Osteoarthritis, Knee

The main purpose of this study is to test the safety and efficacy of study drug for the treatment of knee pain due to osteoarthritis (OA). This trial is part of the chronic pain master protocol H0P-MC-CPMP (NCT05986292), which is a protocol to accelerate the development of new treatments for chronic pain.

The primary aim of this study is to investigate whether low-dose radiotherapy is an effective treatment to reduce the pain of knee osteoarthritis. A secondary aim is to determine whether patients experience any more measurable side effects than those receiving sham treatments.

This study is being done to look at the safety and effect of NNC0487-0111 in people with excess body weight and knee osteoarthritis when compared to placebo. There are 2 study treatments in this study taken as injections under the skin once a week. Participants will either get NNC0487-0111, (the treatment being tested) or Placebo (a treatment that has no active medicine in it). Which treatment participants get is decided by chance.

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to learn whether taking ibuprofen, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, after a platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection changes pain relief and knee function in adults with knee osteoarthritis. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does ibuprofen change the improvement in knee pain six months after a PRP injection compared with acetaminophen? Does ibuprofen change knee function or the need for additional pain medicine during follow-up? Researchers will compare PRP followed by ibuprofen with PRP followed by acetaminophen. Participants will receive one ultrasound-guided PRP injection and take the assigned medication every eight hours for five days. They will complete assessments of pain, knee function, additional pain medicine use, and safety. Participants and the physician performing the injection will not know which medication was assigned.

Steroid injections used to treat painful joints can temporarily increase glucose levels in people with type 2 diabetes. This study will test whether a short course of pre-emptive neutral protamine Hagedorn, NPH, insulin can reduce high glucose after a standard corticosteroid injection into the knee. Adults with type 2 diabetes who are scheduled to receive one intra-articular injection of triamcinolone acetonide 40 mg for knee osteoarthritis will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. The experimental group will receive a prespecified NPH insulin regimen beginning immediately after the injection and continuing for three doses. The comparison group will continue usual reactive diabetes management without pre-emptive NPH insulin. Both groups will use blinded continuous glucose monitoring and scheduled capillary glucose testing. The main outcome is the percentage of continuous glucose monitoring time above 180 mg/dL during the first 72 hours after the corticosteroid injection. Hypoglycaemia, rescue treatment, healthcare contacts, treatment burden, acceptability and adverse events will also be assessed.

The goal of this randomised controlled feasibility trial is to find out whether it is possible to run a larger study of the Good Boost+ community based rehabilitation programme for people waiting for a primary total knee replacement. The study will look at how many people are willing to take part, whether they stay in the study, and whether they can follow the Good Boost+ programme as planned. It will also explore how acceptable the programme is to patients, NHS staff and leisure centre staff, and which outcome measures are most useful for a future full scale trial. The study will also look at what helps or hinders delivery of the programme in real world NHS and community settings. The main questions it aims to answer are: * How many people waiting for knee replacement surgery are willing to take part in the study * Whether participants can continue with the Good Boost+ programme as planned over the study period * Which outcome measures best capture any potential benefits of the programme * How acceptable the programme is to patients, NHS and leisure centre staff * What helps or makes it difficult to deliver the programme in practice. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. * Usual NHS care or * Usual NHS care plus the Good Boost+ programme Participants in the Good Boost+ programme will take part in six weekly group water based exercise sessions held in local swimming pools, as well as land based exercise sessions that can be done individually or by joining a virtual group. The exercise sessions are delivered through Good Boost's digital technology, using small waterproof tablet computers at swimming pools, and smartphones or computers for land-based sessions. Physiotherapy staff will provide guidance throughout, and volunteers will offer refreshments after pool sessions to support social connection. All participants, including those receiving usual NHS care only, will be asked to complete an exercise diary, rate their knee pain each week, and complete short questionnaires at 6 and 10 weeks after joining the study.

