Atrial Fibrillation

This is a multi-national, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the effects of etripamil NS in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This study includes Screening Visit, Randomization Visit, a Treatment Period with scheduled Follow-up Visits (Monthly Follow-up and Post-treatment Follow-up Visits), a Final Study Visit, and an End of Study Telephone Follow up Visit. Each patient will be randomized 1:1 to receive placebo or 70 mg Etripamil NS regimens. Patients will self-administer study drug for a perceived episode of AF with RVR with an initial dose of placebo or 70 mg etripamil NS, followed by an optional second dose of the same study drug 10 minutes after the first dose if the patient continues to experience symptoms. Patients may treat up to a maximum of 4 episodes in the study. Informed consent will be obtained prior to any study procedures.

The main goal of this study is to find out how well BAY 3670549 works, how safe it is, how well people can tolerate it, and how the body handles the medicine. The study will compare BAY 3670549 to a placebo (a dummy treatment with no active medicine) in people with AF who need a treatment called electrical cardioversion. Electrical cardioversion is a procedure that helps the heart return to a normal rhythm. In this study, each participant will get a single intravenous (IV) infusion of either BAY 3670549 or a placebo. Participants will then be observed to see whether the heart rhythm returns to a normal rhythm. If it does not, electrical cardioversion can still be performed as planned. The study will look at how many participants return from AF to a normal rhythm, without needing electrical cardioversion and how long it takes. It will also show how many participants experience medical problems after treatment and how BAY 3670549 move into, through and out of the participants' body. The total duration of the study for an individual participant may be up two months. The findings from this study may contribute to the development of a new treatment option for people with AF.

This study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, blinded end-point, controlled clinical trial to investigate the impact of first line pulsed field ablation during 12 months follow-up in patients with early-stage paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (\<3 years) compared to usual care, defined as OMT.

The primary objective is to determine whether a telemedicine-supported, village doctor-led integrated management model, AF-HF comorbidity ABC pathway and enhanced patient education, improves clinical outcomes compared with usual care among rural residents aged 65-80 years with AF and HF. The trial will evaluate whether integrated management reduces the MAGGIC HF risk score at 12 months (phase 1) and whether it reduces a composite cardiovascular endpoint, including cardiovascular death, ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, hospitalization for worsening heart failure or acute coronary syndrome, and emergency visits due to atrial fibrillation over 36 months (phase 2). An extended observational follow-up, the composite cardiovascular endpoint observational follow-up study, will be conducted at Year 6 to evaluate long-term effects.

This cluster randomized study aims to compare village doctor-led integrated care versus usual care to improve cardiovascular health, atrial fibrillation management, self-management adherence, and heart failure prevention among older rural patients with atrial fibrillation in China.The primary outcome at 12 months is the change in Life's Essential 8 cardiovascular health score from baseline (phase 1). The primary outcome at 36 months is a composite cardiovascular endpoint including cardiovascular death, ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, hospitalization for worsening HF or acute coronary syndrome, and emergency department visits due to AF (phase 2) . The primary outcome at 48 months is new-incident heart-failure diagnosis (phase 3) .An extended observational follow-up, the new-incident heart-failure diagnosis observational follow-up study, will be conducted at Year 7 to evaluate long-term effects.

SAFE is an international multicentre RCT of concomitant surgical atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation in patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF undergoing cardiac surgery.

Pulmonary vein isolation is an established intervention for atrial fibrillation. Patients with a paroxysmal atrial fibrillation have no or only few comorbidities and a good prognosis in respect to their atrial fibrillation. In contrast, patients with persistent atrial fibrillation often suffer from relevant comorbidities and recurrence of atrial fibrillation is common. Left-atrial fibrosis and its electrophysiological consequences are involved in the recurrence rate, but pathophysiological mechanisms are yet to be better characterized. The study investigates relevant comorbidities to elucidated their effect on atrial fibrosis and recurrence rates of atrial fibrillation. Furthermore, the investigators evaluate the prevalence of these comorbidities.

VIBRANT-AF seeks to: * Identify clinically relevant predictors of effectiveness and complications of AF ablation procedures in a prospective, US-based, multi-center, real-world longitudinal study * Assess changes in modifiable lifestyle-related exposures influence the effectiveness of AF ablation * Determine incidence and predictors of complications of AF ablation procedures Participants will connect with the Eureka Research Platform and answer a series of surveys and activities over a one-year period. They will be asked about lifestyle habits, recurrence of AFib, hospitalizations, and general feelings and emotions.

Atrial Fibrillation (AF) affects 200,000 Canadians and increases risk of stroke, morbidity and mortality. Having a stroke can affect a patient's ability to speak, eat, walk, work, care for themselves, and interact with others. Not only can it ruin one's life, but it can also be fatal. A stroke occurs when blood flow to the brain is blocked by a clot, depriving brain cells of oxygen. In people with atrial fibrillation, blood flow is sluggish in the top chambers of the heart, and blood clots can form there. When a piece of a clot breaks off, it can travel to the brain and cause a stroke. That's where blood thinners come in. Blood thinners, or anticoagulants, decrease the chances of blood clots forming in the heart, reducing the risk of stroke. Studies show that blood thinners are highly effective at reducing the risk of stroke by up to 95%. The conventional blood thinner is warfarin, taken by mouth. Warfarin requires regular blood tests to make sure a patient getting the correct dose. The patient also may have to avoid certain foods since the medication can interact with them. Newer blood thinners, known as direct-oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are available, which do not require regular blood tests and do not interact with foods. Two of the new blood thinners are called rivaroxaban and apixaban. Like warfarin, they can be taken by mouth, and studies have shown them to be as effective as warfarin. Both rivaroxaban and apixaban have been approved for stroke prevention in AF by Health Canada. However, there have been no direct head-to-head comparisons of these two anticoagulants, meaning comparative safety data is not available. Increasing use of DOACs for stroke prevention in AF and patient values around bleeding highlight the need for a comparison trial to ensure patients receive the anticoagulant with the greatest balance of benefit to potential harm. The trial is to assess bleeding rates and superiority of using apixaban versus rivaroxaban in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

