Long-term Outcomes After Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure (Severance PFO Registry)

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age19+
SponsorYonsei University

About this trial

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a congenital interatrial communication present in about one quarter of the general population and is recognized as a major cause of cryptogenic stroke. Percutaneous PFO closure reduces recurrent stroke, but a residual right-to-left shunt persists in 20 to 40 percent of patients after device implantation. Long-term data on device performance, the evolution of residual shunt over time, new-onset atrial fibrillation and other prognostic factors remain limited.

This single-center registry evaluates the long-term efficacy and safety of percutaneous PFO closure and identifies the clinical, anatomical, procedural and pharmacological factors associated with clinical and echocardiographic outcomes. The registry combines a retrospective cohort of patients treated at Severance Hospital between 2010 and March 2026 with a prospective registry extension that enrolls patients undergoing PFO closure after institutional review board approval, with follow-up for up to 119 months.

Clinical outcomes include recurrent ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack, all-cause death, device-related complications and new-onset atrial fibrillation. Echocardiographic outcomes are assessed by serial agitated saline transthoracic echocardiography, which allows the presence, grade and longitudinal trajectory of residual shunt to be characterized.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Age 19 years or older

Percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure

Retrospective cohort: closure performed between 2010 and March 2026, with at least one post-procedural agitated saline transthoracic echocardiography

Prospective cohort: closure performed after institutional review board approval, with written informed consent

Disqualifiers

Atrial septal defect closure (defect other than patent foramen ovale)

Device embolization or device removal

Echocardiographic image quality inadequate for assessment of shunt

Prospective cohort: refusal of informed consent

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Not listed

Trial groups

400 Participants
are grouped into 2 trial groups

Sponsors and collaborators