Optimization and Validation of Quality Control Indicators for Coronary Revascularization Based on Antiplatelet Therapy

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorShenyang Northern Hospital

About this trial

Study Purpose Coronary heart disease (CAD) is a leading global cause of death, with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) as its acute and life-threatening subtype. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) plus stent implantation is the first-line treatment for ACS, and post-PCI Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT, aspirin + P2Y₁₂ inhibitor) is core for thrombosis prevention but increases bleeding risk. Approximately 40% of ACS patients are classified as High Bleeding Risk (HBR). China lacks a unified DAPT quality control system, and the predictive value of the OPT-CAD ischemic risk score for this population remains unvalidated. This study aims to: 1) Evaluate the feasibility and influencing factors of the DAPT quality control system in HBR ACS patients post-PCI; 2) Verify the accuracy of the OPT-CAD score in predicting ischemic risk, providing evidence for personalized treatment.

Eligibility Criteria Inclusion Criteria Aged ≥18 years; Diagnosed with ACS and implanted with at least one drug-eluting stent (DES) during PCI; Meets ARC-HBR (Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk) HBR definition (1 major criterion or 2 minor criteria); Able to complete OPT-CAD scoring; Tolerates 12-month DAPT (physician assessment); Signs informed consent. Exclusion Criteria Allergy to aspirin, clopidogrel, ticagrelor, or other study-related antiplatelet drugs; Severe ischemia or major bleeding during current hospitalization; Terminal illness with life expectancy \<1 year; Pregnant or planning pregnancy within 1 year; Enrolled in other ongoing clinical studies. Study Process

This is a multi-center prospective cohort study (we will follow eligible patients over 12 months to collect real-world data without changing their standard care) recruiting 3,500 participants nationwide. Post-enrollment:

Receive 6-12 months of standard DAPT (regimen determined by your physician); Follow-ups at 1 month (±7 days), 3 months (±14 days), 6 months (±30 days), and 12 months (±30 days) post-PCI (via phone or outpatient visit) to collect medication adherence, bleeding/ischemic events, and clinical outcomes; Confidential data collection via a secure Electronic Data Capture (EDC) system. Study Endpoints Primary Endpoints Feasibility of the DAPT quality control system, inter-hospital differences in DAPT use, 6-12 month DAPT completion rate, and impact of DAPT interruption on patient outcomes; Accuracy of the OPT-CAD score in predicting ischemic risk for HBR patients. Secondary Endpoints 12-month bleeding event rates (BARC 1-5 types, including minor bleeding like puncture site bleeding and major bleeding like intracranial hemorrhage); 12-month ischemic event rates (including target lesion failure-cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization-all-cause death, ischemic stroke, definite stent thrombosis, etc.); DAPT interruption rate, P2Y₁₂ inhibitor discontinuation rate (≥1 week), and aspirin discontinuation rate (≥1 week).

Key Information for Participants Voluntary participation: You may withdraw anytime without penalty or loss of medical benefits; Confidential data protection: Personal information will be anonymized with a unique study ID; Free study-related assessments and follow-ups; Prompt medical care will be provided for any adverse events. For inquiries, contact the study team at the participating hospital.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Aged ≥ 18 years

Clinically diagnosed with ACS and received implantation of at least one drug-eluting stent (DES)

Meets 1 major criterion or 2 minor criteria of the ARC-HBR high-bleeding-risk definition

Able to complete the OPT-CAD score calculation

Disqualifiers

Allergy to study medications such as aspirin, clopidogrel, or ticagrelor

Occurrence of major ischemic or bleeding events during the current hospitalization

Presence of other severe diseases with a life expectancy of less than one year

Pregnancy, or women of childbearing potential who plan to become pregnant within one year

Trial population

Study participants will be selected from inpatients admitted to multiple nationwide medical centers (including prefecture/county-level hospitals and provincial/national key hospitals) who are clinically diagnosed with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) and undergo Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) with Drug-Eluting Stent (DES) implantation during hospitalization. The source population consists of ACS patients who meet the clinical diagnostic criteria, require PCI treatment, and are potentially at high bleeding risk (may fulfill ARC-HBR criteria). Patients with clear contraindications to Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT), inability to complete follow-up, or other conditions that make them unsuitable for the study are excluded from the source population.