The clinical equipoise in the treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (AF) in patients with Heart Failure with mildly reduced Ejection Fraction/Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFmrEF/HFpEF) reflects the scarcity of randomized trials on different treatment modalities. By generating high-quality, evidence-based, randomized data on the impact of treatment on hard outcomes, Catheter Ablation Versus Standard Conventional Treatment in Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (CASTLE-HFpEF) will provide clinical decision-making guidance and help physicians in the management of patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF and AF. The main hypothesis is that Catheter Ablation (CA) for AF is associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF and AF compared to medical AF treatment strategies on top of optimal medical HF treatment. CASTLE-HFpEF aims to study these hard clinical outcomes in a randomized cohort of patients with AF and HFmrEF/HFpEF.

REACT-AF is a multicenter prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint (PROBE design), controlled trial comparing the current Standard Of Care (SOC) of continuous Direct Oral Anticoagulation (DOAC) use versus time-delimited (1 month) DOAC guided by an AF-sensing Smart Watch (AFSW) in participants with a history of paroxysmal or persistent Atrial Fibrillation (AF) and low-to-moderate stroke risk.

This study will include the subjects who enrolled in pCAD-POAF trial (NCT05009914) to observe clinical outcomes 3 years after surgery. The primary outcome is the time to first occurrence of a composite of all-cause death, stroke, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, unplanned cardiac rehospitalization, or post-discharge atrial fibrillation from randomization through 3 years after surgery. The secondary outcomes are：the individual components of the primary composite outcome; unplanned all-cause rehospitalization; arrhythmias other than atrial fibrillation; premature atrial contraction and premature ventricular contraction burdens; heart rate variability parameters; quality-of-life scores; and other Holter-derived parameters.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term safety and effectiveness of the FDA approved VARIPULSE catheter system for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in the treatment of participants with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF).

A randomized, placebo-controlled, participant-and investigator-blinded study to evaluate the efficacy in reducing atrial fibrillation burden as well as the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of PKN605 in participants with atrial fibrillation

The purpose of this study is to assess how safe VARIPULSE catheter system is for treatment of a heart rhythm disease called persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF) in participants who are having a catheter ablation procedure (treat heart rhythm disease). This includes isolation of pulmonary vein and superior vena cava (heart veins; pulmonary vein isolation \[PVI\] and superior vena cava isolation \[SVCI\]), with or without another technique called posterior wall isolation (PWI). Also, to assess how safe it is for participants who are having a catheter ablation procedure and at the same time receiving another procedure called left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO; to reduce stroke risk). Additionally, to assess how well VARIPULSE catheter system works over a long period of time for treatment of PsAF in participants undergoing catheter ablation for PVI, SVCI and SVCI+PWI.

The main purpose of the study is to assess how well the standard ablation procedure (Varipulse Catheter) works over long term when used with different types of anesthesia in participants with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF, irregular heartbeat that comes and goes on its own, causing noticeable symptoms like a racing heart, or shortness of breath).

The main purpose of this clinical study is to investigate the effectiveness workflow of the clinical use of the pulsed field (PF) ablation system (VARIPULSE™ Catheter and TRUPULSE™ Generator) when used for cardiac ablation with the new VARIPULSE™ Pro software in participants with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF; irregular heartbeat where episodes start and stop on their own, usually within seven days) and persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF; irregular, rapid heartbeat that lasts over 7 days up to 1year and doesn't stop on its own).

The main purpose of this study is to investigate the workflow of the clinical use of the pulsed field (PF) ablation system (VARIPULSE catheter and TRUPULSE generator) when used for cardiac ablation with the new VARIPULSE Pro software in participants with persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF; irregular, rapid heart rhythm that lasts over 7 days and doesn't stop on its own)

The purpose of this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study is to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of varying doses of intravenous magnesium in the treatment of AFF RVR.

The objective of this single-center pilot study is, with the help of a connected watch, to show the absence of recurrence or maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with a Post Operative Atrial Fibrillation (POAF) and to help treating cardiologists in the care of these patients.

This purpose of this study is to understand how safe Biosense Webster Pulsed Field (PF)/Radiofrequency (RF) ablation system is and how well it works over 12 months in participants with persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF; abnormal heart signals that cause irregular heartbeats).

The goal of this observational study is to learn about the effects of antiplatelet drugs on patients over the age of 80 with atrial fibrillation. The main question it aims to answer is: -Is platelet reactivity effectively controlled in patients over the age of 80 diagnosed with atrial fibrillation following the Watchman procedure.

DISPLAY-AF is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm post-market clinical follow-up investigation designed to evaluate whether spatiotemporal dispersion areas identified by the Volta AF-Xplorer II artificial intelligence (AI) software can predict recurrence of atrial arrhythmias after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI)-only ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.

The objective of this feasibility study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the FARAFLEX mapping and pulsed field ablation (PFA) catheter, a novel catheter in treating persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF) or symptomatic Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (PAF).

PULSED AF PAS is a prospective, global, multi-center, non-randomized, observational trial. Subjects will be treated with the PulseSelect™ PFA System and followed through 36 months.