This project, conducted within the Department of Veterans Affairs Healthcare System (VHA), will test the effectiveness of an intervention to improve adherence to home exercise among Veterans receiving physical therapy (PT) for knee osteoarthritis (OA). The intervention, "Boosting Exercise Adherence in Knee Osteoarthritis" (BOOST-OA), has two phases. During the initiation phase (first 3 months of PT care), patients will receive tools and activities to address outcome expectations, action self-efficacy, goal-setting and monitoring. During the behavior maintenance phase (starting after PT care and continuing for 9 months), patients will receive health coaching calls that address satisfaction with outcomes, relapse prevention planning and independent monitoring. There are three main study aims: (1) examine improvements in patient outcomes, such as physical function, following BOOST-OA; (2) explore patient characteristics that lead to difference in reported improvements; and (3) interview participants and clinicians about their experience with BOOST-OA to inform future implementation.

The goal of this study is to establish the efficacy of an intervention of dietary weight loss, exercise, and weight-loss maintenance for knee Osteoarthritis (OA) prevention in adult females aged ≥ 50 years with obesity and no or infrequent knee pain. The primary aim is to compare the effects of a dietary weight loss, exercise, and weight-loss maintenance to an attention control group in preventing the development of structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) knee OA. Secondary aims will determine the intervention effects on pain, mobility, health-related quality of life, knee joint compressive forces, inflammatory measures, weight loss, exercise self-efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of this intervention.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether robotic-assisted total knee replacement improves recovery compared with conventional total knee replacement in adults with knee osteoarthritis when both groups follow the same structured home-based rehabilitation program. Robotic-assisted and conventional (non-robotic) total knee replacement are both widely used as part of routine clinical care. This study will compare recovery during the first six weeks after surgery. The main questions the study aims to answer are: 1. Does robotic-assisted total knee replacement improve knee pain and knee function six weeks after surgery compared with conventional total knee replacement? 2. Does robotic-assisted surgery improve physical function, walking ability, leg strength, quality of life, and participants' experience of rehabilitation? 3. Are there any differences in recovery, length of hospital stay, or safety between the two surgical approaches? Researchers will compare robotic-assisted total knee replacement with conventional total knee replacement. Both groups will complete the same rehabilitation program before and after surgery so that any differences in recovery are more likely to be related to the type of surgery rather than differences in rehabilitation. Participants will: * Be randomly assigned (by chance, similar to flipping a coin) to receive either robotic-assisted or conventional total knee replacement surgery. * Complete a structured rehabilitation program that includes education and exercises during the four weeks before surgery and a home-based exercise program for six weeks after surgery. * Use a study-provided seated exercise bike, receive support from a physiotherapist through telehealth appointments, secure messaging, and home visits where required, and use a digital application to guide the rehabilitation program and record exercise completion and symptoms. * Complete questionnaires about knee pain, knee function, general health, quality of life, and satisfaction with the rehabilitation program. * Attend study assessments before surgery, immediately before surgery after completing the pre-surgery program, and about six weeks after surgery. These assessments include simple physical activities such as standing up from a chair, walking, cycling, and measuring leg strength. * Allow information about their surgery and hospital stay, such as the duration of surgery and the number of nights spent in hospital, to be recorded for the study. The results of this study will help researchers understand whether robotic-assisted total knee replacement provides additional benefits over conventional total knee replacement when both are combined with the same structured home-based rehabilitation program. The findings may help patients, healthcare professionals, and health services make informed decisions about the use of robotic-assisted knee replacement surgery.

Prospective, multicenter, two-arm, 2:1 randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing the benefits in subjects with medial knee osteoarthritis who are treated with either the MISHA Knee System or with non-surgical treatment. This is the first randomized head-to-head study comparing outcomes from subjects treated with the MISHA Knee System.

