Isometric Strengthening Exercises Versus Tens in Diabetic Population

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age40-65
SponsorKafrelsheikh University

About this trial

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of Isometric Strengthening Exercises versus Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in the management of shoulder pain among individuals with diabetes mellitus.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age between 40-65 years, diagnosed as type 2 diabetes mellitus for at least 5 years

Clinical diagnosis of unilateral frozen shoulder in the painful or stiff stage.

Limitation of passive and active range of motion in external rotation, abduction, and flexion.

Shoulder pain for at least 3 months.

Disqualifiers

Previous shoulder surgery or fracture.

Cervical radiculopathy or neurological disorders.

Rheumatoid arthritis or severe osteoarthritis.

Cardiac pacemaker.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Isometric exercise

    Other intervention

    Isometric shoulder exercises include flexion, extension, abduction, internal and external rotation. The protocol involves holding each position for 10 seconds, resting for 5 seconds, and performing 10 repetitions in 3 sessions per week over 6 weeks. Each exercise begins from a standing position with the elbow bent at 90 degrees and a towel used for support against a wall or door frame, ensuring minimal movement and maintaining good posture throughout.

  • Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation

    Other intervention

    Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation Application Parameters: * Frequency: 80-100 Hertz * Pulse duration: 100-150 microseconds * Duration: 30 minutes * 3 sessions/week for 6 weeks Electrodes placed over the anterior and posterior shoulder.

  • The conventional exercise program

    Other intervention

    1. Ultrasound Therapy: Administered at 3 MHz and 1.4 W/cm² for 5 minutes to improve shoulder tissue extensibility and blood circulation before exercises. 2. Codman's Pendular Exercises: Gentle passive mobilization of the glenohumeral joint is performed by allowing the affected arm to hang, aiming to reduce stiffness and pain. 3. Range of motion Exercises: Conducted within a pain-free range, progressively increasing intensity to encourage compliance. 4. Finger Ladder Exercise: Active-assisted technique for shoulder elevation, involving walking fingers up a wall. 5. Shoulder Joint Stretching Exercises: Targeting capsular tightness to improve flexibility and range of motion. Each exercise is performed in three sets of five repetitions, at least twice daily.

Treatment groups

75 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups
Group A: Isometric Exercise groupExperimental treatment 2 interventions
Group B: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation groupExperimental treatment 2 interventions
Group C: conventional physical therapy groupActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Assessment of shoulder range of motion

Shoulder range of motion (ROM) for flexion, abduction, and external rotation was measured using an electrogoniometer. Participants were positioned according to standardized measurement procedures, and each movement was assessed within the participant's pain-free range. Three consecutive measurements were obtained for each motion, and the average value was recorded in degrees (°) for statistical analysis to improve measurement reliability.

Time frame
At baseline and after 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes

1

assessment of pain intensity

In visual analogue scale assessment, patients were asked to place a vertical mark along a horizontal line to indicate their current degree of pain at rest and during activity, where 0 indicated 'no pain' and 100 indicated 'worst pain'.

Time frame
At baseline and after 6 weeks
2

assessment of activity of daily living of the upper limb

The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire is an outcome measure designed to evaluate upper extremity functionality in daily activities, applicable to various musculoskeletal pathologies. Comprising 30 items, it measures disability and symptoms by assessing difficulties faced in physical, social, and work-related tasks, as well as their effects on sleep and self-perception regarding upper extremity issues. Patients respond using a five-point Likert scale, with scores from 1 (no difficulty) to 5 (unable to perform activity). The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 100 (severest disability), and a score cannot be computed if more than three items are missing.

Time frame
At baseline and after 6 weeks

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.