iWAIST Trial: ERCG (Endoscopic Radial Compression Gastroplasty) vs Optimized Lifestyle Intervention for Weight Loss

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-65
SponsorLiu Yan

About this trial

Obesity and overweight are rising in Chinese populations, where metabolic risks begin at lower BMI thresholds than in Western cohorts. Many individuals with overweight or mild-to-moderate obesity are ineligible or unwilling to undergo bariatric surgery due to invasiveness and risk. Endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies offer minimally invasive alternatives but vary in complexity, cost, and safety profiles. Investigators developed a sutureless endoscopic procedure, Endoscopic Radial Compression Gastroplasty (ERCG), which reduces gastric volume by apposing gastric walls using a clip-and-loop system. This randomized controlled trial evaluates the efficacy and safety of ERCG versus an optimized lifestyle intervention in Asian adults with BMI 24.0-37.4 kg/m² who have not succeeded with conservative measures. Preliminary studies suggest ERCG can achieve approximately 12% total body weight loss (TBWL) at 3 months. The primary endpoint is percent TBWL at 3 months; secondary outcomes include changes in BMI, metabolic parameters, quality of life, and adverse events. Results are expected to inform the role of ERCG as a safe, effective, and scalable option between conservative care and bariatric surgery.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Asian adults aged 18-65 years.

BMI 24.0-37.4kg/m²(Chinese standard)。

Failed prior conservative weight loss attempts ≥2 months。

Willingness to comply with follow-up.

Disqualifiers

Prior gastrointestinal surgery with clinically relevant sequelae.

Active or clinically significant gastrointestinal disease, including inflammatory conditions (e.g., esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus, Crohn's disease), peptic ulcer disease (gastric/duodenal ulcer), or neoplastic lesions.

Any condition associated with an increased risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Hiatal hernia >2 cm or severe/refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); acid reflux requiring ≥2 medications for symptom control.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Endoscopic Radial Compression Gastroplasty

    Procedure/Surgery

    Sutureless endoscopic gastric volume reduction using a novel clip-and-endoloop apposition system; performed under general anesthesia or deep sedation; standard perioperative care.

  • Optimized Lifestyle Intervention (OLI)

    Behavioral

    Structured nutrition counseling, calorie deficit plan, physical activity prescription per regional guidelines, and behavioral support; visit frequency matched to the ERCG arm.

Treatment groups

216 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: ERCG + OLIExperimental treatment 2 interventions
Group B: OLIActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Percent Total Body Weight Loss (%TBWL)

%TBWL = \[(Baseline weight - Follow-up weight) / Baseline weight\] × 100. Measured using calibrated scale under standardized conditions.

Time frame
1-6 months post-intervention
2

Clinical Responder Rate (CRR)

Percentage of participants with %TBWL \> 5% at 3/6 months, where %TBWL = \[(baseline weight - month 3/6 weight) / baseline weight\] × 100.

Time frame
3 month, 6 month

Secondary outcomes

1

Body Weight (kg)

Weight measured on a calibrated scale under standardized conditions (light clothing, no shoes, preferably morning after ≥8h fasting).

Time frame
Baseline, 1 month, 2 month, 3 month, 6month
2

Body Height (m)

Standing height measured with a wall-mounted stadiometer, no shoes, heels together, Frankfurt plane horizontal.

Time frame
Baseline
3

Percent Excess Body Weight Loss (%EBWL)

%EBWL is calculated as \[(Baseline weight - Follow-up weight) / (Baseline weight - Ideal weight)\] × 100. Ideal weight is defined as the weight corresponding to a BMI of 23.9 kg/m². Weight is measured using a calibrated scale under standardized fasting conditions at each visit.

Time frame
1-6 months post-intervention
4

Change in BMI (kg/m²)

BMI will be calculated as weight (kg) divided by height squared (m²).

Time frame
Baseling, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months and 6 months

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Liu Yan

Lead sponsor

Beijing 302 Hospital

Sponsor institution

Wuhan TongJi Hospital

Collaborator

The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University

Collaborator

Ankang City Central Hospital

Collaborator

The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University

Collaborator

LanZhou University

Collaborator