Ni-Ti Shape-Memory Versus Conventional Sectional Matrices Systems in Class II Composite Restorations: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorCairo University

About this trial

The aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial is to evaluate and compare the clinical performance of a Ni-Ti shape-memory sectional matrix system versus a conventional sectional matrix system in Class II direct composite restorations.

The study will specifically assess the following clinical parameters:

1. Proximal contact tightness 2. Proximal contour quality 3. Fracture and retention of the restoration 4. Marginal adaptation These clinical parameters will be evaluated immediately after restoration placement and after a 1-year follow-up using standardized clinical assessment methods, including the FDI criteria, dental floss evaluation, and radiographic assessment, where applicable.

Fracture and retention, and marginal adaptation will be assessed according to predefined scoring criteria.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Adult patients (≥18 years) requiring Class II composite restorations in posterior teeth.

Good oral hygiene and periodontal health.

No systemic conditions affecting oral health.

Disqualifiers

Patients with bruxism or parafunctional habits.

Severe malocclusion interfering with proximal contacts.

Allergy to dental materials used in the study.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Ni-Ti Shape-Memory Sectional Matrix System

    Device

    Intervention 1 - Ni-Ti Shape-Memory Sectional Matrix System Quickmat-Flex ultra-thin titanium sectional matrix band combined with a Ni-Ti shape-memory separation ring for restoration of Class II posterior composite cavities. Intervention 2 - Conventional Sectional Matrix System TOR VM stainless-steel sectional matrix system combined with a conventional separation ring for restoration of Class II posterior composite cavities.

Treatment groups

50 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Ni-Ti Shape Memory Matrix SystemExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Conventional Sectional Matrix SystemActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Proximal Contact Tightness

Proximal contact tightness will be evaluated according to the FDI criteria (item 8: approximal anatomical form). Clinical assessment will be performed using a dental floss test and calibrated metal blades (25-100 μm) to assess resistance at the proximal contact area. The outcome will be recorded according to the FDI grading scale (8.1-8.5), as described by Heintze et al. (2010).

Time frame
Immediately After Restoration Placement (baseline)

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: