Manual Arthroplasty Versus VELYS Robotic-Assisted Solution Functional Alignment Arthroplasty for Knee Osteoarthritis

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorGolden Jubilee National Hospital

About this trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the VELYS Robotic-Assisted Solution (VRAS) device helps to improve outcomes from total knee replacement, when compared to regular non-robotic-assisted total knee replacement in the treatment of osteoarthritis. It will also aim to review the longer-term safety and efficiency effects of using this device.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

1. Does VRAS device-assisted total knee replacement improve patient outcomes (such as their function, satisfaction, and pain) when compared to non-robotic-assisted total knee replacement? 2. Does VRAS device-assisted total knee replacement improve clinical outcomes (such as revision risk, complications, and hospital length of stay) when compared to non-robotic-assisted total knee replacement? 3. Does VRAS device-assisted total knee replacement improve functional outcomes (including biomechanical motion analysis) when compared to non-robotic-assisted total knee replacement? 4. What are the economic and efficiency effects of VRAS device-assisted total knee replacement compared to non-robotic-assisted total knee replacement? 5. What are the human factor and learning curve effects of introducing VRAS device-assisted total knee replacement into healthcare teams? 6. Are there any differences in safety and adverse event incidence between VRAS device-assisted total knee replacement and non-robotic-assisted total knee replacement?

Participants will:

* Be randomised to receive a total knee replacement using either regular non-robotic-assisted methods, or with the use of the VRAS device. * Be assessed pre-operatively at the clinic, and then at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months following date of operation. At these appointments patients will answer questionnaires, receive an x-ray (pre-operatively, and at 6 months post-operatively), and a subgroup will be reviewed in the motion analysis laboratory (pre-operatively, and at 6 months post-operatively). * Have their longer-term outcomes including any revision operations monitored out to 10 years through national registry data linkage (no actual follow-up for patients after 12 months).

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Aged >18 years

Primary knee OA

Requiring TKA

Suitable for either raTKA or mTKA

Disqualifiers

Inflammatory arthritis

Significant symptomatic hip, ankle, or contralateral knee OA

Prior TKA or major injury or major surgery on the index knee

Neuromuscular gait disorders

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Robot-Assisted Functionally Aligned Total Knee Replacement

    Device

    This device is a semi-active image-free arthroplasty robot that is under the full control of the surgeon at all times, but helps to make certain parts of the operation more accurate (bone cuts). The device will allow for use of so-called functional alignment. The implant put into the knee (ATTUNE total knee replacement) is the same for either of the techniques used (traditional method or VELYS robot). It has an excellent track record and is widely used in the UK and throughout the world.

  • Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty

    Procedure/Surgery

    This will be a manual total knee replacement carried out in standard fashion using ATTUNE implants with a good UK and worldwide track record. Alignment philosophies used will be manually achievable.

Treatment groups

346 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: VELYS Robotic-Assisted Total Knee ReplacementExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Manual Non-Robotic Total Knee ReplacementActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Change in Forgotten Joint Score

Using validated Forgotten Joint Score questionnaire. Maximum score 100, minimum 0. Higher score equates to better outcome.

Time frame
Pre-surgery to be compared with 6 months post-surgery.

Secondary outcomes

1

Change in Forgotten Joint Score

Using validated Forgotten Joint Score questionnaire. Maximum score 100, minimum 0. Higher score equates to better outcome.

Time frame
Measured pre-operatively, and at 6 weeks, and 12 months.
2

Absolute Forgotten Joint Score

Using validated Forgotten Joint Score questionnaire. Maximum score 100, minimum 0. Higher score equates to better outcome.

Time frame
Measured at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months.
3

Oxford Knee Score

Using validated Oxford Knee Score questionnaire. Maximum is 48, minimum is 0. Higher score equates to better outcome.

Time frame
Measured pre-operatively, at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months.
4

EQ-5D-5L

Using validated EQ-5D-5L quality of life questionnaire. For the description component a subject self-rates their health in terms of five dimensions; mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression using a five-level scale. The evaluation component requires a patient to record their overall health status using a visual analogue scale. Following assessment the scores from the descriptive component can be reported as a five digit number ranging from 11111 (full health) to 55555 (worst health). With the overall health status from the evaluation component reported as a number from 0 (worst overall health state) to 100 (best overall health state).

Time frame
Measured pre-operatively, at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months.

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Golden Jubilee National Hospital

Lead sponsor

Johnson & Johnson

Collaborator

DePuy Orthopaedics

Collaborator