outcomes

1

Intraoperative sufentanil consumption

Compares intraoperative sufentanil consumption \[μg/kg/min\] between the groups.

Time frame
1 day
2

Intraoperative norepinephrine consumption

Compares intraoperative cumulative dose of norepinephrine consumption \[μg/kg/min\] between the groups.

Time frame
1 day
3

Time to extubation

Compares the time from end of narcotics to extubation \[min\] between the groups.

Time frame
1 day
4

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV)

Compares the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (%) between the groups.

Time frame
1 day

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.