This clinical trial is conducted to compare and evaluate the efficacy and safety of Tergase injection (4,500 IU) in reducing postoperative edema between treated and untreated knees in patients undergoing bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Prior to participation, all subjects receive a full explanation of the study and provide voluntary written informed consent. Only subjects who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria through screening procedures are enrolled. Enrolled subjects are randomly assigned to the experimental and control groups in a 1:1 ratio per knee, utilizing a split-body clinical trial design that compares both knees of the same subject. The analysis target is 60 knees obtained from a total of 30 subjects. According to the randomization results, the knee assigned to the experimental group receives a subcutaneous injection of 3 vials (4,500 IU) of Tergase, while the contralateral knee serves as the untreated control group. By including both the experimental and control groups within the same subject, inter-individual variation is minimized. While the investigator performing the injection is aware of the assignment, the subject remains blinded. To overcome the physical impossibility of blinding the injector due to the route of administration and drug characteristics, an 'Evaluator-Blinded' design is adopted to maintain objectivity equivalent to a double-blind study. To achieve this, the unblinded injector and the blinded evaluator who measures efficacy outcomes are strictly separated, and operational blinding is maintained by blocking information exchange between the two groups. Subjects are evaluated for efficacy and safety during hospitalization or outpatient visits at Day 1, 2, 3, 5, Week 2, Week 6, and Month 3 after bilateral TKA. Participation ends upon completion of the planned visits.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between the clinical and radiographic severity of knee osteoarthritis (OA) and the serum levels of specific biomarkers, namely Fetuin-A and Cartilage Oligomeric Matrix Protein (COMP). Osteoarthritis is a degenerative joint disease characterized by cartilage breakdown and low-grade inflammation. Investigating these biomarkers may help healthcare providers better understand the disease pathology, potentially leading to earlier diagnosis and improved tracking of disease progression. The study will compare two distinct groups: a patient group consisting of 120 individuals diagnosed with Grade 2-4 knee osteoarthritis, and a control group of 60 age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers with no history of joint disorders. Participants will undergo radiographic evaluations using the Kellgren-Lawrence classification system, alongside clinical and functional assessments, including pain severity scales, mobility metrics, and functional questionnaires. Fasting blood samples will be collected from all participants to measure serum Fetuin-A and COMP levels via laboratory analysis, and the Systemic Inflammation Response Index (SIRI) will be calculated. The collected data will be statistically analyzed to determine if biomarker levels significantly correlate with the severity of knee joint degeneration and functional impairment.

Brief Summary The goal of this pilot study is to evaluate the feasibility and safety of conducting a randomized comparison of two standard-of-care knee radiofrequency ablation (RFA) techniques in adults with chronic knee pain related to knee osteoarthritis. Participants who are already scheduled to receive knee RFA as part of their standard clinical care will be randomized to receive either a standard 3-target (standard) RFA protocol or a 6-target (novel) RFA protocol. The main purpose of this pilot study is to determine whether a future larger randomized trial comparing these two RFA approaches is feasible and safe to conduct. Participants will complete questionnaires about pain, knee function, and stiffness at baseline and at follow-up timepoints for up to 12 months after the RFA procedure. Preliminary pain relief outcomes will also be explored to help inform the design of a future definitive trial. Participants already scheduled for a knee RFA procedure as part of their standard of care for pain related to knee osteoarthritis will answer online survey questions about their pain for up to 12 months.

Osteoarthritis is the most common degenerative condition affecting the knee joint globally, with an incidence of about 7% of the population. In Italy, it affects approximately 3.9 million people, with a direct treatment cost of around €2.5 billion. At the joint level, osteoarthritis manifests with pain and reduced functionality, worsening as the disease progresses and severely limiting knee movement. Compounding this, osteoarthritis can impact both elderly and younger individuals due to traumatic factors. Despite its significant impact, effective treatments for osteoarthritis that address its underlying causes are still lacking, focusing mainly on symptom management. Therefore, improving diagnostic and prognostic approaches is crucial to better understand its onset and progression. MRI is a primary diagnostic tool for assessing the knee joint's pathophysiological state. It uses tissue-specific sequences to investigate joint homeostasis in detail, although it primarily provides insights into morphology, structure, and tissue composition rather than functional changes within the joint. This limitation is noteworthy because joint homeostasis involves complex interactions among biomechanical, structural, and biological processes, which are directly influenced by osteoarthritis. Gait analysis provides valuable diagnostic information on joint function. By integrating sensor measurements and electronic systems with patient-specific musculoskeletal models derived from MRI morphometric data, it is possible to assess the forces and moments within the joint during specific movements. Given that osteoarthritis affects the entire joint, employing multidisciplinary approaches can enhance diagnostic precision and provide insights into the progressive impact of degenerative conditions like osteoarthritis on joint health.

