About this trial
This study compares two materials (Zantex and Zirconia) used to make fixed full-arch dental prostheses supported by four dental implants (the "All-on-Four" technique) in patients who have no natural teeth in the lower jaw. The study will evaluate how much bacteria builds up on each material and how healthy the gum tissue around the implants stays over time. Each patient will receive one type of prosthesis (either Zantex or Zirconia framework), and will be followed for three months after treatment. The goal is to help determine which material may provide better oral health outcomes for patients receiving this type of dental treatment.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Completely edentulous patients in the mandibular arch.
Patients with a completely edentulous maxillary arch rehabilitated with a conventional complete denture.
Patients with sufficient mandibular bone volume and quality to allow placement of four implants according to the All-on-Four treatment concept.
Patients suitable for placement of two axial anterior implants in the canine regions and two distally tilted posterior implants anterior to the mental foramina.
Disqualifiers
1. Patients with systemic conditions that contraindicate implant surgery or may adversely affect osseointegration or wound healing.
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Zirconia Framework
DeviceA metal-free zirconia ceramic framework used to fabricate a screw-retained mandibular hybrid prosthesis supported by four dental implants (All-on-Four protocol)
Zantex Framework
DeviceA fiber-reinforced polymer (Zantex) metal-free framework used to fabricate a screw-retained mandibular hybrid prosthesis supported by four dental implants (All-on-Four protocol).
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Microbial Adhesion on Prosthesis Framework
Quantitative assessment of bacterial biofilm accumulation on the intaglio surface of the prosthesis framework, measured using microbiological culture/colony counting techniques.
Secondary outcomes
Modified Plaque Index
Modified Plaque Index (mPI) assessed using a standardized plastic periodontal probe at multiple sites around each implant, scored on a scale from 0 to 3, where higher scores indicate greater plaque accumulation (worse outcome).
Modified Bleeding on Probing Index (mBOP)
Modified Bleeding on Probing (mBOP) assessed using a standardized plastic periodontal probe at multiple sites around each implant, scored on a scale from 0 to 3, where higher scores indicate greater bleeding tendency (worse outcome).
Probing Depth
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.