Multicentric Clinical Investigation to Assess Safety and Performance of Lux HighAdd IOL

ConditionCataract
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age50+
SponsorCutting Edge SAS

About this trial

The study purpose is to demonstrate safety and performance of bilateral implantation of LuxHighAdd intraocular lens compared with the LuxGood Monofocal lens.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Subject aged 50 or over on the day of inclusion, presenting a bilateral cataract, qualified for bilateral implantation

No ocular comorbidity possibly affecting the study results

Fit within the available IOL diopter range

Have had no previous refractive surgery

Disqualifiers

Ocular surface disease potentially affecting study results

Pre-existing ocular pathology or history of pathology potentially affecting the study results

Acute or chronic disease or illness that would increase risk or confound study results

Subjects who may be reasonably expected to require a secondary surgical intervention at any time during the investigation (other than YAG capsulotomy)

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • LuxHighAdd IOL

    Device

    Bilateral implantation in the capsular bag to replace the cataractous human crystalline lens.

  • LuxGood IOL

    Device

    Bilateral implantation in the capsular bag to replace the cataractous human crystalline lens.

Treatment groups

57 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: LuxHighAddExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: LuxGood groupActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Distance Corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA)

To demonstrate the difference in monocular DCNVA between the High Add lens and the LuxGood monofocal lens by means of statistical significance.

Time frame
4/6 months after surgery
2

Best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA)

To demonstrate the non-inferiority of the Lux High Add lens compared with the monofocal control LuxGood lens in terms of BCDVA by means of statistical significance.

Time frame
4/6 months after surgery

Secondary outcomes

1

Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UDVA)

Uncorrected photopic visual acuity at far in monocular and binocular with LuxHighAdd lens compared to LuxGood lens.

Time frame
4/6 months after surgery
2

Uncorrected Intermediate Visual Acuity (UIVA)

Uncorrected photopic visual acuity at intermediate distance in monocular and binocular with LuxHighAdd lens compared to LuxGood lens.

Time frame
4/6 months after surgery
3

Uncorrected Near Visual Acuity (UNVA)

Uncorrected photopic visual acuity at near distance in monocular and binocular with LuxHighAdd lens compared to LuxGood lens.

Time frame
4/6 months after surgery
4

Distance Corrected Intermediate Visual Acuity (DCIVA)

Photopic visual acuity at intermediate distance in monocular and binocular with best distance correction with LuxHighAdd lens compared to LuxGood lens.

Time frame
4/6 months after surgery

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.