The purpose of the chronic pain master protocol is to compare independent pain interventions and establish an overarching structure for the disease-state addenda (DSA) and intervention-specific appendices (ISAs). The ISAs may start independently of other ISAs as interventions become available for clinical testing.

This study investigates how well individuals with knee osteoarthritis can learn to alter their calf muscle activation using haptic biofeedback while walking and evaluates how these changes affect knee loading. Prior research has utilized musculoskeletal simulations to determine that reducing the activation of one of the calf muscles, the gastrocnemius, can have a large impact on reducing knee loading. However, this has not been tested in individuals with knee osteoarthritis. In this study, participants will be trained to alter the activation of their gastrocnemius muscle, by receiving haptic feedback after each step. The feedback will indicate how the participant changed their muscle activation relative to baseline. Some participants will train on a treadmill in the laboratory for up to two sessions, with 30 minutes of walking with feedback in each session. If a participant can learn to adjust their muscle activation in the first training session, they will be able to complete the second training session. Other participants will train outside the laboratory for one session with 30 minutes of walking with feedback to investigate changes in knee loading while using the new walking strategy during over-ground walking. The movement data collected during the training sessions will be used as inputs to computer simulations of the musculoskeletal system to determine if walking with the new muscle activation strategy reduces knee loading.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if compressive cryotherapy can reduce postoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty. It will also evaluate whether compressive cryotherapy improves postoperative recovery compared with standard care using conventional ice application. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does compressive cryotherapy reduce the total consumption of opioids during the first 7 days after total knee arthroplasty? Does compressive cryotherapy reduce postoperative pain and improve early recovery compared with standard cryotherapy? Researchers will compare compressive cryotherapy using the Game Ready® device with standard care using traditional ice packs to determine whether the intervention reduces opioid consumption and improves postoperative outcomes. Participants will: Be randomly assigned to receive compressive cryotherapy or standard cryotherapy with ice packs after surgery. Apply the assigned treatment four times per day during the first 7 postoperative days. Record daily pain levels using a visual analog scale (VAS) and document opioid consumption in a pain diary. Attend a follow-up visit on postoperative day 7 for evaluation of knee swelling, hematoma size, and recovery using the QoR-15 questionnaire.

A Phase 2 Randomized Study to Evaluate the Effects of triamcinolone acetonide extended-release (TA-ER; Zilretta) vs. triamcinolone acetonide immediate-release (TA-IR; Kenalog) on Blood Glucose Levels in Diabetic Subjects with Knee Osteoarthritis. Subjects should have Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) with HbA1C ≤9 that is managed without insulin and have been diagnosed with symptomatic unilateral or bilateral osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee, based on clinical and radiological criteria (if bilateral, then a target knee will be selected).Total study duration for individual subject will be about 4 months, which includes 3 weeks of Screening period, 10 days of pretreatment phase, treatment day, and 12 weeks of post-treatment period.

