About this trial
evaluate and compare the clinical, and radiographic outcomes of 2.7 mm locking compression mini-plate osteosynthesis versus titanium elastic intramedullary nail (TEN) in the surgical management of diaphyseal fractures of both forearm bones in adolescent patients
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Age: 10 to 16 years (at time of injury).
Fracture pattern: diaphyseal fracture involving both the radius or ulna.
Angulation > 15° in any plane (sagittal or frontal).
Translation > 50% of bone diameter.
Disqualifiers
Open fracture Gustilo type II & III.
Pathological fracture (secondary to bone cyst, tumor, osteogenesis imperfecta, etc.).
Neurovascular compromise requiring emergent exploration (e.g., acute compartment syndrome, pulseless limb after reduction).
Floating elbow (ipsilateral supracondylar humerus fracture + forearm fracture).
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Open reduction and internal fixation
Procedure/SurgeryGroup A (mini-Plate group): Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using a 2.7 mm locking compression mini-plate (LCP) system.
Closed or mini-open reduction and fixation
Procedure/SurgeryGroup B (TEN group): Closed or mini-open reduction and fixation using titanium elastic nails (TENs).
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Functional outcome assessed using the Grace and Eversmann scoring system.
Secondary outcomes
Radiographic Bone Union Time
the time until bridging callus is visible across at least 3 of 4 cortices on standard AP and lateral X-rays
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: