About this trial
This study aims to compare the wound healing efficacy and postoperative experiences between the 940 nm diode laser technique and the traditional electrosurgery method for treating ankyloglossia (tongue-tie) in children aged 3 to 6 years.
Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups: Experimental Group - Patients undergo lingual frenectomy using a 940 nm diode laser and Active Comparator Group - Patients undergo the procedure using conventional high-frequency electrosurgery.
The study evaluates several key outcomes at multiple intervals (24 hours, 3 days, 1 week, and 1 month post-surgery), including: (1) Wound Healing: Measured by the Early Wound Healing Score (EHS); (2) Pain Levels: Assessed using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale; (3) Bleeding Control: Evaluation of intraoperative bleeding; (4) Tongue Mobility: Measurement of free tongue length according to Kotlow's classification.
The goal is to determine if the diode laser provides superior healing, less pain, and better bleeding control compared to electrosurgery.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Patients aged between 3 and 6 years.
Diagnosed with grade 3 or grade 4 ankyloglossia according to Kotlow's classification (1999).
Parents or legal guardians provide informed consent for the child to participate in the study.
Patients and guardians agree to follow the follow-up schedule (24 hours, 3 days, 1 week, and 1 month post-surgery).
Disqualifiers
History of allergy to local anesthetics (e.g., Lidocaine, Adrenaline).
Patients with systemic diseases or high-risk surgical factors (e.g., cardiovascular disease, bleeding disorders, hemophilia, epilepsy, or uncontrolled asthma).
Uncooperative patients who are unable to undergo the procedure under local anesthesia or fail to follow post-operative instructions.
Patients who withdraw from the study before completion.
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Lingual Frenectomy using 940nm Diode Laser
Procedure/SurgeryLingual frenectomy performed using a 940 nm Diode Laser (Epic X, Biolase). The laser is set to pulsed mode (CP2), average power 1W, and peak power 2W. The procedure involves a transverse incision to release the frenum without suturing. Protective eyewear is mandatory for the patient and surgical team.
Lingual Frenectomy using High-frequency Electrosurgery
Procedure/SurgeryLingual frenectomy performed using a high-frequency electrosurgical unit (ERBE-VIO 100C). The procedure follows a standardized transverse incision protocol without suturing. A grounding pad (electrode) is applied to the patient's body to complete the circuit. This serves as the active comparator representing the conventional surgical method at the hospital.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Early Wound Healing Score (EHS)
The EHS is used to evaluate the early healing of periodontal soft tissue wounds. It is the sum of three components: Clinical Signs of Re-epithelialization (CSR), Clinical Signs of Haemostasis (CSH), and Clinical Signs of Inflammation (CSI). The total score ranges from 0 to 10, where a higher score indicates better and faster wound healing (10 being perfect healing).
Secondary outcomes
Pain Intensity assessed by Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale
Patients self-assess their pain levels using a scale of 6 faces representing different pain intensities. Scores range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), with increments of 2 (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10).
Level of Intraoperative Bleeding
Bleeding is assessed during the surgical procedure and categorized into 2 levels: Grade 1 (No bleeding) and Grade 2 (Bleeding present, requiring local haemostatic measures like gauze pressure or laser/electrosurgery coagulation).
Increase in Free Tongue Length
Measured as the distance (in mm) from the attachment of the lingual frenum on the ventral surface of the tongue to the tip of the tongue using a Quick Tongue-Tie (QTT) measurement tool.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.