Let's Get REAL: Family Health Communication Tool in Pediatric Stem Cell Transplant and Cellular Therapy

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age8+
SponsorWashington University School of Medicine

About this trial

The investigators will conduct a pilot feasibility and efficacy trial of a newly developed family health communication tool (called Let's Get REAL) in increasing youth involvement in real-time stem cell transplant and cellular therapy decisions (SCTCT). The investigators will pilot the intervention among 24 youth and their parents, stratified by youth age (stratum 1, 8-12 years of age and stratum 2, 13-17 years of age).

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Children or adolescents 8-17 years of age referred for SCTCT.

Diagnosis of malignant or nonmalignant disorder.

Referred for any type of SCTCT. Autologous and allogeneic stem cell and cellular therapies are eligible.

Planning to meet with a provider to discuss SCTCT.

Disqualifiers

Active medical problems severe enough to preclude study participation at the time of recruitment.

Patients who are otherwise eligible, but whose primary transplant physician does not want them to participate in the study.

Lacks cognitive capacity to complete study activities, as determined by consenting professional.

Their youth referred for SCTCT does not assent to participate.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Let's Get REAL

    Behavioral

    Family health communication tool

Treatment groups

60 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups
Group A: Let's Get REAL family health communication tool: Patients (8-12 years of age)Experimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Let's Get REAL family health communication tool: Patients (13-17 years of age)Experimental treatment 1 intervention
Group C: Let's Get REAL family health communication tool: ParentsExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Feasibility of intervention as measured by the Feasibility of Intervention questionnaire

This is a 4-item scale that youth and their parents report feasibility of the intervention on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 'Completely disagree' to Completely agree'. A higher score indicates greater feasibility.

Time frame
Up to 4 weeks after SCTCT consultation (estimated to be week 8)
2

Acceptability of intervention as measured by the Acceptability of Intervention questionnaire

This is a 4-item scale that youth and their parents report acceptability of the intervention on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 'Completely disagree' to Completely agree'. A higher score indicates greater acceptability.

Time frame
Up to 4 weeks after SCTCT consultation (estimated to be week 8)
3

Appropriateness of intervention as measured by the Intervention of Appropriateness questionnaire

This is a 4-item scale that youth and their parents report appropriateness of the intervention on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 'Completely disagree' to Completely agree'. A higher score indicates greater appropriateness.

Time frame
Up to 4 weeks after SCTCT consultation (estimated to be week 8)
4

Feasibility of intervention as measured qualitatively

Content analysis of open-ended survey responses and quotations from individual interviews. Will be collecting number of feasibility content codes.

Time frame
Up to 8 weeks after SCTCT consultation (estimated to be week 16)

Secondary outcomes

1

Difference in feasibility scores in those 8-12 years of age and those 13-17 years of age as measured by the Feasibility of Intervention questionnaire

This is a 4-item scale that youth and their parents report feasibility of the intervention on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 'Completely disagree' to Completely agree'. A higher score indicates greater feasibility.

Time frame
Up to 4 weeks after SCTCT consultation (estimated to be week 8)
2

Difference in acceptability scores in those 8-12 years of age and those 13-17 years of age as measured by the Acceptability of Intervention questionnaire

This is a 4-item scale that youth and their parents report acceptability of the intervention on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 'Completely disagree' to Completely agree'. A higher score indicates greater acceptability.

Time frame
Up to 4 weeks after SCTCT consultation (estimated to be week 8)
3

Difference in appropriateness scores in those 8-12 years of age and those 13-17 years of age as measured by the Intervention of Appropriateness questionnaire

This is a 4-item scale that youth and their parents report appropriateness of the intervention on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 'Completely disagree' to Completely agree'. A higher score indicates greater appropriateness.

Time frame
Up to 4 weeks after SCTCT consultation (estimated to be week 8)
4

Perceived levels of decision-making involvement in youth 8-17 years of age and their parents as measured by the Decision Making Involvement Scale

This is a 30-item scale that youth and their parents report youth involvement behaviors in a decision related to their illness on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 'A Little Bit' to 'A Lot'. The higher the subscale score (child seek, child express, parent seek, parent express, and joint/options), the more that behavior or type of involvement occurred in the decision making process.

Time frame
Up to 4 weeks after SCTCT consultation (estimated to be week 8)

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Washington University School of Medicine

Lead sponsor

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Collaborator

St. Louis Children's Hospital Foundation

Collaborator