Anesthesia Recovery Period

This study aims to determine whether heated and humidified oxygen therapy, compared with conventional room-temperature oxygen therapy, reduces the incidence of early hypoxemia in adult patients recovering from general anesthesia in the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU). Hypoxemia is a common and potentially life-threatening complication during PACU recovery, resulting from residual anesthetics, decreased upper airway muscle tone, atelectasis, and suppression of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (HPV). Heated and humidified oxygen may offer benefits by preserving optimal HPV function, protecting airway mucosa, and reducing respiratory resistance. This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, superiority trial with a parallel-group design. A total of 2,000 adult patients (ASA class I-III) undergoing general anesthesia will be enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either heated and humidified oxygen (37°C, 5 L/min via face mask) or room-temperature oxygen (room temperature, 5 L/min via face mask). The primary outcome is the incidence of hypoxemia, defined as SpO₂ ≤ 90% lasting ≥ 5 seconds, within 10 minutes after initiation of the intervention. Secondary outcomes include severe hypoxemia (SpO₂ ≤ 85%), requirement for airway interventions, lowest SpO₂ value, PACU length of stay, postoperative shivering, and agitation. Safety outcomes include nasal discomfort, epistaxis, and device-related adverse events.

This study aims to evaluate the impact of different extubation strategy on the occupancy time of operating room (OR) and the incidence of adverse events and quality of recovery after robotic-assisted surgery. The investigators hypothesize that extubation in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) may reduce OR occupancy time without increasing adverse events or worsening quality of recovery early after robotic-assisted surgery. This strategy may enhance perioperative efficiency while maintaining clinical safety.

General anesthesia consists of a combination of hypnotic drugs to achieve unconsciousness and opioid analgesics to ensure antinociception. An alternative approach to the intraoperative administration of high-potency opioids to achieve antinociception during surgery is combining general anesthesia with regional anesthesia. Modern general anesthesia aims to avoid an overdose of opioid analgesics and reduce side effects of opioid administration. Quality and safety of general anesthesia are of major clinical importance and can be improved by adjusting the opioid analgesics to the optimal individual dose needed. In current clinical practice, opioid dosage is usually determined by clinical judgment. However, different monitoring devices estimating the effect of nociception during unconsciousness have become commercially available. One of the most recent commercially available nociception indices is the Nociception Level Index (NOL). Until today, there is conflicting evidence on whether guiding sufentanil administration by NOL monitoring, which is the intended use of the nociception index, affects postoperative pain level in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), the amount of postoperatively administered opioids, and the quality of postoperative recovery in patients with a combination of general and regional anesthesia. This study aims to investigate the clinical performance of intraoperative NOL monitoring and determine whether guiding sufentanil administration by NOL monitoring - compared to routine care - reduces either postoperative pain level in the PACU, postoperative opioid consumption in the PACU or postoperative opioid consumption in the first 24 hours after the operation in patients having trauma and orthopedic surgery with combined general and regional anesthesia.

Aim of the Work The investigators aim to compare lidocaine-based anesthesia versus conventional anesthesia in the presence of multimodal analgesia protocol in terms of early quality of recovery and analgesic efficacy. Objectives To compare quality of recovery using the Quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) score between lidocaine-based anesthesia in relation to conventional anesthesia in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. Hypothesis the investigators hypothesize that lidocaine-based regimen would be effective in reducing opioid use and provide superior quality of recovery compared to conventional opioid-routine anesthesia in emergency laparotomy.