L-PRF vs Connective Tissue With Customized Healing Abutment in Immediate Implant Placement
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age21-45
SponsorKafrelsheikh University
About this trial
comparison between L-prf and connective tissue with dental implant
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
Intact labial/buccal bone plate
The presence of non-restorable single-rooted maxillary centrals, canines or premolars.
Sufficient bone volume.
Good oral hygiene.
Disqualifiers
Insufficient bone volume.
Active infection.
Patients on chemotherapy or radiotherapy.
Patients who have systemic disorders {uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, autoimmune disease, …etc},
Trial design
Design model
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
L-PRF with dental implant and customized healing abutment
Procedure/SurgeryL-PRF with dental implant and customized healing abutment
Connective tissue with dental implant and customized healing abutment
Procedure/SurgeryConnective tissue with dental implant and customized healing abutment
Treatment groups
16 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groupsGroup A: Connective tissue with dental implant and customized healing abutmentActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: L-PRF with dental implant and customized healing abutmentExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
1
Patient-reported pain experience
Pain experience after surgery is daily measured by the patients using a visual analogue scale (VAS) in the first postoperative 7 days, with Day 0 being the day of the surgery. Before going to sleep, patients will be asked to mark the VAS that best represented the average pain they had experienced during the day.
Time frame
first 7 days after surgery2
Pink aesthetic score
Parameters are : 0,1 and 2. Mesial papilla : 0 ( Missing ) , 1 ( Incomplete ) and 2 ( Complete ). Distal Papilla : 0 ( Missing ) , 1 ( Incomplete ) and 2 ( Complete ). Tissue contour : 0 ( Unnatural) , 1 ( virtually natural ) and 2 ( natural). Gingival level : 0 ( \>2mm) , 1 ( 1-2mm ) and 2 ( 1 mm). Alveolar process : 0 ( clearly resorbed ) , 1 ( slightly resorbed ) and 2 ( no difference). Coloring : 0 ( clear difference ) , 1 ( slight difference ) and 2 ( no difference). Texture : 0 ( clear difference ) , 1 ( slight difference ) and 2 ( no difference).
Time frame
before surgery, 3 months and 6 months after surgery3
crestal bone loss
distance from implant shoulder to marginal bone
Time frame
preoperative and 6 months post operativeSecondary outcomes
1
Gingival thickness
1 mm apical to gingival margin in mid buccal
Time frame
pre opearative, 3 and 6 months post operative2
probing pocket depth
mid buccal , mesio buccal , disto buccal and mid palatal
Time frame
preoperative , 3 and 6 months post operative3
keratinized tissue width
in mid buccal, from gingival margin to mucogingival junction
Time frame
preoperative , 3 and 6 months post operativeSponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Source ClinicalTrials.gov