The first-line treatment for knee osteoarthritis (KOA) in terms of pain and functionality is physical exercise. The use of interferential current (IC) associated with other resources may be beneficial in reducing pain intensity and improving functionality. However, the effects of its simultaneous use with therapeutic exercise have not yet been fully established. The aim of this project will be to evaluate the effects of including IC in a therapeutic exercise program in relation to pain intensity, functionality, self-efficacy, maximum voluntary contraction and overall perceived effect in individuals with KOA. Therefore, research participants of both sexes, between 40 and 75 years old, with a clinical diagnosis of unilateral KOA, who have knee pain for more than 3 months, with a minimum score of 3 points on the numerical pain scale, morning stiffness for less than 30 minutes, crepitation, bone sensitivity, and absence of palpable heat will be recruited. The research participants will be randomized into three groups: therapeutic exercises (n=46) and therapeutic exercises + IC (n=46) and therapeutic exercises + IC placebo (n=46). Eight consecutive weeks of treatment will be carried out. The research participants will be evaluated before the intervention, after the end of the intervention of eight consecutive weeks of intervention and after four weeks at the end of the last week of intervention, through the instruments: numeric pain scale (NPS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), patient-specific functional scale (EFEP), Pain self-efficacy questionnaire (PSEQ), maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC), 30-second sit-to-stand test (TSL30s), global perception scale (EPG). For data analysis, a normality test will be used to verify the distribution of the data and a statistical test appropriate for the appropriate intra and inter-group comparisons, thus considering two factors in the comparisons, time and group. A significance level of 5% will be adopted.

Research participants diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis will be randomized through a draw using sealed opaque envelopes indicating two groups: 1. therapeutic exercises, 2. therapeutic exercises + chronic pain neuroscience education program. The primary outcome will be functional performance using a patient-reported measure, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). The selected secondary outcomes will be pain intensity by the numerical pain scale (END), physical function reported by the patient by the patient-specific functional scale (EFEP), Pain self-efficacy questionnaire (PSEQ), functional mobility by the timed up and test (TUG), general effect perceived through the global perception scale (EPG), muscle strength through Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction (MVIC) and functionality and disability through the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS).

Fast-track total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a well-established concept including optimized logistics and evidence-based treatment, focusing on minimizing surgical stress and improved post-operative recovery. The aim of this protocol is to compare the standard care and fast track total knee arthroplasties in terms of functional and subjective outcomes, hospital staying, number of transfusions and analgesic consumption.

Knee is the most common site of osteoarthritis. Treatment of knee osteoarthritis starts with a full course of medical therapy, followed by surgery to replace the knee with a prosthesis if this strategy fails, or in advanced cases. However, the new recommendations of the French rheumatology society, which evaluate the various treatments and position them in the treatment plan, are not well known, and the definition of a complete treatment remains unclear. The vast majority of patients are therefore referred to a surgeon after having tried a small part of the therapeutic arsenal (generally analgesics and corticosteroid or hyaluronic acid infiltrations). The goal of this study is to to select patients most likely to gain from surgery and to develop strategies that avoid the need for major surgery.

The purpose of this study is to measure the change in pain and function with subcutaneous injections of pentosan polysulfate sodium (PPS) compared with subcutaneous injections of placebo in participants with knee OA pain. Study details include: * The study duration will be up to 64 weeks. * The treatment duration will be 6 weeks. * The visit frequency will be twice weekly during treatment. * The visit/contact frequency will be every 4-6 weeks during the 52-week Follow-up period. * Approximately 466 participants will be enrolled into this study.

Veterans face a high prevalence of knee osteoarthritis (OA), but current diagnostic methods often miss early stages when interventions are more effective. This project will evaluate smartphone-based motion capture via OpenCap to measure joint mechanics in knee OA patients during functional activities, comparing its performance to a conventional motion capture system, patient-reported symptoms, and knee joint structure. The findings will have the potential to enable clinicians to trial OpenCap in its current form, provide insights into tracking joint health, and guide refinements to advance toward earlier diagnosis of knee OA by complementing symptom assessments with measures of joint mechanics.

PROSAP-A is a perioperative randomized, controlled trial with a 12-month follow-up period after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA), aiming to investigate both acute and long-term postoperative effects of preoperative sleep-promotion. Participants with clinically significant insomnia symptoms will be randomized to a brief, hybrid version of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) or sleep education therapy, administered over a 4-week period, prior to surgery. The primary objective is to evaluate effects of preoperative sleep-promotion on acute postoperative pain control. Secondary objectives include evaluation of postoperative sleep, recovery, mental health, cognitive function and alterations in blood biomarkers.