Trial design

Design model

Cohort

Time perspective

Prospective

Treatments tested in this trial

Not listed

Trial groups

3,500 Participants
are grouped into 2 trial groups
Group A: Low Ischemic Risk (OPT-CAD < 90)
Group B: Moderate/High Ischemic Risk (OPT-CAD ≥ 90)

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

The overall composite of 11 performance measures for DAPT-based Quality Control Standard System for Coronary Artery Disease Revascularization.

The proportion of ACS patients scheduled for stent implantation during PCI who undergo risk stratification; The proportion of ACS patients undergoing PCI who initiate DAPT during the procedure; The proportion of ACS patients who maintain DAPT for at least 12 months after PCI; In patients at "high bleeding risk", the proportion of patients whose DAPT regimens are adjusted according to risk; The proportion of patients with implanted BRS who maintain DAPT for more than 12 months; The proportion of patients receiving alternative DAPT regimens due to drug intolerance or allergy; The proportion of implementation of optimized regimens combining anticoagulation with DAPT; The proportion of DAPT adjustment following bleeding events; Incidence of ischemic events: cardiac death, ischemic stroke, definite stent thrombosis, TVR, and TLF; Incidence of bleeding events: BARC Types 3/5 bleeding; The proportion of patients adherent to standardized DAPT.

Time frame
12 months
2

Accuracy of the OPT-CAD score in predicting ischemia risk in high-bleeding-risk patients.

The OPT-CAD score (Optimal antiPlatelet Therapy for Chinese patients with Coronary Artery Disease) is an ischemic risk scoring system developed based on the Chinese OPT-CAD registry study (107 centers, 14,032 patients). It is specifically used to predict long-term ischemic events and all-cause mortality in Chinese patients with coronary artery disease, especially those with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). OPT-CAD score ranges from 0 to 257 points in total. Patients are divided into three risk levels based on their total scores, corresponding to different incidences of ischemic events:Low risk 0-90 points ;Medium risk 91-150 points High risk ≥151 points.

Time frame
12 months

Secondary outcomes

1

Incidence of first BARC 3/5 bleeding within 12 months;

Incidence rate of major bleeding events (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC)\[1\] defined Type 3 and Type 5 bleeding) \[1\]Mehran R, Rao SV, Bhatt DL, Gibson CM, Caixeta A, Eikelboom J, Kaul S, Wiviott SD, Menon V, Nikolsky E, Serebruany V, Valgimigli M, Vranckx P, Taggart D, Sabik JF, Cutlip DE, Krucoff MW, Ohman EM, Steg PG, White H. Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Circulation. 2011 Jun 14;123(23):2736-47. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.009449. PMID: 21670242.

Time frame
12 months
2

Incidence of first BARC 2/3/5 bleeding within 12 months

Incidence rate of bleeding events (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC)\[1\] defined Type2, Type 3 and Type 5 bleeding, including puncture site bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage.)\[1\]Mehran R, Rao SV, Bhatt DL, Gibson CM, Caixeta A, Eikelboom J, Kaul S, Wiviott SD, Menon V, Nikolsky E, Serebruany V, Valgimigli M, Vranckx P, Taggart D, Sabik JF, Cutlip DE, Krucoff MW, Ohman EM, Steg PG, White H. Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Circulation. 2011 Jun 14;123(23):2736-47. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.009449. PMID: 21670242.

Time frame
12 months
3

Incidence of first BARC 1/2/3/5 bleeding within 12 months

Incidence rate of bleeding events (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC)\[1\] defined Type1, Type2, Type 3 and Type 5 bleeding, including puncture site bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage.)\[1\]Mehran R, Rao SV, Bhatt DL, Gibson CM, Caixeta A, Eikelboom J, Kaul S, Wiviott SD, Menon V, Nikolsky E, Serebruany V, Valgimigli M, Vranckx P, Taggart D, Sabik JF, Cutlip DE, Krucoff MW, Ohman EM, Steg PG, White H. Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Circulation. 2011 Jun 14;123(23):2736-47. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.009449. PMID: 21670242.

Time frame
12 months
4

Incidence of target lesion failure (TLF) within 12 months

defined as cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization

Time frame
12 months

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Shenyang Northern Hospital

Lead sponsor

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital

Collaborator

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: